影视解说类短视频转换性使用的侵权责任认定标准研究
Research on the Criteria for Determining Infringement Liability of Transformative Use in Film and Television Commentary Short Videos
摘要: 随着短视频产业的爆发式增长,影视解说类短视频在满足大众碎片化审美需求的同时,也引发了剧烈的著作权博弈。传统的长短视频之争折射出原作品演绎权与二次创作表达权之间的深层矛盾。本文通过对影视解说视频的分类研究,指出当前司法实践中依赖三步检验法进行量化认定的局限性。本文认为规制路径应从立法、司法、产业三个层面协同推进。旨在寻求版权保护与创作自由之间的动态平衡,为我国视听产业的法治化、规范化发展提供理论参考。
Abstract: With the explosive growth of the short-video industry, film and television commentary short videos have met the public’s fragmented aesthetic needs while triggering intense copyright game. The traditional dispute between long and short videos reflects the deep-seated contradiction between the right of adaptation of original works and the right of expression in secondary creation. Based on a classified study of film and television commentary videos, this paper points out the limitations of quantitative determination relying on the three-step test in current judicial practice. It argues that the regulatory approach should be promoted coordinately from three dimensions: legislation, judicature and industry. This paper aims to seek a dynamic balance between copyright protection and creative freedom, and provide a theoretical reference for the law-based and standardized development of China’s audio-visual industry.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
朱文玉, 姜彬彬. 转换性使用视角下二次创作短视频合法性探析[J]. 学术交流, 2022(3): 55-66.
|
|
[2]
|
余祥, 聂建强. 影视解说类短视频的著作权侵权分析和法律规制[J]. 法治论坛, 2024(1): 310-318.
|
|
[3]
|
易玲, 邢佳忆. 重混创作行为的著作权法规制研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 34(6): 133-139.
|
|
[4]
|
张子帆, 王勇. 电影电视解说类短视频版权问题探析[J]. 新闻传播, 2021(15): 51-52.
|
|
[5]
|
李佳妮. 论著作权合理使用中的适当引用——以谷阿莫二次创作短视频为例[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 21(S1): 53-57.
|
|
[6]
|
潘倩文. 解构与重构: 影视解说类短视频的叙述视角探析[J]. 艺海, 2024(5): 110-113.
|
|
[7]
|
梁志文. 论演绎权的保护范围[J]. 中国法学, 2015(5): 186-206.
|
|
[8]
|
华劼. 版权转换性使用规则研究——以挪用艺术的合理使用判定为视角[J]. 科技与法律, 2019(4): 26-33.
|
|
[9]
|
相靖. Campbell案以来美国著作权合理使用制度的演变[J]. 知识产权, 2016(12): 82-90.
|