职务科技成果赋权改革对高校专利产出的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Empowerment Reform of Job-Related Scientific Achievements on University Patent Output
摘要: 在创新驱动发展战略背景下,如何有效破解科技成果转化不畅的体制障碍已成为关键议题。高校作为国家战略科技力量的重要组成部分,其专利转化效率直接影响国家创新体系整体效能。本文基于2016~2023年59所高校的面板数据,采用双重差分法系统评估职务科技成果赋权改革的政策效应。研究发现,赋权改革显著促进了高校专利转化数量和专利质量的提升,体现出“提质增效”的政策效果,而对专利申请数量的影响相对有限。异质性检验发现,赋权改革对理工类、“211及省部共建”高校以及东部地区高校的促进作用更为突出。机制分析表明,改革通过明晰产权边界、强化内在激励,引导科研人员从追求“数量”转向注重“价值”。研究为深化赋权改革、优化高校专利治理提供了实证依据与政策启示。
Abstract: Under the innovation-driven development strategy, effectively addressing institutional barriers to technology transfer has become a critical issue. As a vital component of national strategic scientific and technological forces, universities patent conversion efficiency directly impacts the overall effectiveness of the national innovation system. Based on panel data from 59 universities between 2016 and 2023, this study systematically evaluates the policy effects of empowerment reform of job-related scientific achievements through the difference-in-differences method. The research reveals that the reform significantly enhances both the quantity and quality of university patent conversions, demonstrating a “quality-enhancement and efficiency-improvement” policy effect, while having relatively limited impact on patent application numbers. Heterogeneity tests indicate that the reform’s positive effects are more pronounced in science and engineering disciplines, “Project 211 and Provincially and Ministerially Co-Constructed” universities, and institutions in eastern China. Mechanism analysis shows that the reform clarifies property rights boundaries and strengthens intrinsic incentives, guiding researchers to shift focus from “quantity” to “value”. This study provides empirical evidence and policy insights for deepening empowerment reform and optimizing university patent governance.
文章引用:凌菲, 万国芳. 职务科技成果赋权改革对高校专利产出的影响研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(4): 473-488. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.164173

参考文献

[1] 邓志红. 高校职务科技成果的权利配置规则研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(2): 259-265.
[2] 卓柳俊. 我国职务科技成果共有制的正当性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2020.
[3] Caldera, A. and Debande, O. (2010) Performance of Spanish Universities in Technology Transfer: An Empirical Analysis. Research Policy, 39, 1160-1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 张铭慎. 切实强化科技成果转化中的有效产权激励[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2018(11): 72-75.
[5] Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S.J. and Roland Ortt, J. (2018) Roles during Innovation Ecosystem Genesis: A Literature Review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 李万, 常静, 王敏杰, 朱学彦, 金爱民. 创新3.0与创新生态系统[J]. 科学学研究, 2014, 32(12): 1761-1770.
[7] 许秀梅, 王慧. 职务成果赋权改革对高校创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 中国高校科技, 2022(12): 20-26.
[8] 王兆丁, 李子和, 夏亮辉. 制约高校专利申请的因素分析及应对对策[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2002(8): 27-28.
[9] Giummo, J. (2010) German Employee Inventors’ Compensation Records: A Window into the Returns to Patented Inventions. Research Policy, 39, 969-984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 李晓娣, 张小燕. 区域创新生态系统对区域创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 2018, 37(5): 22-28+55.
[11] 孙亚梅, 吕永龙, 王铁宇, 等. 基于专利的区域环境技术创新水平空间分异研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2007(3): 123-129.
[12] Kenney, M. and Patton, D. (2011) Does Inventor Ownership Encourage University Research-Derived Entrepreneurship? A Six University Comparison. Research Policy, 40, 1100-1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 翟晓舟. 职务科技成果转化收益配置中的权责规范化研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(20): 128-133.
[14] Santoro, D. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (2003) Relationship Dynamics between University Research Centers and Industrial Firms: Their Impact on Technology Transfer Activities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 17-30.
[15] 李强, 暴丽艳. 职务科技成果转化收益分配比例与科研人员激励——基于委托代理理论视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(2): 233-240.
[16] 王进富, 朱玉丹, 张颖颖, 等. 科研人员职务科技成果赋权、组织能力与衍生创业间关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(20): 111-120.
[17] 丁明磊. 地方探索职务科技成果权属混合所有制改革的思考与建议[J]. 科学管理研究, 2018, 36(1): 17-20+45.
[18] Thomas, J.P. (2002) The Responsibility of the Rule Maker: Comparative Approaches to Patent Administration Reform. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 17, 728-761.
[19] 黄微. 基于专利质量测度的企业专利产出效率研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2008.
[20] 李明, 陈向东, 宋爽. 基于专利存续期的中国专利质量演变研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(9): 26-36.