单向的意思联络：片面帮助犯的证成与边界

One-Way Mental Connection: The Justification and Boundaries of One-Sided Aiding

摘要: 关于片面帮助犯主要存在肯定说，否定说两种主张。持否定说的学者认为，片面帮助犯与我国共同犯罪的法条中“共同故意”相悖，并在学界存在共同意思主体说，行为共同否定说以及单方危害故意性说等理论学说。持肯定说的学者则有单方面内心存在说，双重因果关系说以及主客观统一等理论支撑。从我国实际案情出发，虽然否定论的理论支撑比肯定论更丰富，但是显然否定论的合理性不足，即对帮助犯的惩罚会大大减小。因此应该采取片面帮助犯肯定论的观点。

Abstract: There are two kinds of opinions about the existence of one-sided aiding crime: affirmative and negative. The scholars who hold the negative theory believe that the one-sided aid to the criminal is contrary to the “common intention” in the law of our country, and there are theories such as the subject of common intention, the common negation of behavior and the unilateral harm of intention. The scholars who hold the positive theory have the theory of unilateral inner existence, the theory of double causality, the theory of subjective and objective unity. From the actual case in our country, although the theoretical support of the negative theory is richer than the positive theory, it is clear that the rationality of the negative theory is insufficient, that is, the punishment of the assisting crime will be greatly reduced. Therefore, we should adopt the viewpoint of one-sided positive conclusion of aiding the offender.