面向决策的区域微电网定量评估框架
A Quantitative Evaluation Framework for Regional Microgrids Aimed at Decision-Making
摘要: 针对区域微电网研究中“运行优化结果难以直接转化为规划和政策判断依据”的问题,本文提出一种面向决策的定量评估框架。该框架将系统输入、运行决策机制与绩效评估层进行解耦,并通过统一的信息流将短期运行行为映射到年度成本、燃料消耗和二氧化碳排放等长期指标。为说明框架的工程可操作性,文中选取由三台柴油发电机构成的区域微电网作为案例,在相同负荷条件下比较“基准调度场景”和“按成本优先的决策导向场景”。同时补充了一个可复现实算例:基于公开可计算的机组参数、年度负荷持续曲线、柴油价格和排放系数,逐项给出计算方法与结果。结果表明,在本文设定条件下,决策导向场景相较基准场景可使年度燃料消耗、运行成本和二氧化碳排放分别下降约3.55%、3.55%和3.55%。研究表明,即便采用简单透明的运行规则,只要置于统一的长期评估框架中,也能够为区域微电网规划、运行和政策比较提供有解释性的定量依据。
Abstract: This paper proposes a decision-oriented quantitative evaluation framework for regional microgrids, aiming to bridge the gap between short-term operational decisions and long-term planning-oriented performance assessment. The framework decouples system inputs, operational decision mechanisms, and performance evaluation layers, and maps operational behaviors into annualized indicators including cost, fuel consumption, and CO2 emissions. A three-generator diesel microgrid is used to demonstrate the framework under two scenarios: a baseline dispatch rule and a cost-priority decision-oriented rule. To enhance reproducibility, a verifiable numerical example is added based on explicit generator parameters, an annual load-duration curve, diesel price, and an emission factor. Under the adopted assumptions, the decision-oriented scenario reduces annual fuel use, operating cost, and CO2 emissions by about 3.55%, 3.55%, and 3.55%, respectively, compared with the baseline scenario. The study shows that even simple and interpretable operational rules can provide meaningful evidence for planning and policy decisions when embedded in a unified long-term evaluation framework.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Lasseter, R.H. (2011) Smart Distribution: Coupled Microgrids. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99, 1074-1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Hatziargyriou, N. (2014) Microgrids: Architectures and Control. Wiley.
|
|
[3]
|
Olivares, D.E., Mehrizi-Sani, A., Etemadi, A.H., Canizares, C.A., Iravani, R., Kazerani, M., et al. (2014) Trends in Microgrid Control. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5, 1905-1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
Parhizi, S., Lotfi, H., Khodaei, A. and Bahramirad, S. (2015) State of the Art in Research on Microgrids: A Review. IEEE Access, 3, 890-925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
Mancarella, P. (2014) MES (Multi-Energy Systems): An Overview of Concepts and Evaluation Models. Energy, 65, 1-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Keirstead, J., Jennings, M. and Sivakumar, A. (2012) A Review of Urban Energy System Models: Approaches, Challenges and Opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3847-3866.
|
|
[7]
|
Lund, H., Østergaard, P.A., Connolly, D. and Mathiesen, B.V. (2017) Smart Energy and Smart Energy Systems. Energy, 137, 556-565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
Wood, A.J. and Wollenberg, B.F. (1996) Power Generation, Operation, and Control. 2nd Edition, Wiley.
|
|
[9]
|
Conejo, A.J., Carrión, M. and Morales, J.M. (2010) Decision Making under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets. Springer.
|
|
[10]
|
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
|
|
[11]
|
International Energy Agency (2022) CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. IEA.
|