柠条根际促生芽孢杆菌的分离、鉴定及功能 分析
Isolation, Identification, and Functional Analysis of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacillus Strains Associated with the Rhizosphere of Caragana korshinskii Kom.
DOI: 10.12677/ije.2026.152024, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘思源, 万永青, 郜晋楠:内蒙古农业大学生命科学学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;杨金耀:杭锦旗林业和草原事业发展中心,内蒙古 鄂尔多斯;满都拉*:内蒙古农业大学食品科学与工程学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 柠条促生菌复合菌剂微生物群落芽孢杆菌Caragana korshinskii Kom. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Compound Microbial Inoculants Microbial Community Bacillus
摘要: 内蒙古自治区作为我国北方的重要生态屏障,承担着我国23%的防沙重任。柠条(Caragana korshinskii Kom.)作为耐旱植物,在防风固沙和水土保持中发挥重要作用。为保证人工栽培柠条的发芽和幼苗生长,本研究分离筛选柠条根际促生菌、评价其促生性能,构建复合菌剂并通过盆栽实验研究最佳菌种组合,分析菌剂对柠条理化指标、土壤指标和根际微生物的影响。结果表明,从柠条根际土壤和平茬废弃物中分离得到84株芽孢杆菌(Bacillus),筛选出产吲哚乙酸、解磷、解钾和拮抗功能的菌株11株,其中SGA510、SC21和B180可显著促进柠条种子萌发和幼苗生长(p < 0.05),萌发率分别提高4%、5%和9.33%,株高分别增长14.23%、10.01%和12.12%,经鉴定,SGA510为植物内芽孢杆菌(B. endophyticus),SC21和B180为枯草芽孢杆菌(B. subtilis)。构建的SGB (SGA510 + SC21)和SCB (SC21 + B180)复合菌剂能够分别显著提升柠条株高25.3%和27.3%、叶片数30.3%和20.6% (p < 0.05)。此外,两种复合菌剂还能显著提高柠条叶绿素含量和超氧化物歧化酶活力,降低丙二醛含量,提升土壤蔗糖酶活性,且SGB还能显著提高土壤速效磷含量(p < 0.05)。根际微生物分析结果显示,SGA510、SGB和SCB可显著降低根际微生物丰富度(p < 0.05),但不改变土壤本身菌群结构(p > 0.05)。其中,SC21、SGB和SCB可提高变形菌门(Proteobacteria)丰度(分别为8.2%、7.1%和17.2%),降低纤维弧菌属(Cellvibrio)丰度,SGA510、SC21、SGB和SCB可提高马赛菌属(Massilia)丰度。综上,本研究筛选出高效促生菌株并构建复合菌剂,改善了柠条根际微环境、提高了柠条生物量,为内蒙古荒漠化地区治理和可持续发展提供了一种微生物解决思路。
Abstract: As an important ecological barrier in northern China, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region bears 23% of the nation’s major sand control responsibility. Caragana korshinskii Kom., a drought-tolerant plant, plays a key role in windbreak and sand fixation as well as soil and water conservation. To ensure the germination and seedling growth of cultivated C. korshinskii, this study isolated and screened plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) from the rhizosphere of C. korshinskii, evaluated their growth-promoting traits, constructed composite microbial inoculants, and investigated the optimal bacterial combinations through pot experiments. The effects of the inoculants on the physicochemical indices of C. korshinskii, soil properties, and rhizosphere microbial community were analyzed. Results showed that 84 Bacillus strains were isolated from rhizosphere soil and pruning residues of C. korshinskii. Among them, 11 strains exhibited capabilities such as IAA production, phosphate solubilization, potassium solubilization, and antagonistic activity. Three strains, SGA510, SC21, and B180, significantly promoted seed germination and seedling growth of C. korshinskii (p < 0.05), increasing germination rates by 4%, 5%, and 9.33%, respectively, and plant heights by 14.23%, 10.01%, and 12.12%, respectively. SGA510 was identified as B. endophyticus, while SC21 and B180 were identified as B. subtilis. The composite inoculants SGB (SGA510 + SC21) and SCB (SC21 + B180) significantly increased plant height by 25.3% and 27.3%, and leaf number by 30.3% and 20.6%, respectively (p < 0.05). Moreover, both composite inoculants significantly increased chlorophyll content and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and enhanced soil sucrase activity. Additionally, SGB significantly increased soil available phosphorus content (p < 0.05). Rhizosphere microbial analysis revealed that SGA510, SGB, and SCB significantly reduced rhizosphere microbial richness (p < 0.05) but did not alter the overall soil microbial community structure (p > 0.05). Specifically, SC21, SGB, and SCB increased the abundance of Proteobacteria (by 8.2%, 7.1%, and 17.2%, respectively) and reduced the abundance of Cellvibrio; SGA510, SC21, SGB, and SCB increased the abundance of Massilia. In conclusion, this study screened highly efficient growth-promoting bacterial strains and constructed composite inoculants, which improved the rhizosphere microenvironment and increased the biomass of C. korshinskii, providing a microbial approach for desertification control and sustainable development in Inner Mongolia.
文章引用:刘思源, 万永青, 郜晋楠, 杨金耀, 满都拉. 柠条根际促生芽孢杆菌的分离、鉴定及功能 分析[J]. 世界生态学, 2026, 15(2): 229-244. https://doi.org/10.12677/ije.2026.152024

参考文献

[1] 宋思梦, 林冬梅, 周恒宇, 等. 种植巨菌草对乌兰布和沙漠植物物种多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(9): 1595-1605.
[2] 候腾思, 沈艳, 马红彬, 等. 柠条平茬对荒漠草原土壤水分特征及水量平衡的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(8): 15-24.
[3] Zhang, L., Fan, J., Meng, Q., Niu, Y. and Niu, W. (2013) Caragana Fabr. PROMOTES Revegetation and Soil Rehabilitation in Saline-Alkali Wasteland. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 15, 38-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Lu, Q., Ma, H., Zhou, Y., Calvelo-Pereira, R. and Shen, Y. (2022) Caragana korshinskii Kom. Plantation Reduced Soil Aggregate Stability and Aggregate-Associated Organic Carbon on Desert Steppe. PeerJ, 10, e12507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 王效帅. 柠条的种植技术及饲用方法[J]. 现代畜牧科技, 2016(9): 50.
[6] 牛西午, 张强, 杨治平, 等. 柠条人工林对晋西北土壤理化性质变化的影响研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003(4): 628-632.
[7] Fu, B., Liu, Y., Lü, Y., He, C., Zeng, Y. and Wu, B. (2011) Assessing the Soil Erosion Control Service of Ecosystems Change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Complexity, 8, 284-293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Ma, Y., Rajkumar, M. and Freitas, H. (2009) Improvement of Plant Growth and Nickel Uptake by Nickel Resistant-Plant-Growth Promoting Bacteria. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 166, 1154-1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Goswami, D., Thakker, J.N. and Dhandhukia, P.C. (2016) Portraying Mechanics of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): A Review. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 2, Article ID: 1127500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] He, S., Li, L., Lv, M., Wang, R., Wang, L., Yu, S., et al. (2024) PGPR: Key to Enhancing Crop Productivity and Achieving Sustainable Agriculture. Current Microbiology, 81, Article No. 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 李思铭, 于潇, 彭志伟, 等. 黄河三角洲芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定及其盐胁迫下对田菁的促生作用[J]. 微生物学报, 2025, 65(7): 2920-2937.
[12] Yang, J., Lan, L., Jin, Y., Yu, N., Wang, D. and Wang, E. (2022) Mechanisms Underlying Legume-Rhizobium Symbioses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 64, 244-267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 马雪晴, 冀傲冉, 郑娇莉, 等. 植物根际促生菌促生机制及其应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报(中英文), 2025, 27(2): 13-23.
[14] Quijada, N.M., Hernández, M. and Rodríguez-Lázaro, D. (2020) High-Throughput Sequencing and Food Microbiology. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, 91, 275-300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Dongare, D.B., Nishad, S.S., Mastoli, S.Y., Saraf, S.A., Srivastava, N. and Dey, A. (2025) High-Throughput Sequencing: A Breakthrough in Molecular Diagnosis for Precision Medicine. Functional & Integrative Genomics, 25, Article No. 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] 银婷婷, 王敬敬, 柳影, 等. 高效解磷菌的筛选及其促生机制的初步研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2015, 31(12): 234-242.
[17] Li, H., Han, Q., Liu, Q., Gan, Y., Rensing, C., Rivera, W.L., et al. (2023) Roles of Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria in Mediating Soil Legacy Phosphorus Availability. Microbiological Research, 272, Article ID: 127375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] 陈腊, 米国华, 李可可, 等. 多功能植物根际促生菌对东北黑土区玉米的促生效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2759-2766.
