基于深度学习的漂浮水稻种植区水质参数预测
Prediction of Water Quality Parameters in Floating Rice Cultivation Areas Based on Deep Learning
DOI: 10.12677/aep.2026.164055, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈晓辉:淮南矿业(集团)有限责任公司,安徽 淮南;深部煤炭安全开采与环境保护全国重点实验室,安徽 淮南;孙宏杰, 陈 晨, 陈虹雨:深部煤炭安全开采与环境保护全国重点实验室,安徽 淮南;煤矿生态环境保护国家工程实验室,安徽 淮南;平安煤炭开采工程技术研究院有限责任公司,安徽 淮南;云 宇, 李小龙, 陈永胜, 黄智慧:安徽理工大学地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南;张世文:深部煤炭安全开采与环境保护全国重点实验室,安徽 淮南;安徽理工大学地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南
关键词: 深度学习漂浮水稻门控循环单元生态修复水环境监测Deep Learning Floating Rice Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) Ecological Restoration Water Environment Monitoring
摘要: 目的:采煤沉陷区是当前生态修复与治理的典型难题,沉陷区环境承载力脆弱,极易受到污染。为探究“漂浮水稻”种植对采煤沉陷积水区的影响,同时提升对采煤沉陷积水区的监测能力,研究以淮南市顾桥矿采煤沉陷积水区“漂浮水稻”种植试验区为研究对象,对种植了“漂浮水稻”的被修复水域进行水质监测和分析,为采煤沉陷积水区水体的监测提供技术支持。方法:研究通过收集水体的总磷、总氮、氨氮和叶绿素a等指标,分析并评价了种植区水域的水质情况,同时构建了门控循环单元(GRU)模型。通过优化模型的特征选择和参数调整,提升预测精度和泛化能力,实现对采煤沉陷积水区水体指标的时间序列预测。结果:研究表明,利用“漂浮水稻”能一定程度上净化采煤沉陷积水区水体,遏制水体富营养化。研究结果显示,GRU模型对叶绿素a的预测效果最优,决定系数R2为0.89,与对总磷、总氮和氨氮的预测相比,GRU模型对叶绿素a的预测具备更高的可信度。结论:研究成功构建了对采煤沉陷积水区水体指标的时间序列预测模型,为采煤沉陷积水区水环境监测提供了技术支持。
Abstract: Objective: Coal mining subsidence areas are typical challenges in current ecological restoration and management. The environmental carrying capacity of subsidence areas is fragile and highly susceptible to pollution. To explore the impact of “floating rice” cultivation on waterlogged areas in coal mining subsidence zones, and to enhance the monitoring capability of such areas, this study focused on the floating rice cultivation experimental zone in the Guqiao Mine waterlogged area of Huainan City. Water quality monitoring and analysis were conducted in the restored waters where “floating rice” was planted, providing technical support for the monitoring of water bodies in coal mining subsidence areas. Methods: The study collected indicators such as total phosphorus, total nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, and chlorophyll a to analyse and evaluate the water quality of the cultivation area. In addition, a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) model was constructed. By optimising feature selection and adjusting parameters, the model’s prediction accuracy and generalisation capability were enhanced, enabling time-series prediction of water indicators in coal mining subsidence waterlogged areas. Results: The study indicated that the use of “floating rice” can purify water in coal mining subsidence areas to a certain extent and curb eutrophication. The results showed that the GRU model had the best predictive performance for chlorophyll a with a coefficient of determination R2 of 0.89. Compared with the predictions for total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and ammonia nitrogen, the GRU model provided higher reliability for chlorophyll a prediction. Conclusion: The study successfully established a time-series prediction model for water indicators in coal mining subsidence waterlogged areas, offering technical support for water environment monitoring in such zones.
文章引用:陈晓辉, 孙宏杰, 陈晨, 云宇, 李小龙, 张世文, 陈虹雨, 陈永胜, 黄智慧. 基于深度学习的漂浮水稻种植区水质参数预测[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2026, 16(4): 556-567. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2026.164055

参考文献

[1] 孟庄涵, 王玉涛, 田延哲. 采煤沉陷区治理修复与开发利用关键技术进展[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2025, 53(7): 227-252.
[2] 胡林, 陈永春, 徐燕飞, 等. 高潜水位采煤沉陷区水质评价与污染因子识别[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2023, 51(11): 83-91.
[3] 郎建, 李小龙, 张世文, 等. 基于机器学习的采煤沉陷区水体富营养化监测[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 44(6): 99-108.
[4] 王彩玲, 王一鸣. 基于高光谱与改进BP神经网络的水体生化需氧量(BOD)估算[J]. 中国无机分析化学, 2023, 13(9): 986-992.
[5] 许钦, 金晨, 张坤, 等. 耦合深度学习与水文模型的喀斯特地区径流模拟方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2025, 36(4): 634-645.
