从增权到行动:遗产地居民地方感、生计资本的作用
From Empowerment to Action: The Role of Sense of Place and Livelihood Capital among Heritage Site Residents
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.154299, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 荆 尧:佛山大学环境与化工学院位,广东 佛山;张玉玲*:佛山大学管理学院,广东 佛山;温美丽:广东省科学院广州地理研究所,广东 广州
关键词: 社区增权遗产地责任行为地方感生计资本Community Empowerment Responsible Behavior in Heritage Sites Sense of Place Livelihood Capital
摘要: 社区参与是遗产地可持续治理的核心,然而“增权–行动”链条的断裂成为现实困境,揭示增权有效激发居民遗产地责任行为路径具有重要意义。研究以世界灌溉工程遗产佛山桑园围为案例地,基于层次回归分析法与模糊集定性比较分析方法对296份有效问卷进行分析,探讨生计资本、地方感共同作用下社区增权对居民遗产地责任行为的影响机理。结果表明:(1) 社区增权对居民遗产地责任行为有显著直接影响,除社会与民主管理增权负向影响生态与遗产地保护行为其它均为正向影响;(2) 地方感在社区增权和遗产地责任行为之间具有显著中介效应;(3) 生计资本对社区增权和地方感之间关系无显著调节作用;(4) 经济与心理增权是两类责任行为的共同基础,地方感对两类责任行为均有重要驱动作用,多数路径依赖两个及以上核心条件的组合方实现高水平遗产地责任行为。研究不仅在理论上丰富了社区增权与居民行为关系的机制认知,亦在方法上综合了定量与组态研究,以期为遗产地治理提供筑牢“增权–行动”链条理论依据与实践启示。
Abstract: Community participation is pivotal to the sustainable governance of heritage sites. However, the frequent disconnection within the empowerment-action chain presents a significant practical dilemma. Consequently, elucidating the pathways through which empowerment effectively stimulates residents’ responsible behavior in heritage sites is of great theoretical and practical importance. Taking Sangyuanwei in Foshan, a World Heritage Irrigation Structure, as the case study, this research analyzes 296 valid questionnaires to explore the complex mechanisms linking community empowerment to residents’ responsible behavior. The study adopts a mixed-method approach, integrating Hierarchical Regression Analysis and Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to examine the joint effects of livelihood capital and sense of place. The empirical results indicate that community empowerment exerts a significant direct influence on responsible behavior. Specifically, while most dimensions of empowerment have a positive impact, social and democratic management empowerment were found to negatively affect ecological and heritage protection behaviors. Furthermore, sense of place plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between community empowerment and responsible behavior, whereas livelihood capital does not show a significant moderating effect on the relationship between community empowerment and sense of place. The results from the qualitative comparative analysis reveal that economic and psychological empowerment serve as the common foundation for different types of responsible behaviors, with sense of place acting as a critical driver. Moreover, achieving high levels of responsible behavior is not dependent on a single factor but relies on configurational paths involving combinations of two or more core conditions. Theoretically, this study enriches the understanding of the mechanism between community empowerment and resident behavior. Methodologically, it demonstrates the value of combining quantitative regression with configurational analysis. Ultimately, these findings provide a solid theoretical basis and practical implications for heritage site managers to strengthen the empowerment-action chain and foster sustainable heritage governance.
文章引用:荆尧, 张玉玲, 温美丽. 从增权到行动:遗产地居民地方感、生计资本的作用[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(4): 199-213. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.154299

参考文献

[1] Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Pereira Roders, A. and van Wesemael, P. (2020) Community Participation in Cultural Heritage Management: A Systematic Literature Review Comparing Chinese and International Practices. Cities, 96, Article ID: 102476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Ryan, C., Chaozhi, Z. and Zeng, D. (2011) The Impacts of Tourism at a UNESCO Heritage Site in China—A Need for a Meta-Narrative? The Case of the Kaiping Diaolou. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19, 747-765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Nurkomala, N., Diswandi, D. and Fadliyanti, L. (2023) The Role of Community Empowerment Institutions for Village Development. European Journal of Development Studies, 3, 76-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Dushkova, D. and Ivlieva, O. (2024) Empowering Communities to Act for a Change: A Review of the Community Empowerment Programs Towards Sustainability and Resilience. Sustainability, 16, Article 8700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Zimmerman, M.A. (1990) Taking Aim on Empowerment Research: On the Distinction between Individual and Psychological Conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 169-177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 王成超. 农户生计行为变迁的生态效应——基于社区增权理论的案例研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(18): 315-319.
[7] Scheyvens, R. (1999) Ecotourism and the Empowerment of Local Communities. Tourism Management, 20, 245-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Vadrucci, M. (2025) Sustainable Cultural Heritage Conservation: A Challenge and an Opportunity for the Future. Sustainability, 17, Article 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 陈新新, 李伯华, 窦银娣, 等. 社区增权视角下文化遗产地治理路径优化——以惹巴拉村寨为例[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(1): 100-112.
[10] 贾丽. 国外非物质文化遗产研究的脉络与走向[J]. 原生态民族文化学刊, 2024, 16(6): 112-124, 155-156.
[11] 周嘉宜, 杨辰. 行动者视角下的遗产社区识别与形成机制分析[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2024, 68(6): 113-120.
