福州长乐国际机场春季低能见度天气的分型与物理机制诊断——以2023年三次典型过程为例
Diagnosis of Weather Types and Physical Mechanisms of Low Visibility in Spring at Fuzhou Changle International Airport—Taking Three Typical Processes in 2023 as Examples
摘要: 利用ERA5再分析资料(原始分辨率0.25˚ × 0.25˚,为精细化诊断插值处理为0.1˚ × 0.1˚)及长乐机场地面观测报文,对2023年春季发生的三次典型低能见度天气过程(高压入海回流型、锋前暖区型、均压场静稳型)进行了对比诊断分析。结果表明:(1) 高压入海回流型主要受变性高压南侧偏东气流驱动,海面水汽经地形抬升后在950 hPa以下形成深厚饱和层,导致低云(BKN004)维持;(2) 锋前暖区型由西南低空急流主导,强盛的暖湿平流使得近地层温露差迅速归零(T − Td = 0℃),形成爆发性平流雾,此类型湿度层深厚且伴有显著的增温特征;(3) 均压场静稳型发生在弱气压梯度背景下,地面微风(<2 m/s)配合夜间辐射降温,在近地层形成逆温封锁,不利于水汽垂直扩散。本研究建立了基于动力场与湿度场配置的预报着眼点,为机场二类盲降保障提供参考。
Abstract: Objective: Low visibility weather, such as fog and low clouds, is a critical factor affecting flight safety and efficiency at coastal airports. Fuzhou Changle International Airport (ZSFZ), located on the southeast coast of China, frequently experiences low visibility events in spring, posing significant challenges to flight operations (e.g., CAT II landings). This study aims to classify the synoptic patterns and reveal the physical mechanisms behind three typical low visibility events in the spring of 2023, providing theoretical support for operational forecasting. Data and Methods: Based on the METAR observations from ZSFZ and the ERA5 reanalysis data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) (original resolution 0.25˚ × 0.25˚, interpolated to 0.1˚ × 0.1˚ for fine-scale profile analysis), this paper analyzes the evolution of meteorological parameters including visibility, ceiling, horizontal wind field, vertical velocity, and relative humidity. Results: The study identifies three distinct weather types: (1) High-Pressure Reflux Type (Case of March 24~25, 2023): This event was characterized by a degenerated cold high-pressure system moving eastward into the sea. The diagnostic analysis shows that the easterly airflow transported abundant moisture from the sea to the land. The relative humidity below 950 hPa exceeded 95%, and the topographic uplift effect maintained the low cloud ceiling at approximately 120 meters (BKN004). (2) Pre-frontal Warm Sector Type (Case of February 12, 2023): This type occurred in the warm sector ahead of a frontal cyclone. A strong southwesterly low-level jet was observed at 925 hPa, acting as a “moisture conveyor belt.” The warm and moist advection caused the surface temperature-dew point spread (T-Td) to drop to 0˚C rapidly. (3) Equal Pressure Field/Static Stability Type (Case of April 14~15, 2023): This event occurred under a weak pressure gradient field. The vertical profile indicates that the near-surface wind speed was extremely weak (<2 m/s), and a stable inversion layer trapped moisture near the ground. Conclusion: Different synoptic patterns correspond to distinct dominant physical mechanisms. For the reflux type, forecasters should focus on the persistence of easterly winds; for the warm sector type, the intensity of the southwest jet is key; for the static type, the focus should be on inversion strength.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
廖廓. 福建沿海一次典型平流海雾生消过程分析[C]//中国环境科学学会. 中国环境科学学会2022年科学技术年会论文集(一). 福州: 福建省气象科学研究所, 2022: 301-307.
|
|
[2]
|
黄惠镕, 韩美, 潘宁, 等. 福建一次春季海雾的边界层特征及其成因分析[J]. 海峡科学, 2019(3): 12-15+25.
|
|
[3]
|
郑凤琴, 周绍毅, 韦晶晶, 等. 北部湾海雾特点及海陆大雾差异分析[J]. 气象科技, 2020, 48(5): 717-722.
|
|
[4]
|
梁军, 冯呈呈, 王磊, 等. 黄海北部海域春季一次平流雾特征分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(3): 448-456.
|
|
[5]
|
Fu, G., Zhang, S.P., Gao, S.H., et al. (2012) Understanding of Sea Fog over the China Seas. China Meteorological Press.
|
|
[6]
|
Li, Y. and Zheng, Y. (2015) Analysis of Atmospheric Turbulence in the Upper Layers of Sea Fog. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 33, 809-818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
连帆, 万超, 孙倩倩. 2018年春、夏季黄海北部海雾生消异同分析[J]. 山地气象学报, 2025, 49(2): 97-104.
|
|
[8]
|
朱智慧, 郑运霞, 刘飞, 等. 上海沿海海雾分类及其时空特征分析[J]. 气象, 2024, 50(12): 1509-1518.
|
|
[9]
|
王博妮, 张雪蓉, 濮梅娟, 等. 一次平流雾的形成和传播特征研究[J]. 气象, 2019, 45(3): 395-406.
|
|
[10]
|
于亚杰, 李卫国, 王兴坤, 等. 京津冀大气加权平均温度的时空异质性建模及气象因子耦合分析[J]. 测绘通报, 2025(12): 126-133.
|