角色分工机制视域下物理师范生科学推理能力的提升——基于认知网络分析的一项研究
Promotion of Scientific Reasoning Ability of Physics Normal Students from the Perspective of Role Division Mechanism—A Study Based on Cognitive Network Analysis
摘要: 分小组进行科学探究活动是培养科学推理能力的一个重要途径，然而组内同伴间的分工不同，是否会影响科学推理能力提升的结果却一直未被关注。在物理师范生进行科学探究的过程中采用同伴辅导模式，进行为期一学期的教学实践，对协作过程中的因角色分工而导致的科学推理能力发展的影响进行了研究，证明角色分工机制对科学推理能力各维度都有影响，不过不同角色的科学推理能力结构的变化也存在差异。
Abstract: Scientific inquiry activities in groups are an important way to cultivate scientific reasoning ability. However, whether the division of labor among peers in groups will affect the improvement of scientific reasoning ability has not been paid attention to. In the course of scientific inquiry of physics normal college students, peer tutoring mode is adopted for one semester teaching practice. The influence of role division on the development of scientific reasoning ability during collaborative processes is studied. It is proven that the role division mechanism has an influence on all dimensions of scientific reasoning ability, but there are also differences in the structure of scientific reasoning ability of different roles.
文章引用：高嵩, 冯辰钰, 蔡阳健. 角色分工机制视域下物理师范生科学推理能力的提升——基于认知网络分析的一项研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(4): 566-578. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.164687

参考文献

[1] National Research Council, Singer, S.R., Nielsen, N.R., et al. (2012) Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. National Academies Press.
[2] Lawson, A.E. (2010) Basic Inferences of Scientific Reasoning, Argumentation, and Discovery. Science Education, 94, 336-364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., et al. (2009) Learning and Scientific Reasoning. Science, 323, 586-587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] 郭玉英, 魏昕, 仲扣庄, 等. 高师物理专业本科生科学推理能力研究[J]. 物理教师, 2011, 32(1): 1-6.
[5] Osborne, J. (2010) Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science, 328, 463-466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Csanadi, A., Kollar, I. and Fischer, F. (2021) Pre-Service Teachers’ Evidence-Based Reasoning during Pedagogical Problem-Solving: Better Together? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36, 147-168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 王萌萌, 赵敏, 方恺. 探究式教学模式对本科生科学推理能力培养的效果分析[J]. 物理与工程, 2018, 28(5): 110-113.
[8] Lu, H.L. (2010) Research on Peer Coaching in Preservice Teacher Education—A Review of Literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 748-753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Bao, L., Koenig, K., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J., Zhou, S. and Chen, C. (2022) Theoretical Model and Quantitative Assessment of Scientific Thinking and Reasoning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, Article ID: 010115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Grooms, J., Enderle, P.J., Hutner, T., et al. (2016) Argument-Driven Inquiry in Physical Science: Lab Investigations for Grades 6-8. NSTA Press.
[11] Topping, K. and Ehly, S. (1998) Peer-Assisted Learning. Routledge.
[12] Falchikov, N. (2003) Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. Routledge.
[13] Topping, K.J. (2005) Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631-645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] McMillan, J.H. and Forsyth, D.R. (1991) What Theories of Motivation Say about Why Learners Learn. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991, 39-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 高嵩, 汪莹莹, 蔡阳健. ADI模式下培养物理师范生科学推理能力实证研究[J]. 高等理科教育, 2024(4): 45-56.
[16] 张春莉, 吴加奇, 姜国伶. 同伴互助配对方式对解决数学问题能力的影响[J]. 教育学报, 2019, 15(1): 74-81.
[17] Paulus, P. (2000) Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea‐Generating Groups. Applied Psychology, 49, 237-262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K. and Wecker, C. (2013) Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Educational Psychologist, 48, 56-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Gagné, R.M. (1985) The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[20] Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. (2011) Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. Routledge.
[22] Dunbar, K. (1995) How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories. In: The Nature of Insight, The MIT Press, 365-396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W. and Ruis, A.R. (2016) A Tutorial on Epistemic Network Analysis: Analyzing the Structure of Connections in Cognitive, Social, and Interaction Data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3, 9-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