基于U-G-S共同体推进CTI模式的路径与机制研究
Research on the Pathways and Mechanisms for Advancing the CTI Model Based on the U-G-S Community
摘要: 指向核心素养发展的“建构–迁移–创新”(CTI)教学模式在中小学常态化推广中,面临专业支持不足、实施动力匮乏与协同机制缺失等多重挑战,其根源在于大学、政府与学校(U-G-S)三方未能形成协同赋能生态。研究立足U-G-S共同体理念,系统论证了以数字化共同体支撑CTI模式深度实施的可行路径。研究表明,CTI模式推进之困本质是共同体缺失,需构建以治理协同、知识创生流动、利益平衡驱动为核心动力的赋能系统。通过理念共识、平台共建、教学共治、成果共享四位一体路径,可推动教学改革从理念移植迈向生态重构,并为权责平衡、制度适配与评价优化等深层问题提供反思框架。
Abstract: The widespread implementation of the “Construction-Transfer-Innovation” (CTI) instructional model, aimed at fostering core competencies in primary and secondary schools, confronts multifaceted challenges including insufficient professional support, deficient implementation motivation, and the absence of collaborative mechanisms. These challenges fundamentally stem from the failure of the university-government-school (U-G-S) triad to form a synergistic empowerment ecosystem. Grounded in the U-G-S community concept, this study systematically demonstrates the viable pathway of leveraging a digital community to support the deep implementation of the CTI model. The research indicates that the difficulties in promoting the CTI model are essentially attributable to the absence of a community, necessitating the construction of an empowerment system driven by governance synergy, knowledge creation and flow, and interest balancing. Through an integrated four-pronged approach—embracing conceptual consensus, platform co-construction, teaching co-governance, and outcome sharing—it is possible to propel instructional reform from mere conceptual transplantation toward ecological reconstruction, thereby providing a reflective framework for addressing deeper issues such as balanced rights and responsibilities, institutional adaptation, and evaluation optimization.
文章引用:农森安, 尹闯, 崔凤蝶, 刘婷婷. 基于U-G-S共同体推进CTI模式的路径与机制研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(4): 123-130. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.144253

参考文献

[1] 喻平. 发展学生数学核心素养的一个教学模式建构[J]. 数学通报, 2023(9): 1-6, 11.
[2] 谢文静, 彭坚. “以学生为主体”教学模式影响因素的分析[J]. 高教探索, 2006(4): 65-66.
[3] 谢桂新. 基于扎根理论的教师教育U-G-S培养模式研究[J]. 高教探索, 2021(12): 47-52.
[4] 刘益春, 李广, 高夯等. “U-G-S”教师教育模式建构研究——基于教师教育创新东北实验区建设的实践与思考[J]. 教师教育研究, 2013, 25(1): 61-64, 54.
[5] 闫建章, 郭赟嘉等. 师范院校“大学-政府-学校”人才培养模式研究——基于山西师范大学的实践探索[J]. 中国高教研究, 2013(8): 75-78.
[6] 蔡华健, 张相学, 曹慧英. 教师教育U-G-S合作的实施困境与路径突破——基于利益相关者理论的分析[J]. 上海教育科研, 2021(10): 80-85.
[7] 李广. 教师教育协同创新机制研究——东北师范大学“U-G-S”教师教育模式新发展[J]. 教育研究, 2017, 38(4): 146-151.
[8] 张军, 朱旭东. 重构科学教师教育体系[J]. 教育研究, 2023, 44(6): 27-35.
[9] 喻平. 知识理解到素养发展的教学实践理路[J]. 教学与管理, 2024(10): 1-6.
[10] 子华明, 庭奇, 王双宏. “强师计划”背景下民族地区乡村小学全科教师“U-G-S”协同培养模式探索[J]. 中国民族教育, 2023(9): 40-43.
[11] Liu, S., Wang, Y. and Yin, H. (2025) A Meta-Analysis of the Correlation between Professional Learning Communities and Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs. Educational Research Review, 46, Article ID: 100660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 喻平, 胡晋宾. CTI模式: 知识迁移应用的教学策略[J]. 数学通报, 2023, 62(11): 1-6, 28.
[13] 喻平, 谢圣英. CTI模式: 知识创新应用的教学策略[J]. 数学通报, 2023, 62(12): 1-5, 18.
[14] 罗曼. 复杂性理论视域下U-G-S教师教育共同体的构建——基于教师教育创新实验区建设的实践与思考[J]. 高教学刊, 2020(12): 21-24.
[15] 李高建, 于洪洋, 刘瑞. 新时代地方高校师范类专业U-G-S-S协同育人的现实需求、困境与机制构建[J]. 现代职业教育, 2024(15): 13-16.