[19] 迟惠荣, 张亚惠, 曾欣, 等. 多花黄精内生贝莱斯芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定及其抗菌与促生作用分析[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(4): 122-131.
[20] 谌帅, 舒枭, 李思悦, 等. 微生物菌剂对猕猴桃根际土壤理化性质和真菌群落的影响[J]. 地质通报, 2026, 45(1): 121-132.
[21] Garrity, G.M., Brenner, D.J., Krieg, N.R. and Staley, J.T. (2004) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer.
[22] 黄曦, 许兰兰, 黄荣韶, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌在抑制植物病原菌中的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2010(1): 24-29.
[23] Bueno, C.B., dos Santos, R.M., de Souza Buzo, F., de Andrade da Silva, M.S.R. and Rigobelo, E.C. (2022) Effects of Chemical Fertilization and Microbial Inoculum on Bacillus Subtilis Colonization in Soybean and Maize Plants. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, Article 901157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] 文钟灵, 杨旻恺, 陈星雨, 等. 酸铝胁迫土壤中耐铝大豆根际不同部位细菌群落结构、功能及其对促生菌富集作用的研究[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(5): 487-507.
[25] 宋以玲, 于建, 陈士更, 等. 复合微生物菌剂对棉花生理特性及根际土壤微生物和化学性质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2019, 51(3): 477-487.
[26] Li, C., Sun, L., Jia, Z., Tang, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, J., et al. (2024) Microbial Inoculants Drive Changes in Soil and Plant Microbiomes and Improve Plant Functions in Abandoned Mine Restoration. Plant, Cell & Environment, 48, 1162-1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Syed Nabi, R.b., Shahzad, R., Tayade, R., Shahid, M., Hussain, A., Ali, M.W., et al. (2021) Evaluation Potential of PGPR to Protect Tomato against fusarium Wilt and Promote Plant Growth. PeerJ, 9, e11194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 陈贵, 胡文玉, 谢甫绨, 等. 提取植物体内MDA的溶剂及MDA作为衰老指标的探讨[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1991(1): 44-46.
[29] 赵世杰, 许长成, 邹琦, 孟庆伟. 植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1994(3): 207-210.
[30] 何乐韵, 周后珍, 谭周亮, 等. 活性污泥中超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性测定影响因素[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2012, 35(12): 146-149.
[31] Nagrale, D.T., Chaurasia, A., Kumar, S., Gawande, S.P., Hiremani, N.S., Shankar, R., et al. (2023) PGPR: The Treasure of Multifarious Beneficial Microorganisms for Nutrient Mobilization, Pest Biocontrol and Plant Growth Promotion in Field Crops. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 39, Article No. 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Li, X., Zhao, S., Zheng, N., et al. (2019) Progress in Bacterial Urease Complexes and Their Activation Mechanisms. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 35, 204-215.
[33] Li, C., Chen, X., Jia, Z., Zhai, L., Zhang, B., Grüters, U., et al. (2024) Meta-Analysis Reveals the Effects of Microbial Inoculants on the Biomass and Diversity of Soil Microbial Communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 8, 1270-1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] 毛思业, 周瑚, 郑昕威, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌YN145的发酵条件优化及活性物质分析[J]. 农药, 2025, 64(2): 106-114, 141.
[35] Kim, H., Lee, S., Jo, H.Y., Finneran, K.T. and Kwon, M.J. (2021) Diversity and Composition of Soil Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria Communities as a Bacterial Indicator of Past Land-Use Change from Forest to Farmland. Science of The Total Environment, 797, Article ID: 148944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Bhatti, A.A., Haq, S. and Bhat, R.A. (2017) Actinomycetes Benefaction Role in Soil and Plant Health. Microbial Pathogenesis, 111, 458-467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] 王光华, 刘俊杰, 于镇华, 等. 土壤酸杆菌门细菌生态学研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(2): 14-20.
[38] Li, H., Zhao, Q. and Huang, H. (2019) Current States and Challenges of Salt-Affected Soil Remediation by Cyanobacteria. Science of The Total Environment, 669, 258-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] 杨恩东, 崔丹曦, 汪维云. 马赛菌属细菌研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2019, 46(6): 1537-1548.