多重视角下高校辅导员胜任力的模型建构与层级差异——基于一所中外合办高校的质性分析
Model Construction and Hierarchical Differences of University Counselors’ Competencies from Multiple Perspectives—A Qualitative Analysis Based on a Chinese-Foreign Cooperative University
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.164222, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 解启健, 吴宁宁, 江茂欣:西交利物浦大学学生事务办公室,江苏 苏州
关键词: 高校辅导员胜任力中外合办高校不同层级College Counselors Competency Chinese-Foreign Cooperative University Multiple Perspectives
摘要: 本研究基于扎根理论,以一所中外合办高校为案例,通过对8名一线辅导员、3名院系管理者及2名部门管理者的深度访谈,旨在建构该特定情境下高校辅导员的胜任力模型,并探讨不同管理层级对该模型认知的差异。研究发现,该胜任力模型由“动态角色”、“工作素养”和“资源转化能动性”三个核心维度构成,三者之间形成“角色驱动–素养支撑–资源转化”的动态循环。研究进一步揭示了认知层级差异:一线辅导员更关注工作素养中的应急能力与情绪管理;院系管理者关注沟通协调能力与持续发展能力;而部门管理者则更关注动态角色中的陪伴与价值引导。该研究为中外合办高校辅导员的胜任力模型提供了补充,并对其分层培养和专业发展提出了实践参考。
Abstract: Grounded in grounded theory, this study takes a Chinese-Foreign cooperative university as a case example and conducts in-depth interviews with eight frontline counselors, three college-level administrators, and two departmental administrators. It aims to construct a competency model for university counselors in this specific context and to explore the differences in perceptions of this model across different administrative levels. The findings reveal that the competency model consists of three core dimensions: “dynamic role”, “work literacy”, and “resource transformation agency”, which together form a dynamic cycle of “role-driven-literacy-supported-resource transformation”. The study further uncovers hierarchical differences in perception: frontline counselors focus more on emergency response capabilities and emotion management within work literacy; college-level administrators emphasize communication and coordination skills as well as continuous development ability; while departmental administrators pay greater attention to companionship and value guidance embedded in the dynamic role dimension. This research enriches the competency model for counselors in Chinese-Foreign cooperative universities and offers practical implications for their tiered training and professional development.
文章引用:解启健, 吴宁宁, 江茂欣 (2026). 多重视角下高校辅导员胜任力的模型建构与层级差异——基于一所中外合办高校的质性分析. 心理学进展, 16(4), 486-496. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.164222

参考文献

[1] 和倩倩, 邓颖, 谢莹(2025). 中外合作办学模式下高校辅导员面临的挑战与思考. 湖北开放职业学院学报, 38(9), 46-48.
[2] 刘佳(2025). 中外合作办学高校辅导员胜任力提升策略研究. 教育研究与实践, 43(2), 22-26.
[3] 马玉, 谢菊兰, 马红宇, 张秀平(2017). 高校辅导员的边界分割偏好与工作-非工作冲突: 边界分割管理策略的调节作用. 心理科学, 40(1), 153-159.
[4] 彭庆红(2006). 高校辅导员素质结构模型的构建. 清华大学教育研究, 27(3), 90-94.
[5] 孙莉玲, 江莉莉(2016). 高校辅导员胜任力模型建构——基于“高校辅导员年度人物”事迹的数据分析. 高校辅导员, 7(6), 24-28.
[6] 唐玉兔, 丁杰(2024). 中外合作办学高校辅导员队伍建设分析. 产业与科技论坛, 23(11), 255-257.
[7] 王重光, 肖双双(2022). 高校辅导员岗位胜任力模型的构建及实施路径——基于学生立场的实证调查. 江汉大学学报(社会科学版), 39(6), 112-124+128.
[8] 杨继平, 顾倩(2004). 大学辅导员胜任力的初步研究. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 27(6), 56-58.
[9] 杨雪, 宋佳殷(2025). 家庭教养方式、亲子关系与青少年社会心理发展. 人口学刊, 47(1), 78-93.
[10] 叶茂源, 魏论研(2025). 家校协同育人的探索与思考. 高校辅导员, (1), 58-61.
[11] 张凤(2009). 高校辅导员胜任力模型初探. 思想教育研究, 25(1), 82-85.
[12] 张宏亮, 柯柏玲, 戴湘竹(2020). 基于卡方检验法的高校辅导员职业倦怠影响因素分析及对策. 思想政治教育研究, 36(3), 147-151.
[13] 张敏(2024). 高校辅导员共情疲劳发生机制: 心理弹性的调节与中介作用. 高校辅导员学刊, 16(6), 7-13.
[14] 郑勇军, 陈浩彬(2021). 高校辅导员胜任力结构模型研究. 心理学探新, 41(2), 169-175.
[15] Adams, J. S. (1976). The Structure and Dynamics of Behavior in Organizational Boundary Roles. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1175-1199). Rand McNally.
[16] De Vos, A., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Akkermans, J. (2020). Sustainable Careers: Towards a Conceptual Model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, Article 103196.[CrossRef
[17] Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.[CrossRef
[18] Hobfoll, S.E. (1989). Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524.[CrossRef
[19] Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations. Wiley.
[20] Luthar, S. S., & Latendresse, S. J. (2005). Children of the Affluent: Challenges to Well-Being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 49-53.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for Competence Rather Than for “Intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Nellen, L. C., Gijselaers, W. H., & Grohnert, T. (2020). A Meta-Analytic Literature Review on Organization-Level Drivers of Team Learning. Human Resource Development Review, 19, 152-182.[CrossRef
[23] Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. Wiley.
[24] Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford University Press.
[25] Williams, P., Gage, H., Jones, B., Aspden, C., Smylie, J., Bird, T. et al. (2025). Team Climate, Job Satisfaction, Burnout and Practice Performance: Results of a National Survey of Staff in General Practices in England. BMC Primary Care, 26, Article No. 173.[CrossRef] [PubMed]