德雷福斯人工智能批判思想研究
A Study of Dreyfus’s Critical Thought on Artificial Intelligence
摘要: 本文旨在梳理德雷福斯人工智能批判思想的研究历史和现状。德雷福斯基于海德格尔现象学对早期符号主义人工智能观展开了批判，起初被人工智能专家排斥而后接受，促使该领域产生了海德格尔式人工智能转向，深刻地影响和推动了该领域的研究和发展。德雷福斯的批判是成功的，但也有一定的局限。
Abstract: This paper aims to review the research history and current status of Dreyfus’s critique of artificial intelligence. Drawing on Heideggerian phenomenology, Dreyfus critiqued the symbolic AI approach. Initially rejected by AI experts, his critique was later accepted, prompting a Heideggerian turn in the field and profoundly influencing and advancing its research and development. Dreyfus’s critique was successful, yet it also has certain limitations.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
玛格丽特∙博登. 人工智能哲学[M]. 王汉琦, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2006: 11.
|
|
[2]
|
成素梅, 姚艳勤. 哲学与人工智能的交汇——访休伯特∙德雷福斯和斯图亚特∙德雷福斯[J]. 哲学动态, 2013(11): 102-107.
|
|
[3]
|
Papert, S. (1968) The Artificial Intelligence of Hubert L. Dreyfus: A Budget of Fallacies. Project of MAC, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
https://wellcomecollection.org/works/w4ktp96z/items
|
|
[4]
|
Minsky, M. (1982) Why People Think Computers Can’t. AI Magazine, 3, 3-15.
|
|
[5]
|
蔚蓝, 孙小淳. “一堆谬误”——人工智能专家对德雷福斯的批判[J]. 科学文化评论, 2023, 20(1): 100-114.
|
|
[6]
|
Dreyfus, H. andWrathall, M. (2002) Heidegger Reexamined: Vol. 3. Art, Poetry, and Technology. Routledge, 164 p.
|
|
[7]
|
江怡. 重新审视分析哲学与欧陆哲学的分野[J]. 哲学动态, 2018(1): 64-69．
|
|
[8]
|
段似膺. 海德格尔式人工智能及其对“意识”问题的反思——兼与何怀宏先生商榷[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2019(3): 24-26.
|
|
[9]
|
朱清华. 德雷福斯与海德格尔式人工智能[J]. 哲学动态, 2020(10): 72-79, 128.
|
|
[10]
|
徐英瑾. 译者前言: 英美心灵哲学到底在何处异于欧陆现象学? [M]//塞尔J. 心灵导论. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2008: 12.
|
|
[11]
|
李日容. 海德格尔的时间性此在与人工智能发展的自主性难题——兼论德雷福斯人工智能批判的局限性[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 51(0): 46-56.
|