行政处罚决定公开的界限及规制
Boundary and Regulation of the Disclosure of Administrative Punishment Decisions
摘要: 《行政处罚法》修订后新增的“行政处罚决定公开”制度,将原本规定于特殊行业领域的违法行为公示制度抽象化、一般化,上升为行政机关的执法权力之一。这一举措无疑对扩大公众监管范围,增强政府透明度起到了正面作用。但同时,法律条文的概括性和模糊性也可能会导致行政机关滥用自由裁量权,侵犯相对人权益。因此,明确行政处罚决定公开的界限并对其进行规制,是十分重要的。对此,笔者先于理论层面论述规制行政处罚决定公开的理论基础,明确行政处罚决定公开的界限,提出“界限规制理论”;再从实践层面将“界限规制理论”运用于行政机关的执法程序中,以期让行政处罚决定公开制度能够规范化运行。
Abstract: After the revision of the Administrative Punishment Law, the newly added “administrative penalty decision publicity” system abstracts and generalizes the illegal act publicity system originally stipulated in the special industry field, and increases it to one of the law enforcement powers of the administrative organ. This measure has undoubtedly played a positive role in expanding the scope of public supervision and enhancing government transparency. At the same time, however, the generality and ambiguity of the legal provisions may also lead to the abuse of discretion by the administrative organs and the infringement of the rights and interests of the opposite party. Therefore, it is self-evident that it is important to clarify the boundaries of the publicity of administrative penalty decisions and regulate them. In this regard, the author firstly discusses the theoretical basis for regulating the disclosure of administrative penalty decisions at the theoretical level, clarifies the boundaries of the disclosure of administrative penalty decisions, and proposes the “boundary regulation theory”; then applies the “boundary regulation theory” to the law enforcement procedures of administrative organs at the practical level The aim is to standardise the operation of the system of disclosure of administrative penalty decisions.
文章引用:吕欣怡. 行政处罚决定公开的界限及规制[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(4): 172-181. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.154296

参考文献

[1] 章志远. 行政执法三项制度的三重法治意义解读[J]. 中国司法, 2019(2): 54-56.
[2] 马迅. 行政处罚决定公示:挑战与回应[J]. 江淮论坛, 2017(5): 122-128.
[3] 盐野宏. 行政法总论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008: 231.
[4] 陈武略. 论行政处罚决定的公开——《行政处罚法》第四十八条评介[J]. 湖南警察学院学报, 2021, 33(1): 35-44.
[5] 饶龙飞. 行政处罚决定公开的现状、问题与对策——以浙江政务服务网公开“行政处罚结果信息”为分析对象[J]. 井冈山大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 44(6): 120-128.
[6] 韩文娟,张剑平. 论行政处罚决定公开的规则构建——以福建省交通运输综合行政处罚决定公示为视角[J]. 福建技术师范学院学报, 2025, 43(4): 72-81+98.
[7] 彭錞. 再论行政处罚决定公开: 性质、逻辑与方式[J]. 现代法学, 2024, 46(1): 48-63.
[8] 蔡金荣. 行政处罚决定公开的规范结构及展开[J]. 行政法学研究, 2023(3): 17-29.
[9] 熊樟林. 行政处罚决定为何不需要全部公开?——新《行政处罚法》第48条的正当性解释[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 42(6): 97-104.
[10] 郝铁川. 交通违章记录见报: 侵犯个人隐私[J]. 新闻记者, 2000(3): 23-24.
[11] 刘飞宇. 行政信息公开与个人资料保护的衔接——以我国行政公开第一案为视角[J]. 法学, 2005(4): 122-128.
[12] 朱春华. 美国法上的“负面信息披露” [J]. 比较法研究, 2016(3): 157-173.
[13] 卢荣婕. “具有一定社会影响”的行政处罚决定公开之认定[J]. 财经法学, 2022(4): 180-192
[14] 王锡锌. 行政处罚决定的公开及其限度[J]. 中国司法, 2021(8): 68-71.
[15] 熊樟林. 论作为“权力”的行政处罚决定公开[J]. 政治与法律, 2023(2): 141-159.