高龄孕妇产前筛查与产前诊断策略评估
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostic Strategies in Advanced Maternal Age
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1641703, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 农丽颜, 朱梦洁, 张素华, 居 云, 傅 丹*:扬州大学附属苏北人民医院妇产科,江苏 扬州
关键词: 出生缺陷高龄孕妇产前诊断NT筛查NIPTBirth Defects Advanced Maternal Age Prenatal Diagnosis NT Screening NIPT
摘要: 目的:探讨不同产前诊断诊断指征的高龄孕妇胎儿染色体异常的发生率和各种优生学检查的诊断效能,为出生缺陷防控提供依据。方法:纳入了2019~2024年在苏北人民医院产检并完成随访的高龄孕妇3378例,按指征及年龄分组,以羊水穿刺结果或分娩新生儿结局为金标准,比较异常检出率并评估NIPT的诊断效能。结果:胎儿染色体异常总检出率为5.57% (56/1005),组1检出3例T21 (11.5%)和1例T18 (3.8%);组2检出9例T21 (27.3%)、1例T18 (3.0%)及3例SCA (9.1%);组3检出微缺失/微重复3例(9.7%);组4检出7例T21 (0.77%)、5例SCA (0.55%)、9例平衡易位(0.98%)及14例微缺失/微重复(1.5%)。NIPT对T21、T18及SCA的灵敏度均为100.0%,特异度为97.1%、99.3%和97.2%;染色体异常检出率随年龄增长而升高,不同年龄组间差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 14.935, P < 0.001)。结论:高龄孕妇胎儿染色体异常随年龄增加而升高,单纯高龄预测不足,应结合其他产前诊断指征,NIPT筛查效力较高,必要时仍需行染色体微阵列分析排除拷贝数变异(CNV)。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the incidence of fetal chromosomal abnormalities and the diagnostic performance of various eugenics screening methods in advanced‑age pregnant women with different prenatal diagnostic indications, providing a basis for birth defect prevention and control. Methods: A total of 3378 advanced‑age pregnant women who underwent antenatal care and completed follow‑up at Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital from 2019 to 2024 were included. They were grouped according to indication and age. Using amniocentesis results or neonatal delivery outcomes as the gold standard, abnormal detection rates were compared and the diagnostic efficacy of non‑invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was evaluated. Results: The overall detection rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities was 5.57% (56/1005). Group 1 detected 3 cases of T21 (11.5%) and 1 case of T18 (3.8%); Group 2 detected 9 cases of T21 (27.3%), 1 case of T18 (3.0%), and 3 cases of sex chromosome abnormalities (SCA, 9.1%); Group 3 detected 3 cases of microdeletions/microduplications (9.7%); Group 4 detected 7 cases of T21 (0.77%), 5 cases of SCA (0.55%), 9 cases of balanced translocations (0.98%), and 14 cases of microdeletions/microduplications (1.5%). The sensitivity of NIPT for T21, T18, and SCA was 100.0%, with specificities of 97.1%, 99.3%, and 97.2%, respectively. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities increased with maternal age, showing a statistically significant difference among age groups (χ2 = 14.935, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in advanced‑age pregnant women rises with increasing maternal age. Prediction based on age alone is insufficient and should be combined with other prenatal diagnostic indications. NIPT shows high screening efficacy, but chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) remains necessary when needed to exclude copy number variations (CNV).
文章引用:农丽颜, 朱梦洁, 张素华, 居云, 傅丹. 高龄孕妇产前筛查与产前诊断策略评估[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 4350-4356. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641703

参考文献

[1] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2024) World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results (UN DESA/POP/2024/TR/NO. 9).
[2] Zhou, Y., Yin, S., Sheng, Q., Yang, J., Liu, J., Li, H., et al. (2023) Association of Maternal Age with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in China. Journal of Global Health, 13, Article No. 04161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Yang, Y., Muzny, D.M., Xia, F., Niu, Z., Person, R., Ding, Y., et al. (2014) Molecular Findings among Patients Referred for Clinical Whole-Exome Sequencing. JAMA, 312, 1870-1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Hanson, B., Paternoster, B., Povarnitsyn, N., Scotchman, E., Chitty, L. and Chandler, N. (2023) Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPD): Current and Emerging Technologies. Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids, 4, 3-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Saccone, G., Gragnano, E., Ilardi, B., Marrone, V., Strina, I., Venturella, R., et al. (2022) Maternal and Perinatal Complications According to Maternal Age: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 159, 43-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 中华医学会围产医学分会, 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 高龄妇女孕期管理专家共识[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2024, 27(6): 441-449.
[7] Xiao, H., Yang, Y.L., Zhang, C.Y., Liao, E.J., Zhao, H.R. and Liao, S.X. (2016) Karyotype Analysis with Amniotic Fluid in 12365 Pregnant Women with Indications for Genetic Amniocentesis and Strategies of Prenatal Diagnosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 36, 293-296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ma, J., Hong, P., Fu, J., Yu, L. and Yang, H. (2014) Prenatal Diagnostic Testing among Women Referred for Advanced Maternal Age in Beijing, 2001-2012. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 125, 232-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Liu, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, L., Ma, Y., Gao, Z., You, Y., et al. (2021) The Relationship between Prenatal Diagnosis Indications and Abnormal Chromosomal Karyotypes: A Retrospective Cohort of 4646 Cases in Beijing from 2012-2019. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 21, 1301-1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Cuckle, H. and Maymon, R. (2013) Role of Second‐Trimester Ultrasound in Screening for down Syndrome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 41, 241-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Page, I.J. (1995) Fetal Nuchal Translucency: Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Trisomy in the First Trimester of Pregnancy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 102, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 但春华, 李俊男. 高龄孕妇产前筛查与产前诊断的发展[J]. 中国产前诊断杂志(电子版), 2024, 16(1): 41-45.
[13] Chiu, R.W.K. and Lo, Y.M.D. (2011) Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis by Fetal Nucleic Acid Analysis in Maternal Plasma: The Coming of Age. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 16, 88-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 胡芷洋, 高雅, 郭辉, 等. 无创产前检测筛查胎儿微缺失微重复综合征阳性病例的临床分析[J]. 中国产前诊断杂志(电子版), 2016, 8(1): 14-18.
[15] Wulff, C.B., Gerds, T.A., Rode, L., Ekelund, C.K., Petersen, O.B. and Tabor, A. (2016) Risk of Fetal Loss Associated with Invasive Testing Following Combined First‐Trimester Screening for Down Syndrome: A National Cohort of 147 987 Singleton Pregnancies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 47, 38-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Dakov, T. and Dimitrova, V. (2014) Pregnancy and Delivery in Women above the Age of 35. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia (Sofiia), 53, 13-20.
[17] Fiorentino, F., Napoletano, S., Caiazzo, F., Sessa, M., Bono, S., Spizzichino, L., et al. (2013) Chromosomal Microarray Analysis as a First-Line Test in Pregnancies with a Priori Low Risk for the Detection of Submicroscopic Chromosomal Abnormalities. European Journal of Human Genetics, 21, 725-730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Oyelese, Y., Schioppo, D. and O’Brien, B. (2025) Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis: Time for a Paradigm Shift. American Journal of Perinatology, 42, 538-545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Alberry, M.S., Aziz, E., Ahmed, S.R. and Abdel-fattah, S. (2021) Non Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for Common Aneuploidies and Beyond. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 258, 424-429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]