体育院校学生学习力评价量表的编制与检验

The Development and Validation of the Learning Ability Evaluation Scale for Students in Sports Colleges

摘要: 目的：为精准评估体育院校学生学习力水平，弥补该群体专用学习力测量工具的不足。方法：运用文献分析、数理统计法、访谈法等研究方法，构建了初始量表(含5个维度、34个题项)。再通过正式调研发放1428份有效问卷，随机分半用于探索性(EFA)与验证性因子分析(CFA)，编制普通高校体育教育专业学生学习力量表。结果：最终量表包含学习动力、学习毅力、学习方法、学习效率、学习转化力5个维度，共24个题项，“学习动力”维度突出体育专业目标(如资格证考取、职业规划)，“学习毅力”维度贴合“训练 + 学习”的双重压力场景，“学习方法”维度涵盖线上线下体育资源利用，“学习效率”与“学习转化力”维度分别强调技能掌握速度与实践教学的应用能力；随机对半进行探索性(EFA)与验证性因子分析(CFA)，均达理想标准，且与效标量表相关性显著。结论：结果表明该量表信效度良好，可作为体育院校学生学习力评估的有效工具。

Abstract: Objective: This paper aims to accurately assess the learning ability level of students in sports colleges and to make up for the deficiency of the specialized learning ability measurement tools for this group. Methods: By using literature analysis, mathematical statistics, and interview methods, an initial scale (including 5 dimensions and 34 items) was constructed. Then, 1428 valid questionnaires were distributed through formal surveys, and randomly divided into halves for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to develop the learning ability scale for students majoring in physical education in ordinary universities. Results: The final scale consists of 5 dimensions: learning motivation, learning perseverance, learning methods, learning efficiency, and learning transformation ability, with a total of 24 items. The dimension of “learning motivation” highlights the goals of sports majors (such as qualification certificate examination, career planning), the dimension of “learning perseverance” fits the dual pressure scenario of “training and learning”, the dimension of “learning method” covers the utilization of online and offline sports resources, and the dimension of “learning efficiency” and “learning transformation power” respectively emphasize the speed of skills and the application ability of practical teaching; Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted randomly in half, both reaching ideal standards, and showing significant correlation with the criterion scale. Conclusion: The results indicate that this scale has good reliability and validity and can be used as an effective tool for assessing the learning ability of students in sports colleges.