基于深度学习的四川省洪涝灾害损失预测模型
Deep Learning-Based Prediction Model for Flood Disaster Loss in Sichuan Province
摘要: 现有数据驱动的洪涝灾害损失模型普遍存在模型透明度不足和物理可解释性有限的问题,洪涝灾害损失指标与气象因子均表现出明显的时间序列特性。本文提出一种融合注意力机制–卷积神经网络(CNN)-长短期记忆网络(LSTM)的深度学习预测模型,用于四川省洪涝灾害损失预测。模型首先利用CNN提取多源气象因子及灾损序列的局部动态特征,再通过LSTM捕捉长期时序依赖关系,并引入注意力机制增强关键特征的贡献度,从而提高模型对非线性、非平稳灾损序列的刻画能力。基于1950~2020年四川省气象与灾损数据进行验证,结果表明在使用筛选出的9个强相关影响因子时,该模型在经济损失比与人口损失比上的平均MAPE相比单LSTM模型降低约10.5%,相比SVM模型降低约21.2%,预测精度显著提升。
Abstract: Existing data-driven flood loss prediction models often suffer from limited transparency and insufficient physical interpretability. Flood-related damage indicators and meteorological factors exhibit strong temporal patterns. To address these issues, this study proposes a deep learning model that integrates an attention mechanism, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for predicting flood losses in Sichuan Province. The CNN module extracts multidimensional dynamic features from meteorological factors and disaster loss sequences, and the LSTM component captures long-term temporal dependencies, while the attention mechanism further enhances informative features by adaptively learning their importance. Experiments using meteorological and disaster data from 1950 to 2020 show that, when using nine strongly correlated meteorological predictors, the proposed model reduces the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of economic and population loss ratios by approximately 10.5% compared with the single-LSTM model and by about 21.2% compared with the SVM model, demonstrating significantly improved prediction performance.
文章引用:陈曜, 张杰, 黄伟军. 基于深度学习的四川省洪涝灾害损失预测模型[J]. 水资源研究, 2026, 15(2): 151-159. https://doi.org/10.12677/jwrr.2026.152018

参考文献

[1] ROZALIS, S., MORIN, E., YAIR, Y. and PRICE, C. Flash flood prediction using an uncalibrated hydrological model and radar rainfall data in a Mediterranean watershed under changing hydrological conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 394(1-2): 245-255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 刘自强. 黄河下游洪水灾害损失预估研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2005.
[3] 王腊春, 周寅康, 许有鹏, 付重林, 许定庆. 太湖流域洪涝灾害损失模拟及预测[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2000(1): 33-39.
[4] AHMAD, N., HUSSAIN, M., RIAZ, N., SUBHANI, F., HAIDER, S., ALAMGIR, K. S. and SHINWARI, F. Flood prediction and disaster risk analysis using GIS based wireless sensor networks, a review. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2013, 3(8): 632-643.
[5] 李谢辉, 韩荟芬. 河南省黄河中下游地区洪灾损失评估与预测[J]. 灾害学, 2014, 29(1): 87-92.
[6] 王平, 黄河, 吴玮. 基于支持向量机的湖北省洪涝农业损失预测模型[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(18): 4437-4440.
[7] 龚艳冰, 向林, 刘高峰. 基于高斯过程回归模型的洪涝灾害损失预测研究——以重庆市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(6): 1502-1510.
[8] 吉中会, 李宁, 吴吉东, 等. 区域洪涝灾害损失评估及预测的CART模型研究——以湖南省为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2012, 31(6): 106-110+144.
[9] 喻寅昀, 田云, 王昶, 许可. 洪水灾害经济损失的预测研究[J]. 沈阳理工大学学报, 2016, 35(2): 85-89.
[10] 陈民瑞, 黄伟军. 影响四川省洪灾损失的气象因子分析[J]. 东北水利水电, 2022, 40(12): 46-50.
[11] SIMONYAN, K., ZISSERMAN, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. 2014.
[12] Nair, V., Hinton, G. E. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, Inc., 2010: 807-814.
[13] HOCHREITER, S., SCHMIDHUBER, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8): 1735-1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] GREFF, K., SRIVASTAVA, R. K., KOUTNÍK, J., STEUNEBRINK, B. R. and SCHMIDHUBER, J. LSTM: A search space odyssey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2016, 28(10): 2222-2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] NIU, Z., ZHONG, G. and YU, H. A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning. Neurocomputing, 2021, 452: 48-62.[CrossRef
[16] NOBLE, W. S. What is a support vector machine? Nature Biotechnology, 2006, 24(12): 1565-1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] ZHANG, Z., LI, M., LIN, X., WANG, Y. and HE, F. Multistep speed prediction on traffic networks: A deep learning approach considering spatio-temporal dependencies. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 105: 297-322.[CrossRef