项目式学习对中学生英语核心素养非语言维度影响的实证研究述评
An Empirical Research Review on the Impact of Project-Based Learning on Non-Language Dimensions of Secondary School Students’ English Core Competencies
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.164817, PDF,   
作者: 胡 晓*:重庆三峡科技大学外国语学院,重庆;冯 姗:重庆市万州第二高级中学,重庆
关键词: 项目式学习英语核心素养批判性思维合作能力实证研究Project-Based Learning English Core Competencies Critical Thinking Collaboration Skills Empirical Research
摘要: 本研究通过系统性文献综述整合2008~2024年35篇实证研究,探讨项目式学习(PBL)对中学生英语核心素养非语言维度(批判性思维、合作能力)的影响。多数高质量研究表明PBL通过驱动性问题与真实性任务激活认知链,对批判性思维具有显著的积极影响(效应量d值范围0.43至1.02,不同研究间存在较大差异),合作能力呈现特定教育情境下的复杂特征,例如在中国重点中学的PBL实践中,学生分工执行效率较高,但在协商意愿上可能受到课堂竞争环境的影响,呈现出与强调开放式协商的多元文化情境不同的特点,其效能受任务真实性、教师引导及学生语言水平制约,实施中面临课时冲突、师生适应障碍及资源壁垒等挑战,“微项目链”“分层角色制”等本土化策略可有效提升成效;研究指出现有样本偏差、素养覆盖不均衡及教师视角缺失等局限,未来需构建适配中国教育生态的PBL模型,加强长周期追踪与技术赋能,推动语言能力与非语言素养协同发展,为中学英语素养培育提供实证参照。
Abstract: This study employs a systematic literature review to synthesize 35 empirical studies published between 2008 and 2024, exploring the effects of project-based learning (PBL) on the non-language dimensions (critical thinking and collaboration skills) of secondary school students’ English core competencies. Most high-quality studies indicate that PBL activates cognitive chains through driving questions and authentic tasks, exerting a significant positive effect on critical thinking (effect sizes ranged from 0.43 to 1.02, with considerable variation across studies). Collaboration skills exhibit complex characteristics shaped by specific educational contexts. For instance, in PBL practices in key Chinese secondary schools, students demonstrate high efficiency in task division, but their willingness to engage in negotiation may be influenced by competitive classroom environments, presenting patterns distinct from multicultural contexts that emphasize open negotiation. The effectiveness of PBL is constrained by factors such as task authenticity, teacher guidance, and students’ language proficiency. Implementation challenges include time constraints, adaptation difficulties for both teachers and students, and resource barriers. Localized strategies such as “micro-project chains” and “stratified role systems” have been shown to effectively enhance outcomes. The review identifies limitations in existing research, including sample bias, uneven coverage of competencies, and a lack of teacher perspectives. Future research should focus on developing PBL models suited to China’s educational context, strengthening long-term longitudinal studies, leveraging technology, and promoting the coordinated development of language proficiency and non-language competencies, thereby providing empirical references for cultivating English competencies in secondary education.
文章引用:胡晓, 冯姗. 项目式学习对中学生英语核心素养非语言维度影响的实证研究述评[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(4): 1602-1614. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.164817

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版2020年修订) [M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
[2] Thomas, J.W. (2000) A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. Autodesk Foundation.
[3] Helle, L., Tynjälä, P. and Olkinuora, E. (2006) Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education—Theory, Practice and Rubber Sling Shots. Higher Education, 51, 287-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Beckett, G.H. and Slater, T. (2018) Global Perspectives on Project-Based Language Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: Key Approaches, Technology Tools, and Frameworks. Routledge.
[5] 李晓楠. 近十年国内项目式学习研究综述——基于CSSCI期刊文献的可视化分析. 中国远程教育, 2021(4): 56-64.
[6] Krajcik, J.S. and Shin, N. (2014) Project-Based Learning. In: Sawyer, R.K., Ed., The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, 275-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Facione, P.A. (1990) Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The California Academic Press.
[8] Halpern, D.F. (2014) Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. 5th Edition, Psychology Press.
[9] Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (2009) An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365-379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] OECD (2017) Collaborative Problem Solving: Framework and Assessment for 2030. PISA.
[11] Arksey, H. and O’Malley, L. (2005) Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., et al. (2009) The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLOS Medicine, 6, e1000100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Plonsky, L. and Oswald, F.L. (2017) Multiple Regression as a Flexible Alternative to Anova in L2 Research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 579-592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Thomas, J. and Harden, A. (2008) Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article No. 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Guetterman, T.C., Fetters, M.D. and Creswell, J.W. (2015) Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research through Joint Displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13, 554-561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hong, Q.N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Vedel, I., et al. (2018) Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018. McGill University.
[17] Watson, G. and Glaser, E.M. (2010) Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Pearson.
[18] 张虹. 近十年国内项目式学习研究综述——基于CSSCI期刊文献的可视化分析[J]. 中国远程教育, 2021(4): 56-64.
[19] Beckett, G.H. (2019) Critical Thinking Development through Community-Based Projects. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 412-430.
[20] 李晓楠. 中学英语PBL提升批判性思维的准实验研究[J]. 外语教学, 2022, 43(1): 56-62.
[21] 王蕾. 文化比较类PBL项目中的批判性思维发展路径[J]. 基础教育外语教学研究, 2021(4): 29-34.
[22] 陈帆, 王琳, 周涛. 项目式学习对高中生英语议论文思辨能力的长期效应研究[J]. 外语界, 2020, 42(3): 67-75.
[23] Kim, Y. and Lee, H. (2021) Cultural Influences on Critical Thinking in EFL PBL. ELT Journal, 75, 312-325.
[24] 刘洋. 食品安全议题英语PBL中的证据整合能力培养[J]. 中小学外语教学, 2023, 46(3): 12-18.
[25] 张明. 批判性质疑的文化壁垒: 上海中学生英语项目中的实证观察[J]. 全球教育展望, 2022, 51(8): 112-120.
[26] 黄静. 乡镇中学英语PBL中的批判性思维培养困境及对策[J]. 中小学英语教学与研究, 2021(5): 45-49.
[27] 李芳. 低水平EFL学习者的批判性思维脚手架设计——基于PBL的实证探索[J]. 现代外语, 2020, 43(2): 245-256.
[28] 张虹. 中学英语PBL中批判性思维培养的真实性问题设计研究[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2022(3): 45-53.
[29] 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2018.
[30] 李芳, 王蔷, 张伟. 中学英语PBL项目的教师实施信念调查[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2020, 52(4): 603-615.
[31] 文秋芳. 中国英语学习策略实证研究20年: 回顾与展望[J]. 外语界, 2018(6): 2-11.
[32] Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef