基于非接触测量的陶粒混凝土预制底板平截面假定验证
Verification of Plane Section Hypothesis for Precast Ceramsite Concrete Base Plate Using Non-Contact Measurement
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2026.154094, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郭常达, 王 娟*, 夏煜星, 蒙福茂, 郭俊铭, 梁俊杰:湖南科技大学土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭
关键词: 预制底板陶粒混凝土DIC监测平截面假定Precast Base Plate Ceramsite Concrete DIC Monitoring Plane Section Assumption
摘要: 为验证陶粒混凝土预制底板在受弯过程中是否满足平截面假定,本研究设计并制作了1块尺寸为3600 mm × 1100 mm × 80 mm的足尺试件,采用普通混凝土与陶粒混凝土组合结构,内部嵌入空心保温模具以提升保温隔热性能。通过堆载试验获取试件在各级荷载下的位移、混凝土应变、钢筋应变及裂缝发展数据,系统分析其受力全过程。试验结果表明:试件破坏时跨中挠度达112.2 mm,呈现典型延性破坏特征;荷载-位移曲线可分为弹性、裂缝发展和破坏三个阶段,反映了截面刚度退化与内力重分布过程;混凝土应变在开裂后非线性增长,中性轴显著上移;钢筋应变在开裂后快速增长,极限状态前接近屈服阈值。跨中截面应变分布和DIC应变演化图像显示,开裂前(P ≤ 0.2 Fu)截面应变呈线性分布,符合平截面假定;开裂后受拉区应变偏离线性,但受压区仍保持线性;极限阶段(P ≥ 0.9 Fu)受压区非线性加剧。综上,陶粒混凝土预制底板在整体受力过程中基本满足平截面假定,为同类复合结构的设计与分析提供了试验依据和理论支撑。
Abstract: To verify the validity of the plane section assumption for precast ceramsite concrete base plates under bending, a full-scale specimen with dimensions of 3600 mm × 1100 mm × 80 mm was designed and fabricated, featuring a composite structure of ordinary concrete and ceramsite concrete with embedded hollow thermal insulation molds. Pile loading tests were conducted to obtain displacement, concrete strain, reinforcement strain, and crack development data at various load levels, enabling systematic analysis of the entire mechanical response. The results indicate that the specimen exhibits typical ductile failure characteristics with a mid-span deflection of 112.2 mm at ultimate state. The load-deflection curve demonstrates three distinct stages: elastic, crack development, and failure, reflecting section stiffness degradation and internal force redistribution. Concrete strain increases nonlinearly after cracking with significant upward shifting of the neutral axis, while reinforcement strain increases rapidly and approaches the yield threshold prior to ultimate state. Strain distribution at the mid-span section and DIC strain evolution images reveal that strain follows a linear distribution before cracking (P ≤ 0.2 Fu), consistent with the plane section assumption. After cracking, tensile zone strain deviates from linearity whereas compressive zone strain remains linear; nonlinearity in the compression zone intensifies at the ultimate stage (P ≥ 0.9 Fu). In conclusion, the precast ceramsite concrete base plate essentially satisfies the plane section assumption throughout the loading process, providing experimental basis and theoretical support for the design and analysis of similar composite structures.
文章引用:郭常达, 王娟, 夏煜星, 蒙福茂, 郭俊铭, 梁俊杰. 基于非接触测量的陶粒混凝土预制底板平截面假定验证[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(4): 202-214. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.154094

参考文献

[1] Pei, J., Pan, X., Lv, Z., Yu, H., Tu, G. and Jiang, F. (2024) Synergistic Mechanism to Prepare Ultra-Lightweight Ceramsite Using Multiple Industrial Solid Wastes. Construction and Building Materials, 425, Article 136139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Huang, W., Gong, M., Huang, Q., Liu, Z., Wang, J., Xue, F., et al. (2025) Research Progress on the Industrial Solid Waste-Based Ceramsite: Composition, Curing and Application. Materials Today Communications, 49, Article 113769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 赵增丰, 蒲紫盈, 林璨, 等. 免烧陶粒及陶粒混凝土性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(20): 84-96.
[4] 陈宇良, 李浩, 吴辉琴, 等. 三向受压状态下轻骨料混凝土的变形性能及损伤分析[J]. 实验力学, 2021, 36(5): 668-676.
[5] 刘雨姗, 庞建勇, 姚韦靖. 页岩陶粒轻骨料混凝土高温后蠕变特性[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2021, 24(5): 1096-1104.
[6] 李玉平, 虞秀勇, 胡胜. 轻骨料混凝土吸声性能研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 48(12): 112-119.
[7] 王建民, 肖自强, 范奕涛, 等. 组合混凝土界面粘结性能多因素正交试验分析[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(2): 87-92.
[8] Wang, X., Sun, H., Hou, Y. and Li, Y. (2024) Study on Seismic Performance of Steel Frame Installed New-Type Lightweight Concrete Composite Exterior Wallboard. Buildings, 14, Article 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ma, S., Li, L. and Bao, P. (2021) Seismic Performance Test of Double-Row Reinforced Ceramsite Concrete Composite Wall Panels with Cores. Applied Sciences, 11, Article 2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Bu, C.M., Yang, H.Y., Sun, Y., et al. (2020) Experimental Study on Flexural Performance of Fabricated Ceramsite Concrete Lightweight Wall Panel. E3S Web of Conferences, 204, Article 1007.
[11] Gao, C., Li, Z., Ma, H., Li, M., Shi, N. and Tian, S. (2025) Study on the Flexural Performance of Composite Wall Panels with Ceramsite Foam Concrete and Normal Concrete. Buildings, 16, Article 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 王新堂, 窦华坤, 梧松. 冷弯薄壁钢-陶粒混凝土组合楼板静载性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2019(S1): 54-60.
[13] 孟郅恒, 王新堂, 刘链波. 冷弯薄壁钢-陶粒混凝土组合楼板火灾响应试验研究[J]. 空间结构, 2021, 27(1): 52-59+36.
[14] Li, L., Ma, S., Bao, P. and Wang, H. (2022) Effect of Hidden Column Type on Seismic Performance of the Insulated Sandwich Wall Panel Joints with Ceramsite Concrete Layer. Buildings, 12, Article 2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Sun, J., Li, R.Y.M., Jiao, T., Wang, S., Deng, C. and Zeng, L. (2022) Research on the Development and Joint Improvement of Ceramsite Lightweight High-Titanium Heavy Slag Concrete Precast Composite Slab. Buildings, 13, Article 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Chen, D., Ding, Q., Zhang, G., Zhou, P., Deng, Y., Wan, C., et al. (2025) Development and Characteristics of Sustainable Ultra-High Performance Concrete Utilizing Coal Gangue Ceramsite. Construction and Building Materials, 459, Article 139676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 张延宾, 谷倩, 雷晓天, 等. 大尺寸大开间页岩陶粒混凝土双向叠合板足尺试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2021, 51(2): 27-33+112.
[18] 普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准, GB/T 50081-2002 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2003.
[19] 轻骨料混凝土结构技术规程, JGJ 12-2006 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2006.
[20] 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分: 室温试验方法GB/T 228.1-2021 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2021.
[21] 混凝土结构试验方法标准, GB/T 50152-2012 [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.