资源拼凑视角下创业网络影响新创企业绩效的作用机制——以电商企业为例
The Mechanism of the Impact of Entrepreneurial Networks on the Performance of New Enterprises from the Perspective of Resource Bricolage—A Case Study of E-Commerce Enterprises
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.154443, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郭 晗*, 宋碧瑶:浙江理工大学科技与艺术学院,浙江 绍兴;陈德虎:浙江理工大学科技与艺术学院,浙江 绍兴;浙江理工大学,浙江 杭州
关键词: 创业网络拼凑新创企业绩效环境动态性Entrepreneurial Networks Bricolage New Venture Performance Environmental Dynamism
摘要: 创业网络在创业活动中起着至关重要的作用。对于新创企业而言,创业拼凑能够有效地利用创业网络的价值。然而,这种方法也有其局限性。基于对195家中国电商领域的新创企业的调查,发现正式网络和非正式网络对新创企业绩效均有显著的积极影响,并且创业拼凑部分中介这些影响。此外,环境动态性会正向调节创业拼凑对创业网络与新创企业绩效关系间的间接影响。研究结果证明了创业拼凑能够作为创业网络发挥作用的关键机制,尤其是在环境不确定性增加的情况下。
Abstract: The entrepreneurial network plays a crucial role in entrepreneurial activities. For new ventures, entrepreneurial bricolage can effectively leverage the value of the entrepreneurial network. However, this approach also has its limitations. Drawing on a survey of 195 Chinese e-commerce new ventures, this study found that both formal and informal networks have significant positive effects on new venture performance, and entrepreneurial bricolage partially mediates these effects. Moreover, environmental dynamism positively moderates the indirect effects of both types of networks, such that the mediating role of bricolage becomes stronger in more dynamic environments. These results suggest that bricolage serves as a crucial mechanism for leveraging entrepreneurial networks, particularly when environmental uncertainty increases.
文章引用:郭晗, 陈德虎, 宋碧瑶. 资源拼凑视角下创业网络影响新创企业绩效的作用机制——以电商企业为例[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(4): 667-675. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.154443

参考文献

[1] Baker, T. and Nelson, R.E. (2005) Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329-366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Yu, X. and Wang, X. (2021) The Effects of Entrepreneurial Bricolage and Alternative Resources on New Venture Capabilities: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 137, 527-537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J. and McColl-Kennedy, J.R. (2013) Competing through Service Innovation: The Role of Bricolage and Entrepreneurship in Project-Oriented Firms. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1085-1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Ferneley, E. and Bell, F. (2006) Using Bricolage to Integrate Business and Information Technology Innovation in SMEs. Technovation, 26, 232-241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Fuglsang, L. (2010) Bricolage and Invisible Innovation in Public Service Innovation. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 5, 67-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Desa, G. and Basu, S. (2013) Optimization or Bricolage? Overcoming Resource Constraints in Global Social Entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7, 26-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Baker, T., Miner, A.S. and Eesley, D.T. (2003) Improvising Firms: Bricolage, Account Giving and Improvisational Competencies in the Founding Process. Research Policy, 32, 255-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Yu, W., Choi, M. and Zheng, J. (2021) How Do Different Types of Entrepreneurial Networks and Decision-Making Influence the Identification of Entrepreneurial Opportunities? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 683285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] John, E. (2024) Show Me Your Networks and I’ll Tell You Your Future: Entrepreneurial Networks and SME Performance. Cogent Business & Management, 11, Article ID: 2363433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Littunen, H. (2000) Networks and Local Environmental Characteristics in the Survival of New Firms. Small Business Economics, 15, 59-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Watson, J. (2007) Modeling the Relationship between Networking and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 852-874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Das, T.K. and Teng, B. (2000) A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management, 26, 31-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Jiang, X., Liu, H., Fey, C. and Jiang, F. (2018) Entrepreneurial Orientation, Network Resource Acquisition, and Firm Performance: A Network Approach. Journal of Business Research, 87, 46-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Parker, S.C. (2008) The Economics of Formal Business Networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 627-640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Windsperger, J., Hendrikse, G.W.J., Cliquet, G. and Ehrmann, T. (2017) Governance and Strategy of Entrepreneurial Networks: An Introduction. Small Business Economics, 50, 671-676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Steffens, P.R., Baker, T., Davidsson, P. and Senyard, J.M. (2022) When Is Less More? Boundary Conditions of Effective Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Journal of Management, 49, 1277-1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Fu, H., Chen, W., Huang, X., Li, M. and Köseoglu, M.A. (2020) Entrepreneurial Bricolage, Ambidexterity Structure, and New Venture Growth: Evidence from the Hospitality and Tourism Sector. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, Article ID: 102355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Ma, T. and Yang, S. (2021) Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on the Performance of New Ventures in China: The Roles of Entrepreneurial Bricolage and Opportunity Recognition. Chinese Management Studies, 16, 924-941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Sonenshein, S. (2014) How Organizations Foster the Creative Use of Resources. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 814-848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Chase, S.R. and Shepherd, D.A. (2025) Waves and Rips: Abalone, Entrepreneurial Variants, and Community Functioning. Journal of Business Venturing, 40, Article ID: 106507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Eisenhardt, K.M., Furr, N.R. and Bingham, C.B. (2010) Crossroads—Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments. Organization Science, 21, 1263-1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Wang, Y., Xue, X. and Guo, H. (2022) The Sustainability of Market Orientation from a Dynamic Perspective: The Mediation of Dynamic Capability and the Moderation of Error Management Climate. Sustainability, 14, Article No. 3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Lyu, T., Guo, Y., Chen, H., Lin, H. and Yu, D. (2022) Network Insight and Entrepreneurial Performance of New Ventures: Understanding the Roles of Resource Integration and Dynamic Management Capability. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 14, 1193-1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P. and Davidsson, P. (2013) Bricolage as a Path to Innovativeness for Resource‐Constrained New Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 211-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 祝振铎, 李非. 创业拼凑、关系信任与新企业绩效实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(7): 108-116.
[26] Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1982) Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Stam, W., Arzlanian, S. and Elfring, T. (2014) Social Capital of Entrepreneurs and Small Firm Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual and Methodological Moderators. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 152-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef