智能场景驱动的智能开发课程教学创新研究
Research on Teaching Innovation in Intelligent Development Courses Driven by Intelligent Scenarios
摘要: 针对高校智能开发类课程存在的语言中心化、课赛分离及工程能力培养不足等问题,本文围绕课赛融合与人机协同驱动,提出面向系统构造能力培养的课程重构方案。首先,构建“计算表达–系统构造–智能实现”三层能力递进模型,优化课程目标结构;其次,以智能应用场景为主线,融合竞赛问题范式重组教学内容,实现课堂学习与算法训练的协同推进;同时设计贯穿学期的渐进式系统开发任务链,引入大模型辅助编程机制,形成“生成–审辨–优化–验证”的人机协同闭环。通过阶段性竞赛强化与工程化评价方式,促进基础能力、算法能力与系统实现能力的协同提升。实践表明,该体系有效增强了学生的复杂问题建模与系统构建能力。
Abstract: To address the issues of language-centered instruction, separation between coursework and competitions, and insufficient cultivation of engineering competence in intelligent development courses at universities, this study proposes a curriculum reconstruction framework oriented toward system construction capability, driven by course-competition integration and human-AI collaboration. First, a three-level progressive capability model—“computational expression, system construction, and intelligent implementation”—is established to optimize the structure of course objectives. Second, teaching content is reorganized around intelligent application scenarios, integrating competition-style problem paradigms to align classroom learning with algorithmic training. Meanwhile, a semester-long progressive system development task chain is designed, together with a large-model-assisted programming mechanism, forming a human-AI collaborative loop of “generation-analysis-optimization-validation”. Through staged competition reinforcement and an engineering-oriented evaluation approach, the reform promotes the coordinated development of foundational skills, algorithmic competence, and system implementation ability. Practice demonstrates that the proposed framework effectively enhances students’ abilities in complex problem modeling and system construction.
文章引用:孙博文, 高梦琦, 王家辉, 申奥. 智能场景驱动的智能开发课程教学创新研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(4): 1392-1402. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.164793

参考文献

[1] Achiam, J., et al. (2023) GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv: 2303.08774.
[2] Sébastien, B., Varun, C., Ronen, E., et al. (2023) Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4. arXiv: 2303.12712.
[3] 钟登华. 新工科建设的内涵与行动[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2017(3): 1-6.
[4] 吴岩. 新工科: 高等工程教育的未来——对高等教育未来的战略思考[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018(6): 1-3.
[5] 林健. 面向未来的中国新工科建设[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2017, 38(2): 26-35.
[6] 杨宗凯, 王俊, 吴砥, 等. ChatGPT/生成式人工智能对教育的影响探析及应对策略[J]. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), 2023, 41(7): 26-35.
[7] 雨薇杨. 基于OBE的高校Python程序设计教学目标与评价体系改革[J]. 计算机科学技术与应用, 2025, 2(8): 12-14.
[8] 施晓秋, 徐嬴颖. 工程教育认证与产教融合共同驱动的人才培养体系建设[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2019(2): 33-39, 56.
[9] 李秀, 陆军, 牛颂杰, 等. 人工智能时代计算机基础课程建设与教育教学思考[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2024, 45(2): 42-49, 70.
[10] 陈康, 王丹丹. 面向应用开发的计算机实践教学模式改革[J]. 科教导刊(下旬), 2016(21): 79-80.
[11] 曾新, 王梅良, 李高权, 等. Python程序设计语言实验教学模式探讨[J]. 实验科学与技术, 2024, 22(2): 54-58.
[12] 孙世温, 魏一静, 王志欣. 程序设计类课程思政教学的探索与实践——以C语言课程为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2025, 13(6): 178-184.
[13] Becker, B.A. and Quille, K. (2019). 50 Years of CS1 at SIGCSE: A Review of the Evolution of Introductory Programming Education Research. Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Minneapolis, 27 February-2 March 2019, 338-344.[CrossRef
[14] Luxton-Reilly, A., Simon, Albluwi, I., Becker, B.A., Giannakos, M., Kumar, A.N., et al. (2018) Introductory Programming: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Larnaca, 2-4 July 2018, 55-106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Fangohr, H., O’Brien, N., Prabhakar, A., et al. (2015) Teaching Python Programming with Automatic Assessment and Feedback Provision. arXiv: 1509.03556.