股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折的研究进展
Research Progress on Femoral Neck Dynamic Cross Screw System for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures
摘要: 随着人口老龄化的加重，成年人的股骨颈骨折的发生率也在逐年升高，股骨颈骨折也被称为“人生最后一次骨折”，给患者自身以及家庭带来极大的负担。对于这类患者需要尽早行手术治疗，避免患者因长期卧床带来的一系列并发症。对于保髋治疗来讲，手术方式分为空心加压螺钉(CCS)以及最新研发的股骨颈动力交叉钉系统(FNS)等。本文将针对股骨颈动力交叉钉系统的优缺点等方面展开讨论，探讨最新股骨颈骨折内固定方式的研究进展。
Abstract: With the intensification of population aging, the incidence of femoral neck fractures in adults is increasing year by year. Femoral neck fractures are also known as “the last fracture in a lifetime”, which impose a huge burden on patients and their families. Surgical treatment should be performed as soon as possible for such patients to avoid a series of complications caused by long-term bed rest. For hip-preserving therapy, surgical methods include cannulated compression screws (CCS) and the newly developed femoral neck dynamic cross screw system (FNS), among others. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the femoral neck dynamic cross screw system and reviews the research progress of the latest internal fixation methods for femoral neck fractures.
文章引用：曹政, 郜叶标, 陆洪军. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 3434-3439. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641606

参考文献

[1] 周剑, 王锟, 李树祥, 等. 全髋关节与人工股骨头置换手术治疗对老年股骨颈骨折患者手术相关指标及术后疼痛的影响比较[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2026, 39(1): 194-197.
[2] 王辉. 青壮年股骨颈骨折的治疗进展[J]. 中国医学创新, 2022, 19(19): 184-188.
[3] 汪维芳, 张雯雯, 罗晶晶, 等. ERAS理念联合骨科康复护理对股骨颈骨折患者髋关节置换术后疼痛及恢复情况的影响[J]. 中国医药导报, 2024, 21(2): 166-169+174.
[4] 张伟, 陈宇浩, 吴沼锋, 等. 不同内固定方式治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折术后并发症发生率的网状Meta分析[J]. 现代医学, 2024, 52(3): 369-378.
[5] Huang, H., Feng, Z., Wang, W., Yang, C., Liao, J. and Ouyang, J. (2021) Finite Element Analysis of Femoral Neck Fracture Treated with Bidirectional Compression-Limited Sliding Screw. Medical Science Monitor, 27, e929163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Wang, Z., Yang, Y., Feng, G., Guo, H., Chen, Z., Chen, Y., et al. (2022) Biomechanical Comparison of the Femoral Neck System versus InterTan Nail and Three Cannulated Screws for Unstable Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 21, Article No. 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 龚冰南, 曹杰, 张冬福, 等. 克氏针撬拨复位联合股骨颈动力交叉系统治疗股骨颈骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2025, 28(3): 399-403.
[8] Huang, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhou, C., Li, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2023) Comparison of Femoral Neck System and Three Cannulated Cancellous Screws in the Treatment of Vertical Femoral Neck Fractures: Clinical Observation and Finite Element Analysis. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 22, Article No. 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 阿里木江∙玉素甫, 阿卜杜吾普尔∙海比尔, 阿不都拉∙阿不来提, 等. 股骨颈动力交叉钉联合空心钉治疗Pauwels II型中青年股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2025, 29(15): 3095-3100.
[10] Schopper, C., Zderic, I., Menze, J., Müller, D., Rocci, M., Knobe, M., et al. (2020) Higher Stability and More Predictive Fixation with the Femoral Neck System versus Hansson Pins in Femoral Neck Fractures Pauwels II. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 24, 88-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Zeng, H., Yuan, X., Xiang, B. and Zheng, M. (2023) Clinical Application of the Femoral Neck System in Femoral Neck Fractures. Asian Journal of Surgery, 46, 4885-4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 王曦竹, 陈依民, 韩巍, 等. 骨科机器人辅助股骨颈动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折[J]. 中国骨伤, 2024, 37(2): 114-119.
[13] He, C., Lu, Y., Wang, Q., Ren, C., Li, M., Yang, M., et al. (2021) Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of a Femoral Neck System versus Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22, Article No. 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 张彬, 张一, 佘荣峰, 等. 加速康复外科理念下应用股骨颈系统和空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折的近期疗效比较[J]. 骨科临床与研究杂志, 2022, 7(1): 15-21.
[15] 梁辉, 王逸康. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2023, 38(4): 384-386.
[16] 周博, 尹莲平. 股骨颈系统对Pauwels Ⅱ型股骨颈骨折患者的影响[J]. 中外医学研究, 2023, 21(8): 44-47.
[17] Guo, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Cai, Z. and Cai, T. (2024) Clinical Efficacy of Femoral Neck System for Treatment of Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults. Journal of International Medical Research, 52, No. 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Patel, S., Kumar, V., Baburaj, V. and Dhillon, M.S. (2023) The Use of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) Leads to Better Outcomes in the Surgical Management of Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults Compared to Fixation with Cannulated Screws: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 33, 2101-2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 隋聪, 张盛庭, 郭澳, 等. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与空心加压螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2024, 27(3): 400-404.
[20] 刘英科, 陈勤, 陈柯, 等. 两种内固定治疗Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2024, 27(2): 247-251.
[21] 朴海旺, 祖思源, 陈申跳, 等. 股骨颈骨折空心钉内固定术后股骨颈短缩的危险因素分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2023, 38(12): 1238-1241.
[22] 王德斌, 毕郑刚. 内固定和关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折: 如何体现个体化的精准治疗[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25(27): 4395-4400.
[23] Mahajan, R.H., Kumar, S. and Mishra, B. (2017) Technique for Gentle Accurate Reproducible Closed Reduction of Intracapsular Fracture of Neck of Femur. Injury, 48, 789-790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Su, Y., Chen, W., Zhang, Q., Li, B., Li, Z., Guo, M., et al. (2011) An Irreducible Variant of Femoral Neck Fracture: A Minimally Traumatic Reduction Technique. Injury, 42, 140-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Dai, Y., Wang, K., Shen, G., Chen, Y., Hu, A. and Jin, Q. (2025) Tirobot-Assisted versus Freehand Femoral Neck System Placement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 19, Article No. 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] 杨家赵, 周雪锋, 李黎, 等. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统和倒三角空心钉治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2021, 35(9): 1111-1118.

为你推荐