适老化无障碍环境建设检察公益诉讼的适用困境与完善建议
The Application Dilemma and Improvement Suggestions of Public Interest Litigation in the Construction of Elderly-Friendly and Barrier-Free Environments by the Procuratorate
摘要: 随着我国人口老龄化进程加速,适老化无障碍环境建设已成为落实与应对老龄化战略的关键举措。2023年《中华人民共和国无障碍环境建设法》的实施,正式确立了该领域的检察公益诉讼制度,加强对该领域的监督制约。然而,作为一项新兴制度,其在实践中面临多重困境。因此,笔者通过对典型实践案例分析,系统检视了当前适用中的核心问题。在制度层面,检察机关的监督权受限。在程序层面,诉前程序的标准认定模糊,民事与行政公益诉讼的适用顺位不清。在规则层面,行政诉讼的证明责任分配不当。为解决上述困境,笔者从完善检察行政监督制度、优化诉前程序机制、厘清诉讼类型顺位、明晰举证责任分配等方面提出完善建议,旨在推动适老化无障碍环境建设检察公益诉讼更加有序发展,切实保障老年人等弱势群体的合法权益,促进社会公平正义与文明进步。
Abstract: With the accelerating process of population aging in our country, the construction of an aging-friendly and barrier-free environment has become a key measure to implement and respond to the aging strategy. The implementation of the “Law on the Construction of Barrier-Free Environments” in 2023 officially established the public interest litigation system in this field, strengthening supervision and restraint. However, as a new system, it faces multiple challenges in practice. Therefore, through the analysis of typical practical cases, the author systematically examines the core issues in current application. At the institutional level, the supervisory power of the procuratorial organs is limited. At the procedural level, the standards for pre-litigation procedures are ambiguous, and the application sequence of civil and administrative public interest litigation is unclear. At the rule level, the allocation of the burden of proof in administrative litigation is inappropriate. To address these challenges, the author proposes improvement suggestions from aspects such as perfecting the procuratorial administrative supervision system, optimizing the pre-litigation procedure mechanism, clarifying the sequence of litigation types, and clarifying the allocation of the burden of proof, aiming to promote the more orderly development of public interest litigation for the construction of accessible and barrier-free environments for the elderly, effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly and other vulnerable groups, and promote social fairness, justice, and civilization.
文章引用:吴双扬. 适老化无障碍环境建设检察公益诉讼的适用困境与完善建议[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(4): 639-644. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.134203

参考文献

[1] 周学馨, 吴波, 朱文艳. 中国积极应对人口老龄化制度: 理论基础、演进历程及战略启示[J]. 人口研究, 2026, 50(1): 104-120.
[2] 邱景辉. 无障碍环境建设法检察公益诉讼条款的理解与适用[J]. 人民检察, 2023(17): 32-36.
[3] 董储超. 无障碍环境建设行政公益诉讼的理论逻辑与优化进路[J]. 残疾人研究, 2024(1): 67-77.
[4] 郭儒鹏. 积极老龄化视角下老年数字鸿沟的成因探寻与弥合路径研究[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2024(8): 134-146.
[5] 杨雅妮. 无障碍环境建设公益诉讼制度的反思与优化[J]. 残疾人研究, 2024(1): 55-66.
[6] 张相军, 马睿. 检察机关开展行政违法行为监督的理论与实践[J]. 发现评论, 2023, 41(6): 14-25.
[7] 郑静雅, 张迎滨. 无障碍环境建设领域行政公益诉讼相关问题探析[J]. 人民检察官, 2021(22): 62-64.
[8] 吕世明. 以检察公益诉讼推动无障碍环境建设[J]. 人民论坛, 2021(13): 6-9.
[9] 母光栋. 论检察公益诉讼法的基本原则[J]. 行政法学研究, 2025(2): 155-166.
[10] 刘加良, 李畅. 行政公益诉讼前检察建议的规则调试[J]. 河北法学, 2023, 41(11): 59-77.
[11] 刘斌, 杨翠霞, 田涛. 老龄化无障碍研究进展及其对适老化环境建设的启示[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2021, 41(20): 4569-4574.
[12] 林莉红. 检察机关提起民事公益诉讼之制度空间再探: 兼与行政公益诉讼范围比较[J]. 行政法学研究, 2022(2): 77-92.