基于马克思异化劳动理论的数字劳动异化批判
A Critique of Digital Labor Alienation Based on Marx’s Theory of Alienated Labor
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2026.154188, PDF,   
作者: 白文慧:暨南大学马克思主义学院,广东 广州
关键词: 马克思异化劳动数字劳动数字资本主义Marx Alienated Labor Digital Labor Digital Capitalism
摘要: 马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中提出的异化劳动理论为剖析资本主义生产关系下人的发展困境提供了理论基础。随着数字技术革命的深化,数字劳动作为新型劳动形态并未消除异化问题,反而通过数据垄断、算法控制等新形式加剧了资本对劳动的剥削。基于马克思异化劳动理论的四重维度,系统剖析底层数字零工劳动者、数字技术脑力劳动者、数字创业创意者的异化现象;揭示其背后资本逻辑主导、数字技术异化加深剥削及意识形态与消费文化共谋的深层成因;提出回归数字技术的价值本位、提升数字劳动者的数字技能与主体意识、完善数字劳动法规体系以及消解数字拜物教的观念认知等治理路径。
Abstract: The theory of alienated labor proposed by Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 provides a theoretical foundation for analyzing the predicament of human development under capitalist relations of production. With the deepening of the digital technology revolution, digital labor, as a new form of labor, has not eliminated the problem of alienation. On the contrary, it has intensified the exploitation of labor by capital through new forms such as data monopoly and algorithmic control. Based on the four dimensions of Marx’s theory of alienated labor, this paper systematically analyzes the alienation phenomena experienced by different groups: grassroots digital gig workers, digital technology intellectual workers and digital entrepreneurs/creatives. It reveals the underlying causes, including the dominance of capitalist logic, the deepening exploitation facilitated by the alienation of digital technology itself, and the collusion between ideology and consumer culture. Accordingly, the paper proposes several governance pathways. These include returning digital technology to its value-oriented essence, enhancing the digital skills and subjective consciousness of digital laborers, improving the legal and regulatory system for digital labor, and deconstructing the perceptual cognition associated with digital fetishism.
文章引用:白文慧. 基于马克思异化劳动理论的数字劳动异化批判[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(4): 464-470. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.154188

参考文献

[1] 苏鹏. 数字劳动异化的内涵、形态与超越[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2025(5): 76-85.
[2] 封海波. 迈向“数据治理”: 数据确权方案的本土争论与理论调和[J]. 法理——法哲学、法学方法论与人工智能, 2024(2): 180-199+371-372.
[3] 韩文龙. 平台经济全球化的资本逻辑及其批判与超越[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2021(6): 134-145.
[4] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 41, 44, 56.
[5] 罗克全, 隋昌鹏. 数字社会主义与数字资本主义的比较研究[J]. 人文杂志, 2025(8): 37-47.
[6] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 159, 550.
[7] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集(第三卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2002: 269.
[8] 马克思. 资本论(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2004: 269.
[9] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯全集(第十二卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1962: 4.
[10] 高惠珠, 赵建芬. 论马克思理论中的自由时间与休闲——劳动理论研究的另一维度[J]. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 40(2): 154-160.
[11] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第四卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012: 930.
[12] 李小芬, 吴国林. 从“机器换人”到“人机共舞”: 人工智能时代劳动主体的解构与重构[J]. 理论月刊, 2025(3): 5-14+159.
[13] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 32.