英汉学术期刊摘要评价性词汇对比
A Comparative Study of Evaluative Lexicon in English and Chinese Academic Journal Abstracts
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.144307, PDF,   
作者: 胡佳乐：暨南大学华文学院，广东 广州
关键词: 评价性词汇；摘要；评价理论；Evaluative Lexicon； Abstracts； Appraisal Theory
摘要: 研究根据Martin评价理论从态度、介入、极差三个方面对中英学术期刊摘要中的评价性词汇进行对比研究。发现中英文学术期刊在态度系统都频繁使用判断鉴赏资源；在介入系统中文摘要以单声介入为主导，英文摘要以多声为主导；在极差系统中英文摘要都较多使用语势手段。在此基础上分析二者通过评价性词汇表达人际功能的具体差异，以及背后的语境文化原因。期望通过研究揭示两种语言在学术交流中的异同点，进一步提升学术写作的质量和规范性，促进学术交流的有效性和准确性。
Abstract: Based on Martin’s Appraisal Theory, this study conducts a comparative analysis of evaluative lexicon in Chinese and English academic journal abstracts from three dimensions: attitude, engagement, and graduation. The findings reveal that both Chinese and English academic journals frequently employ resources of judgment and appreciation within the attitude system. In the engagement system, Chinese abstracts predominantly adopt monoglossic engagement, while English abstracts favor heteroglossic engagement. In the graduation system, both types of abstracts frequently utilize force strategies. On this basis, the study analyzes the specific differences in how evaluative lexicon expresses interpersonal functions in the two languages, as well as the underlying contextual and cultural reasons. The research aims to uncover similarities and differences between the two languages in academic communication, with the goal of further enhancing the quality and standardization of academic writing and promoting the effectiveness and accuracy of scholarly exchanges.
文章引用：胡佳乐. 英汉学术期刊摘要评价性词汇对比[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(4): 397-403. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.144307

参考文献

[1] 王春梅, 潘伯荣. 科技期刊论文主要贮存信息编辑的规范化[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 1993, 4(4): 34-36.
[2] Martin, J.R. (2000) Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English. In: Evaluation in Text, Oxford University Press, 142-175.
[3] Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[4] Martin, J.R. and White, P.R.R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
[5] 王振华. 评价系统及其运作——系统功能语言学的新发展[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2001(6): 13-20.
[6] 李战子. 话语的人际意义研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2002.
[7] 彭宣维. 现代汉语词语褒贬语义特征的级差性及其基本历时演进类型[J]. 南开语言学刊, 2005(1): 68-75.
[8] 李宗江. 对话中的最简反馈句及其人际功能[J]. 当代修辞学, 2010(5): 74-78.
[9] 王振华. 从态度系统考量奥巴马获2009年度诺贝尔和平奖引发的争议[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010(3): 7-11.
[10] 陈晓燕, 王彦. 英汉社论语篇评价系统对比分析之二——介入资源[J]. 山东外语教学, 2010, 31(6): 20-27.
[11] 蒋国东, 陈许. 对外新闻中的“一带一路”——评价理论介入系统下的话语分析[J]. 外语研究, 2017, 34(5): 6-9.
[12] 王晴. 评价理论下中西方英语灾难性新闻语言对比[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2014.
[13] 李伟. 基于语料库的英汉科技期刊摘要中的评价类词汇对比[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 烟台: 鲁东大学, 2013.
[14] 李梦骁, 韩忠军. 中外学者期刊论文评价性词汇使用的对比研究[J]. 外语教学, 2021, 42(2): 29-34.
[15] Huckin, T.N. and Olsen, L.A. (1983) Writing: Research, Theory, and Applications. Longman.
[16] Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.
[17] Bhatia, V.K. (1993) Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Pearson Education.
[18] Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Longman.
[19] Hyland, K. (2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum.
[20] 杜厚文. 汉语科技文体的语言特点[J]. 语言教学与研究, 1981(2): 87-101.
[21] Hall, E.T. (1976) Beyond Culture. Anchor Press.
[22] Lustig, M.W. and Koester, J. (1998) Interpersonal Communication: Across Cultures. Allyn & Bacon.