数字经济背景下电商企业财务分析与优化研究——以京东集团为例
Financial Analysis and Optimization Research of E-Commerce Enterprises in the Context of the Digital Economy—A Case Study of JD.com
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.154449, PDF,   
作者: 周茜文, 陈海宁*:江苏大学财经学院,江苏 镇江
关键词: 京东集团财务分析盈利能力流动性JD.com Financial Analysis Profitability Liquidity
摘要: 近年来,互联网经济迅猛发展,网络零售产业成为拉动中国经济增长的新引擎。而京东集团股份有限公司是我国大型综合电商平台之一,在激烈的市场竞争以及社会经济转型的过程中,京东集团股份有限公司的财务报表质量及其业绩表现也受到了广泛关注。笔者基于京东集团股份有限公司最近几年(2020~2024年度)财务报告资料,采用比率分析法、趋势分析法、结构分析法对京东集团股份有限公司财务报表质量进行评价。对公司的成长能力、利润能力、营运能力和偿债能力进行分析评价发现:京东公司盈利稳定性不足,销售净利率波动较大;营运能力呈现分化,存货周转改善但应收账款周转明显下滑;资本结构总体稳健,但短期流动性趋紧,财务杠杆温和上升。对此,本文从拓展高附加值业务、强化信用与营运资金管理、控制财务杠杆等方面提出建议,以期为公司实现健康、可持续发展提供参考。
Abstract: In recent years, the rapid development of the internet economy has made online retail a new engine driving China’s economic growth. As one of China’s large comprehensive e-commerce platforms, JD.com, Inc. has attracted widespread attention regarding the quality of its financial statements and operational performance amidst fierce market competition and ongoing socio-economic transformation. Based on the financial report data of JD.com, Inc. from 2020 to 2024, this paper evaluates the quality of its financial statements using ratio analysis, trend analysis, and structural analysis. The analysis of the company’s growth capability, profitability, operational capacity, and solvency reveals the following: the company’s profit stability is insufficient, with significant fluctuations in net profit margin; operational capabilities show divergence, as inventory turnover has improved while accounts receivable turnover has declined noticeably; although the capital structure remains generally sound, short-term liquidity has tightened marginally, and financial leverage has risen moderately. Accordingly, this paper puts forward recommendations such as expanding high value-added business lines, strengthening credit and working capital management, and controlling financial leverage, with the aim of supporting the company’s healthy and sustainable development.
文章引用:周茜文, 陈海宁. 数字经济背景下电商企业财务分析与优化研究——以京东集团为例[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(4): 723-731. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.154449

参考文献

[1] Timmers, P. (1998) Business Models for Electronic Markets. Electronic Markets, 8, 3-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Feng, Y. and Cao, F. (2018) The Financial Risk Research of E-Commerce Enterprise Base on Harvard Analytical Framework—Taking Alibaba as an Example. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Humanities Science and Society Development (ICHSSD 2017), Xiamen, 18-19 November 2017, 55-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 罗珉, 李亮宇. 互联网时代的商业模式创新: 价值创造视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(1): 95-107.
[4] 宋璐, 王东升. 商业模式中的财务要素——基于商业模式表达方式的文献回顾[J]. 会计之友, 2017(1): 14-19.
[5] 刘运国, 郭瑞营, 张新宇. 运用财务报告分析垂直电商的商业模式——以唯品会为例[J]. 财会月刊, 2024, 45(5): 102-106.
[6] 孟涛, 王春娟, 范鹏辉. 数字经济视域下跨境电商高质量发展对策研究[J]. 国际贸易, 2022(10): 60-67.
[7] 李如秒. 中国跨境电商发展评估与提升策略[J]. 浙江学刊, 2020(3): 151-156.
[8] 梁嘉慧. 全球价值链嵌入视角下数字产业渗透水平对跨境电商发展的影响[J]. 商业经济研究, 2023(24): 157-160.
[9] 庄婉婷, 刘焰, 林源. 多元化与纵向一体化企业财务战略绩效对比研究——以SJ公司为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2017(32): 81-86.
[10] 谷增军. 公司总体战略与财务战略匹配的触发器设计[J]. 华东经济管理, 2016, 30(12): 129-134.
[11] 柴源源. 基于财务战略矩阵的公司财务战略选择[J]. 财会通讯, 2019(8): 66-70.
[12] 葛家澍, 占美松. 企业财务报告分析必须着重关注的几个财务信息——流动性、财务适应性、预期现金净流入、盈利能力和市场风险[J]. 会计研究, 2008(5): 3-9, 95.
[13] 曹晓丽. 财务分析方法与财务分析中存在的问题[J]. 财经问题研究, 2014(S2): 73-75.
[14] 高寒. 上市公司财务指标分析[J]. 经济师, 2018(2): 99-100.
[15] 王诗雨, 陈志红. 企业财务风险衍化及其产业效应——基于规制环境和竞争环境双重情境分析[J]. 会计研究, 2018(11): 56-62.
[16] 王昕. 大数据对电商企业财务风险管理的影响分析[J]. 人民论坛∙学术前沿, 2019(24): 122-125.
[17] 刘武. 财务报表分析综述[J]. 会计师, 2018(24): 29-31.
[18] 黄世忠. 财务报表分析的逻辑框架——基于微软和三大汽车公司的案例分析[J]. 财务与会计, 2007(19): 14-19.
[19] Chu, P.L., Vanderghem, C., MacLean, H.L. and Saville, B.A. (2017) Financial Analysis and Risk Assessment of Hydroprocessed Renewable Jet Fuel Production from Camelina, Carinata and Used Cooking Oil. Applied Energy, 198, 401-409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 苗凯. 财务管理目标与企业财务战略选择[J]. 纳税, 2021, 15(29): 79-80.
[21] Guzzo, T., Ferri, F. and Grifoni, P. (2016) A Model of E-Commerce Adoption (MOCA): Consumer’s Perceptions and Behaviours. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35, 196-209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef