地方政府授权低空空域特许经营权的法治化
Legal Framework for Local Governments to Grant Rights for Low-Altitude Airspace
摘要: 作为战略性新兴产业的核心制度支撑,地方政府授权低空经济特许经营权是“放管服”改革在新兴领域的延伸实践,对于激活低空空域资源价值、培育经济增长新引擎具有关键作用。然而,这一授权行为与现有行政法体系存在多重制度冲突:其权力来源与空域管理中央事权、行政许可法定原则存在张力,授权属性与传统行政特许认知存在偏差,陷入了合法性困境。在规范逻辑上,地方争取授权的权力来源是宪法自然资源国家所有原则、单行法规定、中央政策授权与地方治理需求构成的多元谱系,其授权本质是低空空域使用权的市场化配置,而非管理权让渡,试点区域的管理参与权属于法定例外的特别监管程序。锚定这一属性与边界,亟需通过完善行政立法实现制度调适。未来应在《空域管理法》立法中明确授权规则,修订《行政许可法》增设低空经济特许特别程序,既为地方争取授权提供合法性支撑,也推动行政法体系回应新兴产业发展需求。
Abstract: As the core institutional support of strategic emerging industries, the local government’s authorization of low-altitude economic franchise is an extension of the reform of “decentralization, regulation and service” in emerging fields. It plays a key role in activating the value of low-altitude airspace resources and cultivating a new engine of economic growth. However, there are multiple institutional conflicts between this authorization behavior and the existing administrative law system: there is a tension between its power source and the central power of airspace management and the legal principle of administrative licensing, and there is a deviation between the authorization attribute and the traditional administrative licensing cognition, falling into the dilemma of legitimacy. In terms of normative logic, the source of local power to seek authorization is a multi-lineage system composed of the principle of state ownership of natural resources in the Constitution, the provisions of separate laws, the authorization of central policies and the needs of local governance. The essence of authorization is the market-oriented allocation of the right to use low-altitude airspace, rather than the transfer of management power. The right to participate in management in the pilot area is a special regulatory procedure with statutory exceptions. Anchoring this attribute and boundary, it is urgent to achieve institutional adjustment by improving administrative legislation. In the future, the authorization rules should be clearly defined in the legislation of the “Airspace Management Law”, and the “Administrative Licensing Law” should be amended to add special procedures for low-altitude economic licensing, which not only provides legal support for local governments to strive for authorization, but also promotes the administrative law system to respond to the development needs of emerging industries.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
蔡立东, 陆奕铭. 论公共数据资源特许经营的法构造[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2025(10): 2, 34-43, 177.
|
|
[2]
|
袁曾. 论空域权与空间权的分设——低空经济价值要素释放的法治供给[J]. 交大法学, 2025(6): 105-119.
|
|
[3]
|
张依, 谢思. 我国低空经济监管的演进逻辑、困境挑战与创新路径[J]. 中国流通经济, 2025, 39(10): 83-97.
|
|
[4]
|
黄彦钦. 制度转译与权力配置: 低空经济特许经营权的法律建构[J]. 东方法学, 2025(5): 173-186.
|
|
[5]
|
李显冬. 市政特许经营中的双重法律关系——兼论市政特许经营权的准物权性质[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2004(4): 42-45.
|
|
[6]
|
董念清. 低空经济法治保障的体系构建与制度再造——以低空空域管理改革为中心的分析[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2025(12): 113-124.
|
|
[7]
|
徐继敏. 论省级政府配置地方行政权的权力[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013(4): 153-160.
|
|
[8]
|
黄新华, 李欣澄. 推动低空经济高质量发展: 动力、风险与规制[J]. 湖湘论坛, 2025, 38(6): 92-100.
|
|
[9]
|
曹正汉, 史晋川. 中国地方政府应对市场化改革的策略: 抓住经济发展的主动权——理论假说与案例研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2009, 24(4): 1-27, 243.
|
|
[10]
|
郭剑鸣. 解决利益不对称: 行政授权改革的基本路径[J]. 社会科学战线, 2015(7): 163-173.
|
|
[11]
|
王国华. 授权和社区授权——发展中国家地方分权管理的新探索[J]. 中国行政管理, 2002(12): 56-60.
|
|
[12]
|
吴飞飞, 谢雨. 低空经济地方立法及其优化路径研究——基于16部地方低空经济规范的分析[J]. 中国法治, 2025(6): 38-49.
|