依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦注射液治疗大面积 脑梗死的临床疗效系统评价
Systematic Review of Clinical Efficacy of Edaravone Combined with Piracetam Injection for Massive Cerebral Infarction
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1641746, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 屈明超*, 王 晟#:无锡市第二人民医院药学部,江苏 无锡;耿 力:江南大学无锡医学院,江苏 无锡
关键词: 依达拉奉吡拉西坦大面积脑梗死系统评价临床疗效Edaravone Piracetam Massive Cerebral Infarction Systematic Review Clinical Efficacy
摘要: 目的:评价依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦注射液治疗大面积脑梗死的临床效果与安全性。方法:检索中国知网、万方、维普及PubMed等数据库(建库至2025年7月),筛选相关随机对照试验(RCT)。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取数据,参照系统评价规范进行质量评价,采用STATA 18.0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入16项RCT (1275例患者)。联合治疗组临床总有效率显著高于单用依达拉奉组(OR = 4.54, 95% CI: 3.10~6.64, P < 0.001);治疗后NIHSS评分更低(MD = −1.94, P < 0.001)、MMSE评分更高(MD = 1.71, P < 0.001)、CSS评分改善更明显(MD = −5.03, P < 0.001)。亚组分析显示,疗程 ≥ 14天亚组OR = 4.72 (95% CI: 3.21~6.93, I2 = 0%),疗效更稳定;异质性主要来源于吡拉西坦剂量(4.0 g/日vs 8.0 g/日)、疗程及患者基线特征。8项研究报告安全性,两组不良反应(轻度胃肠道反应、皮疹)发生率无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦注射液治疗大面积脑梗死可有效改善神经功能与认知水平,安全性良好,疗程建议≥14天,适合基层临床推广使用。
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of edaravone combined with piracetam injection in the treatment of massive cerebral infarction. Methods: Databases including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and PubMed were searched from their inception to July 2025 to screen relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed quality according to systematic review standards. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 18.0 software. Results: A total of 16 RCTs involving 1275 patients were included. The total clinical effective rate in the combination therapy group was significantly higher than that in the edaravone monotherapy group (OR = 4.54, 95% CI: 3.10~6.64, P < 0.001). After treatment, the combination group showed lower NIHSS scores (MD = −1.94, P < 0.001), higher MMSE scores (MD = 1.71, P < 0.001), and more significant improvement in CSS scores (MD = −5.03, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated more stable efficacy in the subgroup with a treatment course ≥14 days (OR = 4.72, 95% CI: 3.21~6.93, I2 = 0%). The main sources of heterogeneity were piracetam dosage (4.0 g/day vs 8.0 g/day), treatment course, and baseline patient characteristics. Eight studies reported safety outcomes, showing no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions (mild gastrointestinal reactions, rash) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of edaravone and piracetam injection for massive cerebral infarction can effectively improve neurological function and cognitive levels with good safety. A treatment course of at least 14 days is recommended, making it suitable for promotion in primary clinical settings.
文章引用:屈明超, 耿力, 王晟. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦注射液治疗大面积 脑梗死的临床疗效系统评价[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 4744-4753. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641746

参考文献

[1] Li, J., Zhang, P., Tao, W., Yi, X., Zhang, J. and Wang, C. (2018) Age‐Specific Clinical Characteristics and Outcome in Patients over 60 Years Old with Large Hemispheric Infarction. Brain and Behavior, 8, e01158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 刘家辰, 张丽芬, 赵晓霞. 大面积脑梗死患者脑疝发生的危险因素构建及验证[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2024, 23(16): 1694-1697.
[3] 江兴, 周玉生, 盘捷, 等. 依达拉奉作用机制和临床应用研究进展[J]. 中南药学, 2013, 11(8): 587-592.
[4] 吴婉玉, 左毅, 廖峻. 疏血通注射液联合吡拉西坦对高血压并急性脑梗死患者的临床疗效[J]. 中成药, 2021, 43(5): 1195-1199.
[5] Higgins, J.P.T., Altman, D.G., Gotzsche, P.C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A.D., et al. (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials. BMJ, 343, d5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组, 中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专委会. 大脑半球大面积梗死监护与治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(9): 645-652.
[7] 各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 1996(6): 60-61.
[8] 郭俊伟. 依达拉奉、吡拉西坦联合治疗对大面积脑梗塞神经功能恢复作用及安全性观察[J]. 四川生理科学杂志, 2022, 44(9): 1682-1683, 1675.
[9] 张慧锋, 马永春. 依达拉奉与吡拉西坦联合治疗大面积脑梗死的疗效研究[J]. 泰山医学院学报, 2020, 41(6): 424-426.
[10] 朱宇红. 面积脑梗塞采用依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗临床疗效观察[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2019, 10(10): 30-31.
[11] 周卫红, 陈朝蓉. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗大面积脑梗死的临床疗效[J]. 大医生, 2019, 4(14): 104-105.
[12] 肖凤. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗大面积脑梗塞患者疗效观察[J]. 中国保健营养, 2018, 28(9): 205.
[13] 张蕊蕊. 大面积脑梗死患者采用依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗的临床效果观察[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(28): 115-116.
[14] 毛惠芳. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗大面积脑梗塞患者疗效观察[J]. 心理医生, 2017, 23(11): 81-82.
[15] 王涛, 吴宏波. 大面积脑梗塞患者采用依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗的疗效观察[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2016, 4(18): 42.
[16] 宋晓征, 李成杰. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦用于大面积脑梗死效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(10): 39-40.
[17] 黄锦凤. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗大面积脑梗塞临床疗效观察[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2015, 26(3): 533-534.
[18] 薛蕊. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗大面积脑梗死的疗效观察[J]. 中国医学创新, 2015(3): 131-133.
[19] 李敬. 大面积脑梗塞患者采用依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗的临床探讨[J]. 医药前沿, 2015(34): 169-170.
[20] 胡亦蓉, 刘毅, 漆伟男. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗大面积脑梗死的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2014(18): 37-38.
[21] 孙雪梅. 大面积脑梗死应用依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦的疗效观察[J]. 中国卫生产业, 2013(30): 118-119.
[22] 于春丽. 依达拉奉联合吡拉西坦治疗大面积脑梗死效果的临床观察[J]. 中国医药指南, 2013(13): 227-228.
[23] 吕俊彬. 依达拉奉与吡拉西坦联用治疗大面积脑梗塞的临床疗效及安全性观察[J]. 医药前沿, 2012(25): 109-110.
[24] 陈文博, 陈锐, 唐妍妍, 等. 醒脑静注射液联合依达拉奉注射液治疗急性脑出血的有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析, 2025, 25(1): 76-80+84.
[25] 刘荣鹏, 逯金金, 谭云泽, 等. 沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠联合左西孟旦治疗射血分数降低型心力衰竭有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 心肺血管病杂志, 2024, 43(9): 984-990.
[26] Du, X., Liu, Q., Li, Q., Yang, Z., Liao, J., Gong, H., et al. (2020) Prognostic Value of Cerebral Infarction Coefficient in Patients with Massive Cerebral Infarction. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 196, Article 106009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] 朱善军, 晏昭, 刘敏, 等. 急性大面积脑梗死患者应用依达拉奉右莰醇注射用浓溶液治疗的临床效果分析[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2024, 28(10): 88-91.