黄龙洞拟建水库坝址岩体渗透性分析与渗漏风险初判
Rock Mass Permeability Analysis and Preliminary Assessment of Leakage Risk at the Dam Site of the Proposed Huanglongdong Reservoir
摘要: 为评价拟建黄龙洞水库坝址的渗漏风险与工程适宜性,本研究综合采用实地考察、高密度电法物探及钻探(ZK1, ZK2)等手段,对坝址区进行了立体化勘察。本次物探沿坝轴线(测线一)及垂直坝轴线方向(测线二)布设,结合压水试验重点分析了坝址区岩溶发育特征与岩体渗透性。结果表明:坝轴线剖面电性结构横向分异显著,左岸坝肩存在明显的低阻异常区,提示构造破碎或强岩溶发育;而河床及右岸坝肩主要表现为中高阻特征,岩体相对完整。钻孔压水试验进一步揭示岩体渗透性具强烈垂向分带规律,浅部强风化带透水率极高(最大118.6 Lu),44.8 m深度以下进入完整基岩带(<3 Lu)。综合判定:坝址区存在“左岸构造控溶渗漏、右岸浅表弥散渗漏”的风险特征。结论认为,坝址具备工程建设的“有条件适宜性”,建议防渗设计应以左岸深层防渗与右岸浅部帷幕灌浆相结合。
Abstract: To evaluate the leakage risk and engineering suitability of the proposed Huanglongdong Reservoir dam site, this study employed a multi-faceted investigation approach integrating field surveys, the high-density resistivity method, and drilling (ZK1, ZK2). Geophysical exploration was conducted along the dam axis (Line 1) and perpendicular to it (Line 2), with a focus on analyzing the karst development characteristics and rock mass permeability at the dam site through packer tests. The results indicate significant lateral heterogeneity in the electrical structure of the dam axis, with a pronounced low-resistivity anomaly zone in the left abutment, suggesting tectonic fragmentation or strong karst development. In contrast, the riverbed and right abutment exhibit predominantly medium-to-high resistivity, indicating relatively intact rock mass. Borehole packer tests further reveal a strong vertical zonation in permeability, with the shallow, highly weathered zone displaying extremely high permeability (up to 118.6 Lu), while the intact bedrock below 44.8 m depth shows low permeability (<3 Lu). Comprehensive analysis identifies the leakage risk characteristics at the dam site as “structural-controlled leakage on the left bank and shallow diffuse leakage on the right bank”. It is concluded that the dam site demonstrates “conditional suitability” for construction, and it is recommended that anti-seepage measures integrate deep curtain grouting on the left bank with shallow curtain grouting on the right bank.
文章引用:张卓彬. 黄龙洞拟建水库坝址岩体渗透性分析与渗漏风险初判[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(4): 326-337. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.154106

参考文献

[1] 李云, 虞磊. 平寨水库左岸岩溶渗漏综合诊断与治理[J]. 水利建设与管理, 2025, 45(11): 54-60.
[2] 马蓝建, 陈世万, 蔡良钧, 等. 岩溶区尾矿库渗漏通道探查及其三维可视化——以贵阳市扎塘赤泥库为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2025, 44(6): 1270-1290.
[3] 曾荣福, 郑克勋, 王钦权. 岩溶水库渗透破坏型渗漏勘察与评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 2023, 42(1): 119-127.
[4] 陈启军, 陈海新, 张浩然, 等. 高卡水库坝址岩溶渗漏分析[J]. 人民珠江, 2014, 35(6): 95-98.
[5] 张迪, 孙峰, 叶晓剑, 等. 基坑地墙渗漏指标预测及风险等级评价方法[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2025, 42(1): 20-26.
[6] 刘志雄. 安徽省贡溪水库岩溶渗漏研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2024.
[7] 梁纯皓. 吉林省花岗岩地区某水库工程钻探与物探手段相结合勘察应用[J]. 中国水运(下半月), 2018, 18(24): 195-196.
[8] 刘晓东, 张虎生, 黄笑春, 等. 高密度电法在宜春市岩溶地质调查中的应用[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2002(1): 74-77.
[9] 代志宏, 朱银红, 卢鹏, 等. 非典型隐伏岩溶发育特征及渗漏研究——以大雪山水库为例[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2021, 41(3): 518-524.
[10] 皮雷, 谭磊, 李波. 综合物探方法在水库绕坝渗漏隐患探测中的应用[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2022(5): 82-86.
[11] 葛文军, 李小超, 赵善国. 五道库水电站坝址右岸断裂带渗漏地质问题研究[J]. 黑龙江水利科技, 2013, 41(5): 128-129.
[12] 孙蓉琳, 梁杏, 靳孟贵. 裂隙岩体渗透系数确定方法综述[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2006(6): 120-123.
[13] 曾晓波. 缅甸滚弄水电站坝址区水文地质条件及坝基渗漏问题处理研究[J]. 水电站设计, 2017, 33(4): 53-56.
[14] 邹成杰. 水库坝址岩溶渗漏类型及防渗帷幕布置型式的研讨[J]. 中国岩溶, 1987(2): 60-67.
[15] 张丽艳. 水库坝址区工程地质条件分析与坝址优选[J]. 吉林水利, 2017(3): 31-33.
[16] 刘强. 松峪水库上坝址坝基渗漏及渗透稳定性工程地质分析评价[J]. 山西水利科技, 2016(2): 20-22.