[12] 文彤, 雍玉凤, 张庆芳. 态度、行为、责任: 乡村旅游从业者影响感知研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2018, 34(3): 418-421, 444.
[13] He, J. and Mohamad, D.B. (2025) The Impact of Empowerment on Residents’ Willingness to Participate: The Mediating Effects of Place Attachment and Residents’ Support. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20, 1443-1456.
[14] Tsoriyo, W. (2024) Place Attachment and Participation in Community-Driven Development in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Town and Regional Planning, 84, 1-14.
[15] Bodagh Abadi, E. and Aminzadeh, B. (2025) Exploring the Relationships between Empowerment and Place Attachment: A Systematic Review of Key Factors. Urban Planning Knowledge, 9, 1-29.
[16] Tanaka, K., Davidson, L. and Craig, T.J. (2018) Sense of Clubhouse Community Belonging and Empowerment. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 64, 276-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Chen, H., Lin, T. and Chen, Y. (2025) The Impact of Social Capital and Community Empowerment on Regional Revitalization Practices: A Case Study on the Practice of University Social Responsibility Programs in Wanli and Jinshan Districts. Sustainability, 17, Article 4653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Moreira dos Santos, E.R., Pereira, L.N., Pinto, P. and Boley, B.B. (2024) Development and Validation of the New Resident Empowerment through Tourism Scale: RETS 2.0. Tourism Management, 104, Article ID: 104915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Strzelecka, M., Boley, B.B. and Woosnam, K.M. (2017) Place Attachment and Empowerment: Do Residents Need to Be Attached to Be Empowered? Annals of Tourism Research, 66, 61-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 王永桂, 赵士德. 文化自信与文化归属对文化保护行为的影响机制——基于徽州文化生态保护区居民的调查[J]. 西安石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 28(3): 39-46.
[21] Gursoy, D., Zhang, C. and Chi, O.H. (2019) Determinants of Locals’ Heritage Resource Protection and Conservation Responsibility Behaviors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31, 2339-2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 孙玉涛. 休闲涉入、地方依恋与文化保护意向研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2019.
[23] Ramkissoon, H., Weiler, B. and Smith, L.D.G. (2012) Place Attachment and Pro-Environmental Behaviour in National Parks: The Development of a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20, 257-276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Xie, X. and Wang, Z. (2024) The Impact of Place Attachment on the Environmentally Responsible Behavior of Residents in National Park Gateway Communities and the Mediating Effect of Environmental Commitment: A Case of China National Park. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1386337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] 史恒通, 任爽妮, 樊辉, 等. 生计资本对秦岭国家公园创建区原住居民亲环境行为的影响——基于公平感知视角分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(10): 2335-2349.
[26] Ma, L., Zhang, Y., Li, T., Zhao, S. and Yi, J. (2024) Livelihood Capitals and Livelihood Resilience: Understanding the Linkages in China’s Government-Led Poverty Alleviation Resettlement. Habitat International, 147, Article ID: 103057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 卢志强, 曹广忠, 李贵才. 农户生计资本特征及对生活满意度的影响——基于中国13省25县抽样调查数据的分析[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 57(3): 556-564.
[28] 赵雪雁. 生计资本对农牧民生活满意度的影响——以甘南高原为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(4): 687-698.
[29] Ojiaku, O.C., Achi, B.E. and Aghara, V.O. (2018) Cognitive-Affective Predictors of Green Purchase Intentions among Health Workers in Nigeria. Management Science Letters, 8, 1027-1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] 曹李梅, 曲颖. 热带海岛型目的地情境下旅游者地方依恋: 心理归因及其形成机理[J]. 人文地理, 2019, 34(5): 135-141, 158.
[31] Fishbein, M. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 335-381.
[32] Williams, D.R., Patterson, M.E., Roggenbuck, J.W. and Watson, A.E. (1992) Beyond the Commodity Metaphor: Examining Emotional and Symbolic Attachment to Place. Leisure Sciences, 14, 29-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] 林元城, 杨忍, 赖秋萍, 等. 地方感的塑造与乡村治理: 潮汕宗祠案例[J]. 热带地理, 2020, 40(4): 732-743.
[34] 黎耀奇, 王雄志, 陈朋. 基于游客与居民视角的遗产地遗产责任量表开发与检验[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(10): 60-75.
[35] DFID (1999) Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Department for International Development, 75-83.
[36] 曲朦, 赵凯. 农户生计资本对其耕地保护行为的影响——基于河南滑县的473个农户样本[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2018, 39(5): 808-816.
[37] 苏芳, 蒲欣冬, 徐中民, 等. 生计资本与生计策略关系研究——以张掖市甘州区为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 19(6): 119-125.
[38] 李敏, 周颖霞, 杜鹏程. 平台型领导如何提升团队创新绩效——基于SEM与fsQCA的链式中介分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(5): 129-139.
[39] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰. 有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量[J]. 心理学报, 2006(3): 448-452.
[40] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 155-167.
[41] 方航. 旅游形象遮蔽、地方依恋和遗产责任行为的关系研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2022.
[42] 巨英英, 程励. 文化遗产地旅游社区居民遗产责任行为的形成机制——基于模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(5): 1135-1149.
[43] 杨继荣, 张朝枝. 研学旅游的知识与社区居民的地方认同重构——以广东丹霞山自然保护地为例[J]. 热带地理, 2024, 44(3): 393-402.