基于APACHE II评分,Lactate和Fibrinogen 联合构建脓毒症患者预后预测模型
Construction of a Prognostic Prediction Model for Patients with Sepsis Based on the Combination of APACHE II Score, Lactate and Fibrinogen
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1641778, PDF,   
作者: 张 雪:西北民族大学医学部,甘肃 兰州;中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九四〇医院检验科,甘肃 兰州;阿赛古丽:西北民族大学医学部,甘肃 兰州;哈小琴*:中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九四〇医院检验科,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 脓毒症病例对照研究Logistic回归列线图Sepsis Case-Control Study Logistic Regression Nomogram
摘要: 目的:探讨影响重症监护室(ICU)脓毒症患者28天预后的独立危险因素,并构建一个稳定、可靠的预测模型。方法:采用病例对照研究设计,回顾性收集2017~2022年中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九四〇医院ICU收治的脓毒症患者的临床资料,根据28天生存状态分为生存组与死亡组。经正态性检验和方差齐性检验确定统计方法,通过组间差异分析筛选出P < 0.05 的变量。建立二元多因素Logistic回归模型并进行列线图可视化,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估模型的区分度。进一步运用DeLong检验、净重新分类指数(NRI)和综合判别改善指数(IDI)评估联合模型相较于单一指标的预测效能改善情况,并通过决策曲线分析(DCA)评价模型的临床净获益。结果:共纳入290例脓毒症患者,其中生存206例(71.0%)、死亡84例(29.0%)。单因素分析显示,高血压史(HTN)、糖尿病史(DM)、年龄、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II (APACHE II)评分、乳酸(lactate)、纤维蛋白原(fibrinogen)与预后显著相关(P < 0.05)。多因素Logistic回归显示,APACHE II评分lactate及fibrinogen是脓毒症死亡的独立影响因素。联合指标构建的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.785,DeLong检验、NRI和IDI均显示联合模型的预测效能显著优于各单一指标。DCA结果显示,模型在0.08~0.91阈值范围内具有临床净获益。结论:基于APACHE II评分、lactate及fibrinogen三个指标构建的脓毒症预后预测模型,具有良好的区分度及临床实用性,可为ICU脓毒症患者早期风险评估提供参考。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the independent influencing factors for the 28-day prognosis of patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) and to develop a stable and reliable predictive model. Methods: A case-control study was conducted. Clinical data of patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU of the 940th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into survivor and non-survivor groups according to their 28-day survival status. Statistical methods were determined after normality and homogeneity of variance tests, and variables with a P value < 0.05 were retained following between-group difference analysis. A binary multivariate logistic regression model was constructed and visualized using a nomogram. The discrimination ability of the model was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. DeLong’s test, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were further applied to assess the improvement in predictive performance of the combined model compared with individual predictors, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical net benefit of the model. Results: A total of 290 patients with sepsis were included, of whom 206 survived (71.0%) and 84 died (29.0%). Univariate analysis revealed that hypertension, diabetes mellitus, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, lactate, and fibrinogen were significantly associated with prognosis (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified APACHE II score, lactate, and fibrinogen as independent influencing factors for sepsis-associated mortality. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the combined model was 0.785. DeLong’s test, NRI and IDI all demonstrated that the combined model exhibited significantly better predictive performance than each individual predictor. DCA showed that the model provided a favorable net clinical benefit across a threshold range of 0.08~0.91. Conclusion: The predictive model based on APACHE II score, lactate, and fibrinogen exhibits good discrimination ability and clinical utility, offering a valuable reference for early risk assessment in ICU patients with sepsis.
文章引用:张雪, 阿赛古丽, 哈小琴. 基于APACHE II评分,Lactate和Fibrinogen 联合构建脓毒症患者预后预测模型[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(4): 5048-5057. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1641778

参考文献

[1] Singer, M., Deutschman, C.S., Seymour, C.W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., et al. (2016) The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 315, 801-810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Yamanaka, Y., Uchida, K., Akashi, M., Watanabe, Y., Yaguchi, A., Shimamoto, S., et al. (2019) Mathematical Modeling of Septic Shock Based on Clinical Data. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 16, Article No. 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Sakr, Y., Jaschinski, U., Wittebole, X., Szakmany, T., Lipman, J., Ñamendys-Silva, S.A., et al. (2018) Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Worldwide Data from the Intensive Care over Nations Audit. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 5, ofy313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Lei, S., Li, X., Zhao, H., Xie, Y. and Li, J. (2022) Prevalence of Sepsis among Adults in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 977094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Levy, M.M., Evans, L.E. and Rhodes, A. (2018) The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update. Critical Care Medicine, 46, 997-1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Kempker, J.A. and Martin, G.S. (2020) A Global Accounting of Sepsis. The Lancet, 395, 168-170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Gao, J., Lu, Y., Ashrafi, N., Domingo, I., Alaei, K. and Pishgar, M. (2024) Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24, Article No. 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Knaus, W.A., Draper, E.A., Wagner, D.P. and Zimmerman, J.E. (1985) APACHE II: A Severity of Disease Classification System. Critical Care Medicine, 13, 818-829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Deniz, M., Ozgun, P. and Ozdemir, E. (2022) Relationships Between RDW, NLR, CAR, and APACHE II Scores in the Context of Predicting the Prognosis and Mortality in ICU Patients. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 26, 4258-4267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Falcão, A.L.E., Barros, A.G.d.A., Bezerra, A.A.M., Ferreira, N.L., Logato, C.M., Silva, F.P., et al. (2019) The Prognostic Accuracy Evaluation of SAPS 3, SOFA and APACHE II Scores for Mortality Prediction in the Surgical ICU: An External Validation Study and Decision-Making Analysis. Annals of Intensive Care, 9, Article No. 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Zhou, T., Zheng, N., Li, X., Zhu, D. and Han, Y. (2021) Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio (NLCR) among Adult ICU Patients in Comparison to APACHE II Score and Conventional Inflammatory Markers: A Multi Center Retrospective Cohort Study. BMC Emergency Medicine, 21, Article No. 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Wang, J., He, L., Jin, Z., Lu, G., Yu, S., Hu, L., et al. (2024) Immune Dysfunction-Associated Elevated RDW, APACHE-II, and SOFA Scores Were a Possible Cause of 28-Day Mortality in Sepsis Patients. Infection and Drug Resistance, 17, 1199-1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 张道英. APACHE II评分与SOFA评分在脓毒症患者的预后评估研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 泰安: 山东第一医科大学, 2019.
[14] Deulkar, P., Singam, A., Mudiganti, V.N.K.S. and Jain, A. (2024) Lactate Monitoring in Intensive Care: A Comprehensive Review of Its Utility and Interpretation. Cureus, 16, e66356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Luo, M. and He, Q. (2023) Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Sepsis Associated-Acute Respiratory Failure Patients on 30-Day Mortality in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 23, Article No. 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Oh, D.H., Kim, M.H., Jeong, W.Y., Kim, Y.C., Kim, E.J., Song, J.E., et al. (2019) Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Low Lactate Level and Septic Shock. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 52, 418-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 周勇, 王真, 秋爽, 陈菲, 熊瑛霞. 血清PCT联合lactate水平对老年COPD合并下呼吸道细菌感染的预后判断价值[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2023, 18(10): 1190-1194.
[18] Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C.M., French, C., et al. (2021) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Critical Care Medicine, 49, e1063-e1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] 梁旭, 李国旗, 张红玉, 库尔班江∙吐尔逊. 血乳酸、IL-6联合SOFA评分对脓毒症患者28 d死亡风险的预测价值[J]. 暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版), 2024, 45(1): 43-50.
[20] Tiscia, G.L. and Margaglione, M. (2018) Human Fibrinogen: Molecular and Genetic Aspects of Congenital Disorders. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19, Article 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 吴维维, 黄素芳, 熊杰, 邓娟. 脓毒症死亡影响因素分析[J]. 中国临床研究, 2024, 37(11): 1680-1685.
[22] Yao, C., Zhang, G., Zhang, N., Li, R., Sun, S., Zhang, L., et al. (2023) Fibrinogen Is Associated with Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis: A Study Based on Cox Regression and Propensity Score Matching. Mediators of Inflammation, 2023, Article ID: 7312822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 孔田玉, 郭苗铃, 杨其霖, 何薇, 蒋芸杰, 温德良. 纤维蛋白原水平与重症监护室脓毒症患者住院死亡率之间的关系[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2023, 29(6): 254-259.
[24] Matsubara, T., Yamakawa, K., Umemura, Y., Gando, S., Ogura, H., Shiraishi, A., et al. (2019) Significance of Plasma Fibrinogen Level and Antithrombin Activity in Sepsis: A Multicenter Cohort Study Using a Cubic Spline Model. Thrombosis Research, 181, 17-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]