肾衰竭患者CRRT治疗期间心理痛苦现状及 心理护理干预效果分析
Analysis of Psychological Distress Status and the Effectiveness of Psychological Nursing Interventions in Patients with Renal Failure during CRRT Treatment
摘要: 目的:探讨肾衰竭患者连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)期间心理痛苦的现状,并分析针对性心理护理干预的临床效果,为临床缓解患者心理痛苦、改善治疗结局提供参考依据。方法:选取本院2022年1月至2023年12月收治的86例接受CRRT治疗的肾衰竭患者作为研究对象,采用便利抽样法分为对照组(43例)和观察组(43例)。对照组实施CRRT常规护理,观察组在常规护理基础上实施针对性心理护理干预,干预周期为患者CRRT治疗全程(平均14.52 ± 3.76天)。采用心理痛苦温度计(DT)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评估患者干预前后心理痛苦、焦虑及抑郁现状;比较两组患者治疗依从性、并发症发生率及护理满意度。结果:干预前,86例患者中,无心理痛苦12例(13.95%),轻度心理痛苦28例(32.56%),中度心理痛苦30例(34.88%),重度心理痛苦16例(18.60%);SAS评分为(56.78 ± 7.25)分,SDS评分为(58.34 ± 7.56)分,均处于中度焦虑、抑郁水平。干预后,观察组DT评分、SAS评分、SDS评分分别为(2.15 ± 1.02)分、(42.36 ± 5.89)分、(43.18 ± 6.05)分,显著低于对照组的(4.87 ± 1.35)分、(52.17 ± 6.98)分、(53.69 ± 7.12)分,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);观察组治疗依从性(95.35%)、护理满意度(97.67%)显著高于对照组的(79.07%)、(83.72%),并发症发生率(6.98%)显著低于对照组的(23.26%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:肾衰竭患者CRRT治疗期间普遍存在不同程度的心理痛苦,以中度心理痛苦为主,且伴随明显的焦虑、抑郁情绪;实施针对性心理护理干预,可有效缓解患者心理痛苦及负面情绪,提高治疗依从性,降低并发症发生率,提升护理满意度,改善患者治疗体验及临床结局,值得临床推广应用。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the status of psychological distress in patients with renal failure during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and to analyze the clinical effects of targeted psychological nursing interventions, so as to provide a reference for clinical practice in alleviating patients’ psychological distress and improving treatment outcomes. Methods: Eighty-six patients with renal failure who received CRRT treatment in our hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected as study subjects and divided into a control group (43 cases) and an observation group (43 cases) using convenience sampling. The control group received routine CRRT care, while the observation group received targeted psychological nursing interventions in addition to routine care. The intervention period lasted throughout the patients’ CRRT treatment (average 14.52 ± 3.76 days). The Distress Thermometer (DT), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to assess the patients’ psychological distress, anxiety, and depression before and after the intervention. Treatment compliance, complication rates, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results: Before the intervention, among the 86 patients, 12 (13.95%) had no psychological distress, 28 (32.56%) had mild psychological distress, 30 (34.88%) had moderate psychological distress, and 16 (18.60%) had severe psychological distress. The SAS score was (56.78 ± 7.25) points, and the SDS score was (58.34 ± 7.56) points, indicating moderate levels of anxiety and depression. After the intervention, the observation group had significantly lower DT, SAS, and SDS scores [(2.15 ± 1.02), (42.36 ± 5.89), and (43.18 ± 6.05) points, respectively] compared to the control group [(4.87 ± 1.35), (52.17 ± 6.98), and (53.69 ± 7.12) points, respectively], with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The observation group also showed significantly higher treatment compliance (95.35%) and nursing satisfaction (97.67%) compared to the control group (79.07% and 83.72%, respectively), and a significantly lower complication rate (6.98%) compared to the control group (23.26%), with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with renal failure undergoing CRRT commonly experience varying degrees of psychological distress, predominantly moderate distress, accompanied by significant anxiety and depression. Implementing targeted psychological nursing interventions can effectively alleviate psychological distress and negative emotions, improve treatment compliance, reduce complication rates, enhance nursing satisfaction, and improve patients’ treatment experience and clinical outcomes, making it worthy of clinical promotion and application.
文章引用:高宏媛, 赵立. 肾衰竭患者CRRT治疗期间心理痛苦现状及 心理护理干预效果分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 4112-4120. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641679

参考文献

[1] 孙倩倩, 孙少洋, 李圆章, 等. 连续性肾脏替代治疗仪器设备维护管理方案的构建与应用[J]. 中国临床护理, 2026(3): 168-174.
[2] Nakano, H., Horie, R., Gondo, T., Inoue, Y., Inokuchi, R. and Doi, K. (2026) Trajectory Pattern of Serum Urea Nitrogen to Creatinine Ratio in Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study. Journal of Critical Care, 94, Article 155522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 周晓冬, 梁新蕊, 郁姣, 等. 连续性肾脏替代治疗护理能力测评工具的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 上海护理, 2026, 26(3): 13-16.
