医患共同决策模式与中老年尿毒症患者 血液透析疗效相关性
Correlation between the Shared Decision-Making Model and Hemodialysis Efficacy in Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Uremia
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1641685, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘俣一*, 沙 莎, 常婧一, 钱雨悦:南通大学杏林学院医学部,江苏 南通;曹可怡, 肖 静, 叶长青#:南通大学公共卫生学院,江苏 南通
关键词: 尿毒症医患共同决策血液透析疗效Uremia Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Hemodialysis Efficacy
摘要: 目的:本研究通过横断面研究设计,探讨医患共同决策模式与中老年尿毒症患者血液透析治疗效果的关系。方法:纳入2024年1月至2024年6月期间,在兴化市裕丰血透中心接受治疗的183例尿毒症患者,并收集医患双方的有效量表数据。采用中文版医患共同决策量表评估医患共同决策程度,根据SDM-Q-AVG分数进行K-Means聚类分析,分为高(n = 58)、中(n = 58)和低(n = 67)三类共同决策组。收集患者临床、实验室和透析等关键指标。数据分析采用SPSS27.0,对医患共同决策量表进行信效度检验,通过卡方检验,方差分析,回归分析影响血液透析疗效的因素,并在不同医患共同决策模式下分析决策得分与血液透析疗效的相关性。结果:医患低共同决策组的年龄更大,肌酐更高、尿酸更高,尿素更高,脱水量达标率更低(均p < 0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析提示,医患共同决策的程度与中老年尿毒症患者血液透析疗效有关(p < 0.05, p < 0.001)。多元回归和相关性分析提示,医患共同决策程度与透析疗效有正相关性,且在医患共同决策程度较低的群体中相关性更为显著。结论:医患共同决策模式在预测中老年尿毒症患者血液透析治疗效果中具有重要作用。在血液透析前应用医患共同决策模式并及早进行干预,可能有助于提高血液透析的疗效。
Abstract: Objective: This study explored the relationship between the doctor-patient shared decision-making (SDM) model and the outcome of haemodialysis treatment in middle-aged and elderly uremic patients through a cross-sectional research design. Methods: One hundred and eighty-three patients with uremia who received treatment at Xinghua Yufeng Haemodialysis Centre between January 2024 and June 2024 were included, and validated scale data were collected from both doctors and patients. The Chinese version of the Doctor-Patient Shared Decision Making Scale was used to assess the degree of doctor-patient shared decision making, and K-Means cluster analysis was performed based on the SDM-Q-AVG scores, which were divided into three types of shared decision-making groups: high (n = 58), medium (n = 58) and low (n = 67). Key clinical, laboratory and dialysis indicators of patients were collected. Data were analysed using SPSS27.0, and the doctor-patient shared decision-making scale was tested for reliability and validity, and the factors affecting the efficacy of haemodialysis were analysed by chi-square test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression, and the correlation between the decision-making scores and the efficacy of haemodialysis was analysed under different doctor-patient shared decision-making modes. Results: The doctor-patient low shared decision-making group was older, had higher creatinine, higher uric acid, higher urea, and lower dehydration compliance (all p < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis suggested that the degree of doctor-patient shared decision-making was associated with haemodialysis outcomes in middle-aged and elderly uremic patients (p < 0.05, p < 0.001). Multiple regression and correlation analyses suggested that the degree of doctor-patient shared decision-making was positively correlated with dialysis outcomes, and the correlation was more significant in the group with a lower degree of doctor-patient shared decision-making. Conclusion: The doctor-patient shared decision-making model plays an important role in predicting the outcome of haemodialysis treatment in middle-aged and elderly uremic patients. Applying the patient-physician shared decision-making model before haemodialysis and intervening early may help to improve the efficacy of haemodialysis.
文章引用:刘俣一, 沙莎, 曹可怡, 常婧一, 钱雨悦, 肖静, 叶长青. 医患共同决策模式与中老年尿毒症患者 血液透析疗效相关性[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 4160-4168. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641685

参考文献

[1] 徐金荣. 综合性护理在血液透析联合血液灌流治疗尿毒症患者护理中的应用价值分析[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2024, 28(35): 87-89, 93.
[2] 张丽, 贾英杰, 赵倩, 等. 基于GNRI分析血液透析联合血液灌流对糖尿病肾病尿毒症患者生存预后的价值[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2024, 44(12): 2870-2875.
[3] 白琼, 唐雯. 医患共同决策在慢性肾衰竭治疗中的应用现状[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2022, 22(1): 72-76.
[4] 廖玉, 李建省. 基于人文关怀的细节性护理在尿毒症患者血液透析治疗中的应用[J]. 西藏医药, 2024, 45(2): 122-124.
[5] Kriston, L., Scholl, I., Hölzel, L., Simon, D., Loh, A. and Härter, M. (2010) The 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and Psychometric Properties in a Primary Care Sample. Patient Education and Counseling, 80, 94-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 罗碧华, 肖水源. 中文版医患共同决策量表患者版的信效度[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2019, 44(7): 823-829.
[7] 李福明, 滕悦, 刘柳, 等. 医患共同决策在中医药技术抗肿瘤过程中的应用分析[J]. 中国医院管理, 2022, 42(8): 16-19.
[8] 唐盛, 龚智峰, 彭小梅, 等. 老年终末期肾病患者流行病学调查分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2009, 29(3): 613-614.
[9] 靳子恒, 宋洁, 李汝钊, 等. 老年维持性血液透析病人衰弱研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2024, 38(24): 4507-4512.
[10] 黄榕翀, 丁怀玉, 郭宏洲. 医患共同决策模式在我国临床实践中的应用与改进[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2020, 48(10): 890-894.
[11] 白琼, 唐雯, 王悦. 基于“四主题理论”的慢性肾衰竭诊疗伦理问题分析——以慢性肾衰竭患者拒绝血液透析为例[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2021, 12(6): 1034-1038.
[12] 张涤华. 基于终末期肾病患者共享决策下的自动腹膜透析治疗[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 4(12): 1613-1618.
[13] 丁文艳. 医患共享决策在血液透析患者中的应用[J]. 现代实用医学, 2020, 32(9): 1124-1126.
[14] 廉荷仙, 刘静. 个性化封管液选择方案在中心静脉置管血透患者中的应用效果[J]. 医药卫生科技, 2021, 27(6): 1061-1062.
[15] 熊巨洋, 朱璇, 马赫. 医患共同决策对老年慢性病共病患者家庭医生签约服务质量的影响[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2024, 17(8): 1-9.
[16] 陶明芬, 王翠珍, 刘欢, 等. 维持性血液透析患者症状困扰及影响因素研究[J]. 医学食疗与健康, 2020, 18(6): 50-51.
[17] 赵羚谷, 许卫卫, 王颖, 等. 我国临床实践中的医患共同决策流程设计和挑战[J]. 医学与哲学, 2019, 40(18): 1-6, 22.