人工智能生成物的著作权保护研究
Research on the Copyright Protection of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Works
摘要: 随着生成式人工智能技术的迅速发展,人工智能生成的文字、图像、音频、视频等内容已广泛进入学习、工作和商业场景。人工智能生成物在提升内容生产效率的同时,也对传统著作权法提出了挑战。现行著作权制度以人类作者为基础,而人工智能生成物在作品认定、独创性判断、作者资格及权利归属等方面均存在较大争议。对于人工智能生成物,既不能一概否定其法律保护,也不宜不加区分地赋予著作权。应当结合具体生成过程,重点考察人类是否对最终表达作出了实质性智力贡献。只有在人的创作意图、选择、安排、修改等因素足以体现个性化表达时,相关成果才具备进入著作权保护范围的基础。基于此,本文主张坚持人类作者中心立场,对人工智能生成物采取分类保护路径,并通过细化独创性标准、明确权利归属规则、完善标识与留痕制度等方式,回应人工智能时代著作权保护面临的新问题。
Abstract: With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence technology, texts, images, audio, and videos generated by artificial intelligence have been extensively utilized in learning, work, and business contexts. The products generated by artificial intelligence have not only enhanced the efficiency of content production but also presented challenges to traditional copyright laws. The current copyright system is centered around human authors. However, there are substantial disputes regarding the identification of works, the assessment of originality, authorship qualifications, and rights attribution in the context of artificial intelligence-generated works. Concerning artificial intelligence-generated works, it is not advisable to simply deny their legal protection, nor should copyright be granted indiscriminately. Instead, the specific generation process should be considered, with a focus on examining whether humans have made substantial intellectual contributions to the final expression. Only when factors such as human creative intention, choice, arrangement, and modification adequately reflect individualized expression can the relevant results have a basis for entering the scope of copyright protection. Based on this, this article advocates adhering to the human author-centered position, adopting a classified protection approach for artificial intelligence-generated works, and addressing the new problems faced by copyright protection in the era of artificial intelligence through measures such as refining the originality standard, clarifying the rights attribution rules, and improving the identification and traceability system.
文章引用:吴越. 人工智能生成物的著作权保护研究[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(4): 273-282. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.124128

参考文献

[1] 马一德, 赵迪雅. 生成式人工智能场景下出版者注意义务的困境与出路[J]. 中国出版, 2025(23): 5-11.
[2] 李霜, 陈嘉霖. 人工智能生成音乐的著作权保护研究[J]. 文化学刊, 2026(1): 171-174.
[3] 徐聪颖. 著作权法规制生成式人工智能数据训练行为的理论争议与路径选择[J]. 河北法学, 2026, 44(3): 97-113.
[4] 焦和平. 论作为新型邻接权的人工智能生成内容制作者权[J]. 法商研究, 2026, 43(1): 102-117.
[5] 徐骏. 生成式人工智能训练: 著作权合理使用制度的价值重构与规制路径[J]. 传播与版权, 2026(3): 139-142.
[6] 王果, 曹梓怡. 人工智能时代著作人身权的困境与疏解[J]. 南京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2026, 39(2): 80-89.
[7] 徐英军, 李根壮. 人工智能生成内容的著作权区分保护机制[J]. 中国软科学, 2026(1): 74-84.
[8] 孙靖洲. 人工智能生成内容的阶梯式保护体系[J]. 法商研究, 2026, 43(1): 118-133.
[9] 魏远山. 生成式人工智能训练数据的准法定许可制度[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2026, 46(1): 79-90.
[10] 沈嘉炜. 人工智能模型知识蒸馏著作权侵权风险规制[J]. 河南科技, 2026, 53(2): 120-124.
[11] 许链. 人工智能新闻作品的版权主体争议及协调[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2024.
[12] 贾鹏. 人工智能创作物的著作权归属研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南政法大学, 2022.
[13] 商珞. 人工智能深度学习著作权合理使用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2024.
[14] 殷奕亮. 人工智能生成物单独设权法律保护路径研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2025.
[15] 汪若蓝. 我国著作权法上适当引用条款研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2023.
[16] 胡开忠, 江璐迪. 纯指令类人工智能生成内容的竞争法保护[J]. 知识产权, 2025(11): 47-68.
[17] 李琛. 重思“表达”概念的规范意义——兼论人工智能用户指令行为的法律性质[J]. 知识产权, 2025(5): 3-20.
[18] 黄细江. 由ChatGPT窥探智能时代我国著作权法坚守与变革[J]. 知识产权, 2024(8): 114-126.
[19] 祝建军. 生成式人工智能著作权侵权问题研究[J]. 知识产权, 2025(2): 44-60.
[20] 陈杰. 论知识产权对象与知识产权客体的区分[J]. 知识产权, 2024(4): 38-56.