[4] Hirwe, A., Omar, E., Guinot, P., Beurton, A., Nesseler, N., Mansour, A., et al. (2026) Comparison between Regional Citrate Anticoagulation and Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Retrospective Multicentric Study. Annals of Intensive Care, 16, Article 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Ju, H.L., Taehee, K., Heeyoung, L., et al. (2026) Prognostic Factors of 30-Day In-Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Journal of Nursing Research, 34, e442.
[6] 吴会军, 邓雅琴. 基于SBAR设计的交班表在连续性肾脏替代治疗护理交班中的应用[J]. 全科护理, 2026, 24(5): 888-891.
[7] 刘金涛, 杨通菊, 杨涛, 等. 低分子肝素抗凝与连续性肾脏替代治疗老年ICU脓毒症患者的临床效果及安全性[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2026, 46(5): 866-870.
[8] Ice, S., Pellegrino, B., Diab, A., Parravani, A., Poling, M., Sakhuja, A., et al. (2026) Discontinuation of Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Pilot Study. Journal of Critical Care, 94, Article 155505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Sheng, Q., Tan, Y., Huang, X., He, T., Li, X., Huang, Y., et al. (2026) Critical Care Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding Hypothermia Management during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Nursing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 陈玲, 周嘉琦, 张明静, 等. ICU连续性肾脏替代治疗中质量控制干预方案的构建及应用价值研究[J/OL]. 中国典型病例大全, 1-6. 2026-04-20.[CrossRef
[11] 韩娟, 游宁, 张蜜, 等. 基于培训迁移模型的重症专科护士连续性肾脏替代治疗培训方案的应用实践[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2026, 41(4): 341-347.
[12] 洪陈芳, 徐哲, 李卓杰, 等. 早期红细胞分布宽度与脓毒症患者启动连续性肾脏替代治疗的关系研究[J/OL]. 重庆医科大学学报, 1-9. 2026-04-20.[CrossRef
[13] Liu, X., Li, M., Wu, R., Ma, J., Shen, C., Yang, X., et al. (2026) Risk Prediction Model for Unplanned Weaning during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medicina Intensiva, 50, Article 502361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Awawdeh, Y., Abu Ejheisheh, M., Ayed, A., Aqtam, I. and Batran, A. (2026) Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Clinicians Regarding Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Critical Care Patients in Southern Palestine. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, 49, 225-234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 文静, 关黎, 段永春, 等. 连续性肾脏替代治疗成功救治急性四聚乙醛中毒1例[J]. 中国工业医学杂志, 2026, 39(1): 48-51.
[16] Jia, L., Wei, J., Zhu, K., Wang, X. and Sun, Y. (2026) Summary of Best Evidence for Nutritional Management in Adult Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Frontiers in Medicine, 13, Article ID: 1749845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Shah, O.M. (2026) Management of Combined Lacosamide and Levetiracetam Toxicity with Intravenous 8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. BMJ Case Reports, 19, e271462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 李静静, 王丽姣, 孙长丽, 等. 连续性肾脏替代治疗联合静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合患者预后的影响因素分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2026, 54(2): 195-199.
[19] Tran, K., Bach, D., Wilkins, G.M., Brar, P.S., Yamada, Z. and El-Hefnawy, T. (2026) Clinical Staging versus Biomarker-Guided Initiation of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus, 18, e103128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Chen, Y., Feng, F., Li, Q., Yang, H. and Yang, W. (2026) Safety and Effectiveness of Nafamostat Mesylate in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Open Medicine, 21, Article 20251369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 陶宁宁, 王海超, 苏月琴. 连续性肾脏替代治疗联合血液灌流对脓毒症急性肾损伤患者的疗效[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2026, 46(2): 267-272.
[22] Eguchi, M., Nakazawa, D., Shimizu, T., Imai-Kawae, Y., Watanabe-Kusunoki, K., Hattanda, F., et al. (2026) Mobile Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy for Appropriate Radioactive Iodine Administration in a Hemodialysis Patient: A Case Report. Renal Replacement Therapy, 12, Article No. 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] 王丽娜, 余璐, 徐海婷. 连续性肾脏替代治疗严重多发伤合并急性肾损伤患者的疗效及预后分析[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2026, 21(1): 84-88.
[24] 张晓辉, 赵淑霞. 急性重症胰腺炎继发血流感染伴肥胖1例连续性肾脏替代治疗下万古霉素的药学监护[J]. 中国乡村医药, 2026, 33(2): 35-36.
[25] Mohamed, T. and Muszynski, J. (2026) Leveraging Machine Learning for Hemodynamic Phenotyping in Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy—Toward Precision Monitoring. Pediatric Research. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] 魏娜. 肾衰竭患者心理灵活性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国典型病例大全, 2025, 19(4): 637-641.
[27] 曾宪欣, 余伟. 心理疏导联合多维度阶段式护理在慢性肾衰竭患者药物治疗期间的效果[J]. 中国药物滥用防治杂志, 2025, 31(11): 2137-2140.
[28] 梁润鸿, 刘淑贞, 吴亚霞. 慢性肾衰竭维持性血液透析患者心理脆弱现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 心理月刊, 2025, 20(11): 25-27.
[29] 黄燕. 终末期肾衰竭血透患者心理痛苦现状及其相关影响因素分析[J]. 安徽医专学报, 2024, 23(4): 149-151.