基于两步波动率的量化投资策略
Quantitative Investment Strategy Based on Two-Step Volatility
摘要: 本次研究从波动率具有长短期成分的经济学直觉出发,将市场波动视为“稳态–偏离–回归”的动态过程,采用长期视角对波动率趋势进行常态化分析,并通过短期视角捕捉波动率对稳态的暂时性偏离,进而为投资者提供详细的决策指引。在方法上,本研究与Component GARCH、HAR-RV等多成分波动率模型在思想上有共通之处,但更强调通过EWMA与GARCH的分立结构生成连续交易信号,服务于策略执行而非仅提升预测精度。具体而言,EWMA模型用于拟合波动率变化趋势,作为判断市场波动处于“均衡水平”的动态标准;GARCH模型用于滚动样本外预测,精准获得短期波动状态。通过计算短期预测与长期基准的相对偏离度,构建连续的波动率状态识别信号。以沪深300ETF期权为样本,设置清晰交易机制并选择两个基准策略进行对比,实证结果表明,本文基于两步波动率构建的策略在累计收益、夏普比率、最大回撤等核心绩效指标上均呈现较强优越性。
Abstract: This study begins with the economic intuition that volatility consists of long- and short-term components, viewing market volatility as a dynamic process of “steady state-deviation-reversion.” It adopts a long-term perspective for routine analysis of volatility trends while capturing temporary deviations from the steady state through a short-term lens, thereby providing investors with detailed decision-making guidance. Methodologically, while this study shares conceptual common ground with multi-component volatility models such as Component GARCH and HAR-RV, it places greater emphasis on generating continuous trading signals through a decoupled structure combining EWMA and GARCH, serving strategy execution rather than merely improving predictive accuracy. Specifically, the EWMA model is used to fit the trend in volatility, serving as a dynamic benchmark for determining whether market volatility is at an “equilibrium level”; the GARCH model is applied for rolling out-of-sample forecasts to precisely capture short-term volatility dynamics. By calculating the relative deviation between short-term forecasts and the long-term benchmark, a continuous signal for identifying volatility states is constructed. Using CSI 300ETF options as the sample, a clear trading mechanism is established, and two representative benchmark strategies are selected for comparison. Empirical results demonstrate that the strategy constructed on the basis of the two-step volatility approach exhibits strong superiority across key performance metrics such as cumulative return, Sharpe ratio, and maximum drawdown.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987-1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Andersen, T.G. and Bollerslev, T. (1998) Deutsche Mark-Dollar Volatility: Intraday Activity Patterns, Macroeconomic Announcements, and Longer Run Dependencies. The Journal of Finance, 53, 219-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
魏宇. 沪深300股指期货的波动率预测模型研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(2): 66-76.
|
|
[5]
|
Hull, J. (2021) Options, Futures and Other Derivatives: Global Edition. Pearson Education Limited.
|
|
[6]
|
马天平, 吴卫星. 基于机器学习算法的金融期权波动率预测[J]. 学海, 2018(5): 201-209.
|
|
[7]
|
蒋笑阳, 谢江宇, 颜廷正, 等. 基于GARCH模型和机器学习的波动率预测与期权定价研究[J]. 征信, 2025, 43(9): 77-92.
|
|
[8]
|
王苏生, 李光路, 王俊博. 基于损失函数的GARCH类模型波动率预测评价[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, 32(9): 101-106.
|