虚拟社会信息隐私悖论:从遮蔽到透明
The Information Privacy Paradox in the Virtual Society: From Concealment to Transparency
摘要: 大数据时代,虚拟社会的空间虚拟性与身份离身性使个体得以隐匿现实身份,建构多重自我,形成主体遮蔽的幻象。然而,大数据技术的深度嵌入使每一个数字足迹都被记录、整合与挖掘,个体自以为隐匿的同时,其完整人格正被算法从碎片信息中拼凑还原。本文旨在从伦理学视角剖析这一“从遮蔽到透明”的悖论,揭示其内在机理。通过分析虚拟社会中主体身份遮蔽的幻象与大数据技术透视下的信息透明化过程,本文论证了该悖论的本质并非主体隐藏能力的增强,而是监控权力的扩张,使个体在不知情中沦为可计算、可预测的数据客体。研究结果表明,在透明的网络空间中,不存在真正的伦理真空,主体必须承担相应的责任。信息隐私保护的伦理根基在于对人的尊严的尊重,唯有在主体自觉、算法问责与共同体建设的协同作用下,虚拟社会才能摆脱监控的阴影,成为真正的伦理共同体。
Abstract: In the era of big data, the spatial virtuality and disembodied nature of the virtual society enable individuals to conceal their real-world identities and construct multiple selves, creating an illusion of subjective concealment. However, the deep integration of big data technologies means that every digital footprint is recorded, integrated, and mined. While individuals believe themselves to be hidden, their complete personalities are being pieced together and restored by algorithms from fragmented information. This paper aims to analyze this paradox of “from concealment to transparency” from an ethical perspective and reveal its internal mechanism. By examining the illusion of subjective identity concealment in the virtual society and the process of information transparency under big data surveillance, this paper demonstrates that the essence of this paradox is not an enhancement of the subject’s ability to hide, but an expansion of surveillance power, which reduces individuals to calculable and predictable data objects without their knowledge. The findings indicate that in a transparent cyberspace, there is no true ethical vacuum, and subjects must assume corresponding responsibilities. The ethical foundation of information privacy protection lies in respect for human dignity. Only through the synergistic effect of subject awareness, algorithmic accountability, and community building can the virtual society escape the shadow of surveillance and become a true ethical community.
文章引用:史锦慧. 虚拟社会信息隐私悖论:从遮蔽到透明[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(4): 374-379. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.154175

参考文献

[1] [美]约书亚·梅罗维茨. 消失的地域: 电子媒介对社会行为的影响[M]. 肖志军, 译. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2002.
[2] 陈志良. 虚拟: 人类中介系统的革命[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2000, 14(4): 57-63.
[3] 卢恰诺·弗罗里迪. 信息伦理学[M]. 薛平, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2018.
[4] 米歇尔·福柯. 规训与惩罚: 监狱的诞生[M]. 刘北成, 杨远婴, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1999.
[5] Zuboff, S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Public Affairs.
[6] Hayles, N.K. (1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 陆岷峰. 大语言模型在金融端的应用原理、挑战及落地路径研究[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 41(4): 1-12.
[8] 王腾, 樊坤渭, 张瑶. 面向分布式学习的多密钥同态加密与差分隐私融合方案[J]. 信息网络安全, 2026, 26(2): 236-250.
[9] 邹智贤, 陆俊. 论网络“自我” [J]. 求索, 2001(1): 84-87.
[10] Jonas, H. (1984) The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 埃德加·莫兰. 伦理[M]. 于硕, 译. 上海: 学林出版社, 2017.
[12] 甘绍平. 应用伦理学前沿问题研究[M]. 南昌: 江西人民出版社, 2002.
[13] Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012) Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef