数据类型对三维广域电磁法勘探效果的影响
The Impact of Data Types on the Effectiveness of 3D WFEM
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2026.164056, PDF,   
作者: 吴金涛:中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院,湖南 长沙
关键词: 广域电磁法三维反演数据类型有限内存拟牛顿法Wide Field Electromagnetic Method 3D Inversion Data Type L-BFGS
摘要: 为探讨不同数据类型对三维广域电磁法反演成像效果的影响,文章基于三维数值模拟与反演计算,对电场与磁场不同分量的数据响应特征及其成像能力进行了系统分析。采用谱元法实现三维正演计算,并结合有限内存拟牛顿算法(L-BFGS)构建三维反演框架。通过设计典型低阻异常模型,对Ex复分量、振幅数据以及Hy、Hz复分量及其组合形式进行了对比反演研究。结果表明:Ex复分量反演在异常体形态恢复、边界刻画及电阻率定量估计方面明显优于单纯振幅反演;Hy分量对横向电性变化敏感性较弱,单分量反演成像能力有限;Hz分量对三维结构具有一定响应优势,但分辨率仍低于电场分量。多分量联合反演虽可增强数据约束,但同时可能加剧模型多解性,对正则化参数与结构约束依赖更高。研究结果为广域电磁法三维反演数据类型的合理选择提供了理论依据。
Abstract: To investigate the impact of different data types on the imaging effects of 3D WFEM, this paper conducts a systematic analysis of the response characteristics and imaging capabilities of different components of electric and magnetic field data based on 3D numerical simulation and inversion calculations. The spectral element method is used to achieve 3D forward modeling, and combined with the L-BFGS algorithm, a 3D inversion framework is constructed. By designing typical low-resistivity anomaly models, comparative inversion studies are conducted for the Ex complex component, amplitude data, as well as Hy and Hz complex components and their combinations. The results show that: inversion using the Ex complex component is significantly better than simple amplitude inversion in terms of recovering the anomaly shape, delineating boundaries, and quantitatively estimating resistivity; the Hy component has weak sensitivity to lateral electrical variations, and single-component inversion has limited imaging capability; the Hz component has certain advantages in responding to 3D structures, but its resolution is still lower than that of electric field components. Although multi-component joint inversion can enhance data constraints, it may also exacerbate model non-uniqueness, increasing dependence on regularization parameters and structural constraints. The results provide a theoretical basis for the rational selection of data types in 3D regional electromagnetic inversion.
文章引用:吴金涛. 数据类型对三维广域电磁法勘探效果的影响[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(4): 612-622. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.164056

参考文献

[1] 何继善, 张大伟, 蒋奇云, 等. 广域电磁法技术进展与多领域应用综述[J/OL]. 中国有色金属学报, 2026, 36(2): 409-429.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/43.1238.TG.20250928.1708.001, 2026-03-12.
[2] 王腾飞. 广域电磁法在深部金属矿勘查中的三维反演与资源预测[J]. 世界有色金属, 2026(3): 172-174.
[3] 徐锦通, 汤井田. 基于谱元法的广域电磁法三维正演模拟[J]. 地球物理学报, 2022, 65(4): 1461-1471.
[4] 谭歌, 原源, 苗成宏. 地空广域电磁法三维反演效果影响因素分析[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2026, 40(1): 100-106.
[5] 何洪森, 何卫峰, 谭章坤, 等. 广域电磁法场源布置受地质条件的影响研究[J]. 四川地质学报, 2025, 45(S1): 97-100+105.
[6] 朱云起, 李帝铨, 刘最亮, 等. 煤矿CSAMT数据的广域电磁法处理[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2023, 51(4): 133-142.
[7] 周印明, 王金海, 胡晓颖, 等. 基于矢量位和标量位的广域电磁法三维有限元数值模拟[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2021, 56(1): 181-189+12.
[8] 翁爱华, 李大俊, 李亚彬, 等. 数据类型对三维地面可控源电磁勘探效果的影响[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(2): 697-708.
[9] 张林成, 周聪, 汤井田, 等. 双分量广域电磁法在深埋隧洞工程勘察中的应用[J]. 地质与勘探, 2022, 58(4): 857-864.
[10] 戴世坤, 陈轻蕊, 凌嘉宣, 等. 空间-波数域三维大地电磁场积分方程法数 值模拟[J]. 地球物理学报, 2022, 65(6): 2294-2310.
[11] 殷长春, 刘云鹤, 熊彬. 地球物理三维电磁反演方法研究动态[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2020, 50(3): 432-435.
[12] 胡英才. 矢量有限元三维张量CSAMT正演模拟研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015.
[13] 李建慧, Colin G. Farquharson, 胡祥云, 等. 基于电场总场矢量有限元法的接地长导线源三维正演[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59(4): 1521-1534.
[14] 张继锋, 刘寄仁, 冯兵, 等. 三维陆地可控源电磁法有限元模型降阶快速正演[J]. 地球物理学报, 2020, 63(9): 3520-33.
[15] 岳鹏. 可控源音频大地电磁二维约束反演研究与应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2019.
[16] 彭荣华, 胡祥云, 李建慧, 等. 基于二次耦合势的广域电磁法有限体积三维正演计算[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61(10): 4160-4170.
[17] Viezzoli, A., Auken, E. and Munday, T. (2009) Spatially Constrained Inversion for Quasi 3D Modelling of Airborne Electromagnetic Data—An Application for Environmental Assessment in the Lower Murray Region of South Australia. Exploration Geophysics, 40, 173-183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Siemon, B., Auken, E. and Christiansen, A.V. (2009) Laterally Constrained Inversion of Helicopter-Borne Frequency-Domain Electromagnetic Data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 67, 259-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Christensen, N.B., Reid, J.E. and Halkjær, M. (2009) Fast, Laterally Smooth Inversion of Airborne Time‐Domain Electromagnetic Data. Near Surface Geophysics, 7, 599-612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef