人工智能生成物著作权保护路径探析
Analysis on the Copyright Protection Path for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Works
摘要: 在人工智能技术迅猛发展、深刻重塑内容创作生态的背景下,人工智能生成物的版权问题已成为法学界与产业界共同关注的焦点。仅围绕人工智能生成物可版权性“是”或“否”的单一论证,难以破解其版权保护中的各类实践难题。因此,需构建“认定–归属–补充–溯源”的全链条、多层次保护路径,将可版权性标准、权利归属、邻接权保护和数据训练规则四大环节有机结合,形成逻辑清晰、体系完备、兼具实践导向的版权保护体系。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology and its profound reshaping of the content creation ecosystem, copyright issues concerning AI-generated content have emerged as a focal point of shared concern for both the legal academia and the industrial community. A simplistic argument centering solely on “yes” or “no” regarding the copyrightability of AI-generated outputs is insufficient to resolve the various practical challenges in their copyright protection. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a full-chain, multi-tiered protection pathway of “identification—attribution—supplementation—traceability”, which organically integrates four key components: copyrightability standards, ownership of rights, neighboring rights protection, and data training rules, so as to form a logically coherent, systematically complete, and practice-oriented copyright protection regime.
文章引用:郑瑞栋. 人工智能生成物著作权保护路径探析[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(4): 215-221. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.144110

参考文献

[1] 万勇, 李亚兰. 论著作权法中作品独创性的判断方法[J]. 学术月刊, 2025, 57(6): 95-106.
[2] 韩晓虎, 李响. 人工智能著作权归属问题亟待厘清[J]. 人民检察, 2025(18): 67-68.
[3] 郑海味, 张伟君. 人工智能生成图片中用户的独创性贡献——以“AI文生图”著作权案判决为例[J]. 中国出版, 2024(12): 52-57.
[4] 陈慧娟, 安胜蓝. AI时代, 对著作权法的前瞻性思考[N]. 光明日报, 2025-09-06(05).
[5] 王京仔. AI浪潮下, 知识产权制度面临建构[N]. 法治周末, 2025-11-27(004).
[6] 张宪. 人工智能生成内容可版权性的认定方法研究[J]. 法学评论, 2025, 43(4): 146-160.
[7] 李谢标. 人工智能生成物版权保护路径探析[J]. 中国出版, 2024(5): 49-55.
[8] 黄玉烨. 人工智能文生图“非作品”属性界定及邻接权保护路径选择[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2026, 44(2): 81-92.
[9] 刘晓春. 生成式人工智能数据训练中的“非作品性使用”及其合法性证成[J]. 法学论坛, 2024, 39(3): 67-78.
[10] 张涛. 人工智能大模型训练的著作权困境及其调适路径[J]. 现代法学, 2025, 47(2): 189-208.