研究生债法课程思政建设的三维逻辑探索

Exploring the Trinity Logic of Ideological and Political Construction in Graduate Debt Law Courses

摘要: 研究生课程思政教育面临着如何从表面阐释走向深度融入的挑战。债法作为法学专业研究生的核心课程，具有高度的理论性与多元的价值取向。加之，研究生阶段的课程思政应当与本科生阶段的课程思政形成区别。这导致研究生债法课程思政建设存在诸多症结，主要体现为内容设计脱节、过程实施简化、评价机制薄弱等。对于这些症结问题的解决可从三个维度展开探索：维度一是“顶层设计”，重塑债法课程的教学目标与大纲内容，实现知识传授与价值引领的统一，构建中国债法自主知识体系的教学实践；维度二是“方法创新”，实施“三阶实践教学法”，课前用社会热点法律事件导入，课中采用角色代入与庭审案例研讨进行互动，课后对学习成果进行转化和延伸；维度三是“范式革新”，建立综合评价体系以精准监测思政成效。

Abstract: The ideological and political education in graduate curricula faces the challenge of transitioning from superficial interpretation to deep integration. As a core course for graduate students majoring in law, Debt Law is highly theoretical and encompasses diverse value orientations. Moreover, the ideological and political education at the graduate level should be distinct from that at the undergraduate level. These factors contribute to several persistent issues in the ideological and political construction of graduate-level Debt Law courses, primarily manifested as disconnection in content design, oversimplification in implementation, and weak evaluation mechanisms. To address these issues, exploration can be conducted from three dimensions: Dimension 1: Top-Level Design—restructuring the teaching objectives and syllabi of the Debt Law course to unify knowledge impartation and value guidance, and to develop teaching practices that construct an autonomous knowledge system of Chinese Debt Law; Dimension 2: Method Innovation—implementing a “three-stage practical teaching methodology,” which introduces socio-legal hot topics before class, employs role-playing and courtroom case studies for interaction during class, and transforms and extends learning outcomes after class; Dimension 3: Paradigm Reform—establishing a comprehensive evaluation system to accurately monitor the effectiveness of ideological and political education.