[6] Li, X., Yang, B., Yang, J., Fan, Y., Qian, X. and Li, H. (2021) Magnetic Properties and Its Application in the Prediction of Potentially Toxic Elements in Aquatic Products by Machine Learning. Science of the Total Environment, 783, Article ID: 147083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Mei, P., Li, M., Zhang, Q., Li, G. and Song, L. (2022) Prediction Model of Drinking Water Source Quality with Potential Industrial-Agricultural Pollution Based on CNN-GRU-Attention. Journal of Hydrology, 610, Article ID: 127934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Gao, S., Huang, Y., Zhang, S., Han, J., Wang, G., Zhang, M., et al. (2020) Short-Term Runoff Prediction with GRU and LSTM Networks without Requiring Time Step Optimization during Sample Generation. Journal of Hydrology, 589, Article ID: 125188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Gharehbaghi, A., Ghasemlounia, R., Ahmadi, F. and Albaji, M. (2022) Groundwater Level Prediction with Meteorologically Sensitive Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) Neural Networks. Journal of Hydrology, 612, Article ID: 128262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zhang, J., Chen, X., Khan, A., Zhang, Y., Kuang, X., Liang, X., et al. (2021) Daily Runoff Forecasting by Deep Recursive Neural Network. Journal of Hydrology, 596, Article ID: 126067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. HJ 495-2009 水质 采样方案设计技术规定[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2009.
[12] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. HJ 636-2012 水质 总氮的测定 碱性过硫酸钾消解紫外分光光度法[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2012.
[13] 中华人民共和国国家标准. GB 11893-89 水质 总磷的测定 钼酸铵分光光度法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1989.
[14] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. HJ 897-2017 水质 叶绿素a 的测定 分光光度法[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2017.
[15] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. HJ 535-2009 水质 氨氮的测定 纳氏试剂分光光度法[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2009.
[16] 李小龙, 陈永胜, 张世文, 等. 水样储存时间对“漂浮水稻”种植区水质检测影响[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 44(6): 56-63.
[17] 黄美琴. 基于Sentinel-2影像的采煤沉陷积水区水面光伏特征提取与水质参数反演[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽理工大学, 2024.
[18] 范廷玉, 张金棚, 王顺, 等. 封闭式采煤沉陷积水区富营养化评价方法比较[J]. 安徽理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(3): 8-15.
[19] 李苏, 闫志宏, 徐丹, 等. 改进的内梅罗指数法在水库水质评价中的应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(31): 13079-13084.
[20] Li, X., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Fan, Y., Qian, X. and Li, H. (2021) Rapid Diagnosis of Heavy Metal Pollution in Lake Sediments Based on Environmental Magnetism and Machine Learning. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 416, Article ID: 126163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Li, X., Yang, J., Fan, Y., Xie, M., Qian, X. and Li, H. (2021) Rapid Monitoring of Heavy Metal Pollution in Lake Water Using Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrients and Physicochemical Indicators by Support Vector Machine. Chemosphere, 280, Article ID: 130599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Yoon, S. and Ahn, K. (2025) Improved Prediction of Chlorophyll-a Concentrations Using Advancing Graph Neural Network Variants. Science of the Total Environment, 979, Article ID: 179481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Abbaspour, K.C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., Siber, R., Bogner, K., Mieleitner, J., et al. (2007) Modelling Hydrology and Water Quality in the Pre-Alpine/Alpine Thur Watershed Using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333, 413-430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Abbas, A., Park, M., Baek, S. and Cho, K.H. (2023) Deep Learning-Based Algorithms for Long-Term Prediction of Chlorophyll-a in Catchment Streams. Journal of Hydrology, 626, Article ID: 130240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Atique, U. and An, K. (2020) Landscape Heterogeneity Impacts Water Chemistry, Nutrient Regime, Organic Matter and Chlorophyll Dynamics in Agricultural Reservoirs. Ecological Indicators, 110, Article ID: 105813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Guyu, Z., Xiaoyuan, Y., Jiansen, S., Hongdou, H. and Qian, W. (2025) A PM2.5 Spatiotemporal Prediction Model Based on Mixed Graph Convolutional GRU and Self-Attention Network. Environmental Pollution, 368, Article ID: 125748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Wu, X., Gu, X. and See, K.W. (2024) ADNNet: Attention-Based Deep Neural Network for Air Quality Index Prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 258, Article ID: 125128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Souquet, L., Shvai, N., Llanza, A. and Nakib, A. (2023) Convolutional Neural Network Architecture Search Based on Fractal Decomposition Optimization Algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, Article ID: 118947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Chen, J., Lu, J., Avise, J.C., DaMassa, J.A., Kleeman, M.J. and Kaduwela, A.P. (2014) Seasonal Modeling of PM2.5 in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Atmospheric Environment, 92, 182-190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Khosravi, A., Koury, R.N.N., Machado, L. and Pabon, J.J.G. (2018) Prediction of Wind Speed and Wind Direction Using Artificial Neural Network, Support Vector Regression and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 25, 146-160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 张伟, 刘阳, 陈欣. 基于机器学习模型预测淡水湖泊的富营养化[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 30(8): 915-923.