协同治理视角下“五社联动”的运行边界与优化路径研究
Research on the Operational Boundaries and Optimization Paths of “Five-Society Linkage” from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.154324, PDF,   
作者: 冷欣怡:西南民族大学管理学院,四川 成都
关键词: 五社联动协同治理运行边界Five-Society Linkage Collaborative Governance Operating Boundary
摘要: “五社联动”作为破解基层治理难题、构建“共建共治共享”格局的关键机制,其制度优势向治理效能的转化依赖于多元主体协同的精准尺度。然而实践中,该机制普遍陷入“联而不动”与“被动联动”的双重困境,核心症结在于运行边界模糊。文章基于协同治理理论,构建包含功能、权责、资源与行动的四维边界分析框架,系统探讨边界不清对协同有效性的制约。研究表明,清晰界定并动态调适各主体的运行边界,是实现从“形式整合”走向“实质协同”的关键前提。为此,文章提出角色厘定、权责对等、供需匹配、流程梳理等优化路径,旨在为提升“五社联动”整体效能、推进基层治理现代化提供理论支撑与实践参考。
Abstract: The “Five-Society Linkage” mechanism, as a key approach to solving grassroots governance challenges and building a “co-construction, co-governance, and co-sharing” framework, relies on the precise scale of multi-subject collaboration for the transformation of its institutional advantages into governance effectiveness. However, in practice, this mechanism often falls into the dual predicament of “linked but inactive” and “passive linkage”, with the core issue being the ambiguity of operational boundaries. Based on the theory of collaborative governance, this paper constructs a four-dimensional boundary analysis framework encompassing functions, rights and responsibilities, resources, and actions, systematically exploring the constraints of unclear boundaries on collaborative effectiveness. The research indicates that clearly defining and dynamically adjusting the operational boundaries of each subject is a crucial prerequisite for transitioning from “formal integration” to “substantive collaboration”. Therefore, this paper proposes optimization paths such as role clarification, rights and responsibilities parity, supply and demand matching, and process streamlining, aiming to provide theoretical support and practical references for enhancing the overall effectiveness of the “Five-Sector Linkage” and promoting the modernization of grassroots governance.
文章引用:冷欣怡. 协同治理视角下“五社联动”的运行边界与优化路径研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(4): 415-423. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.154324

参考文献

[1] 何荣山, 李婧煜. 共同体视域下“五社联动”构建韧性社区治理现代化体系研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 30(6): 286-300.
[2] 陈晓东, 郭淑洁. 基于协同治理视域“五社联动”助力城市基层社区治理研究[J]. 六盘水师范学院学报, 2025, 37(2): 32-40.
[3] 白玥. “五社联动”机制协同治理的优化路径研究[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2025, 25(5): 74-84, 96.
[4] 徐选国, 陈宝琪, 何楠, 赵一诺, 黄咸悦. 生态性缺失: 基层社会治理中“五社联而不动”的生成根源及破解路径[J]. 社会工作与管理, 2025, 25(1): 58-69.
[5] 张勇. 从“重复叠加”到“协同嵌入”: 社会治理创新中“五社联动”的内在逻辑及优化路径研究[J]. 广州社会主义学院学报, 2024(2): 80-86.
[6] Salamon, L.M. (1987) Partners in Public Service: The Scope and Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations. In: Powell, W.W., Ed., The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, 99-117.
[7] Najam, A. (2000) The Four C’s of Government Third Sector‐Government Relations: Cooperation, Confrontation, Complementarity, and Cooptation. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10, 375-396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 王名. 中国社会组织参与基层治理的路径与机制[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2020: 156-160.
[9] Williams, P. (2002) The Competent Boundary Spanner. Public Administration, 80, 103-124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 任敏, 吕江蕊. “五社联动”的缘起、运作逻辑及其何以促进基层治理[J]. 社会工作, 2023(6): 29-41, 100-101.
[11] 中华人民共和国民政部. “五社联动”助推基层治理体系和治理能力现代化[EB/OL]. 2021-10-26.
http://www.mca.gov.cn/n152/n166/c44896/content.html, 2026-02-23.
[12] Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 郁建兴. 社会治理共同体及其实现路径[J]. 公共管理学报, 2018, 15(4): 1-10.
[14] 徐嫣, 宋世明. 协同治理理论在中国的具体适用研究[J]. 天津社会科学, 2016(2): 74-78.
[15] 顾永红, 刘宇. 行政吸纳服务: 双重委托代理困境下政府购买养老服务策略研究——基于武汉市“五社联动”经验[J]. 社会保障研究, 2022(2): 10-18.
[16] 程远, Jodi Sandfort, 陈飞宇. 信任、权力与组织惯例: 政府以何种策略重塑与非营利组织的关系[J]. 公益研究, 2025(4): 111-132+138.
[17] 及旭. 深化多元主体协同治理夯实中国式现代化根基[N]. 中国改革报, 2025-07-30(003).
[18] 上海市长宁区民政局. 长宁区创新“五社联动”机制提升基层治理效能的工作方案[EB/OL]. 上海: 上海市长宁区民政局.
https://zwgk.shcn.gov.cn/xxgk/shfw-sdpp/2023/164/67904/dc40ae31a2f84879b4fadce7b61d4d8b.pdf?f_link_type=f_linkinlinenote&flow_extra=eyJkb2NfcG9zaXRpb24iOjAsImRvY19pZCI6Ijg0N2I2MzlkYzE3NzMxMDMtNDc3OWMzYWQwYWU1YzBhNSIsImlubGluZV9kaXNwbGF5X3Bvc2l0aW9uIjowfQ%3D%3D, 2023-04-26.
[19] 郑晓军. 跨部门协同的法治界限[J]. 环球法律评论, 2025, 47(2): 150-165.
[20] 邹学银. 迈向基层社会治理现代化: “五社联动”的理论与实践[M]. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 2024.
[21] 周慧. 社会工作嵌入社区治理的专业挑战——基于S机构的质性研究[J]. 山东科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(2): 92-99.