元治理视域下“村改居”社区社会治理路径研究——以扬州市雷塘社区为例
Research on the Path of Social Governance in “Village-to-Residence” Communities from the Perspective of Metagovernance—A Case Study of Leitang Community in Yangzhou City
摘要: 在城市化加速推进背景下,“村改居”社区作为城乡转型的特殊产物,面临着多元主体协同不畅、制度衔接失衡、治理效能不足等深层次困境。元治理作为“对治理的治理”,强调由权威主体对科层、市场、自治等治理模式进行顶层设计、统筹协调与规则校准,为破解此类社区治理难题提供了系统性视角。本文以扬州市雷塘社区这一典型“城中村型村改居”社区为案例,通过文献分析法、实地调研法、案例分析法等研究方法,探析其治理实践现状、成效与现存问题。研究发现,雷塘社区依托“三以九微”等工作法,在网格治理、多元服务等方面取得显著成效,但仍存在元治理统筹主体缺位、协同机制不健全、制度衔接不畅等困境。基于此,本文构建“统筹规制–制度保障–多元参与–效能提升”的元治理优化框架,以期为“村改居”社区治理现代化提供实践参考。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of accelerated urbanization, “village-to-residence” communities, as a special product of urban-rural transformation, are confronted with deep-seated dilemmas including inadequate coordination among multiple stakeholders, unbalanced institutional connection, and insufficient governance efficiency. As the “governance of governance”, metagovernance emphasizes that an authoritative entity should conduct top-level design, overall coordination and rule calibration for hierarchical, market, autonomous and other governance models, providing a systematic perspective for solving such governance dilemmas in these communities. Taking Leitang Community in Yangzhou, a typical “urban-village type village-to-residence” community, as a case, this paper explores the current situation, achievements and existing problems of its governance practice by means of literature analysis, field investigation and case analysis. The study finds that relying on the working methods such as the “Three Orientations and Nine Micros”, Leitang Community has achieved remarkable results in grid governance and diversified services, but still faces dilemmas including the absence of a metagovernance coordinating entity, imperfect coordination mechanisms and poor institutional connection. Accordingly, this paper constructs a metagovernance optimization framework of “overall regulation, institutional guarantee, multi-stakeholder participation and efficiency improvement”, so as to provide practical references for the modernization of governance in “village-to-residence” communities.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张娜. 村改居社区微治理面临的困境与对策——以郑岭社区为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2024.
|
|
[2]
|
鲍勃∙杰索普, 程浩. 治理与元治理: 必要的反思性、必要的多样性和必要的反讽性[J]. 国外理论动态, 2014(5): 14-22.
|
|
[3]
|
刘祖云, 李烊. 元治理视角下“过渡型社区”治理的结构与策略[J]. 社会科学, 2017(1): 11-20.
|
|
[4]
|
张平, 隋永强. 一核多元: 元治理视域下的中国城市社区治理主体结构[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2015(5): 49-55.
|
|
[5]
|
刘梦姣. “村改居”社区治理研究——以T市W社区为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 山西大学, 2025.
|
|
[6]
|
丁冬汉. 从“元治理”理论视角构建服务型政府[J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2010, 28(5): 18-24.
|
|
[7]
|
熊惠平. 新市民的社会关系的重构: 以村改居为途径或方式[J]. 生产力研究, 2011(10): 35-36.
|
|
[8]
|
杨绘荣, 刘佳佳. “村改居”居民文化认同的消解与重塑——多元空间的视域[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(3): 34-44.
|
|
[9]
|
于慧, 娄成武. 元治理视域下乡村治理创新何以可能[J]. 农业经济, 2024(8): 50-52.
|
|
[10]
|
陈军亚, 李慧宇. 转型社区治理共同体的构建路径与逻辑——以湖北省武汉市J社区的实践探索为例[J]. 理论与改革, 2024(6): 81-90+173-174.
|
|
[11]
|
崔宝琛, 彭华民. 空间重构视角下“村改居”社区治理[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2020(3): 76-83.
|
|
[12]
|
吴莹. 空间变革下的治理策略——“村改居”社区基层治理转型研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2017, 32(6): 94-116+244.
|