矿区废弃地土壤微生物特征及其影响因素:基于Meta分析的研究
Characteristics of Soil Microorganisms and Their Influencing Factors in Mine Wasteland: A Study Based on Meta Analysis
摘要: 土壤微生物在物质循环过程中对外界环境的改变比较敏感,是评价土壤质量的重要指标,这对矿区废弃地恢复的研究具有重大意义。为了探索矿区废弃地土壤微生物群落特征及其影响因素,我们使用Web of science和CNKI数据库系统进行数据收集,直至2021年1月13日,通过运用Meta分析的方法,共检索了2678篇文献,最后从24项研究中获得了2549个观测值的元数据集。研究结果表明:(1) 矿区开采后,土壤微生物种群和数量都发生了极大变化;(2) 煤矿区、锑矿区和铜矿区微生物物种较为丰富,相比铁矿区、锌矿区、菱镁矿区和稀土矿区更适于土壤微生物繁殖;(3) 研究中我们发现不同植被类型对土壤细菌丰度的影响表现为:灌木 > 乔草 > 乔木 > 草本 > 乔灌;(4) 随着矿区复垦年限的延长,矿区复垦后植被覆盖率提高,植物分泌物和枯枝落叶可能会影响到土壤养分水平,环境因子与菌群间合作增强,土壤环境的稳定性明显提高,细菌丰度显著上升。综上所述,矿区废弃地可以通过植被恢复改善土壤微生物群落特征,该研究结果对矿区恢复提供了一定的理论支撑。
Abstract: Soil microorganism is sensitive to the change of the external environment in the process of material circulation, and it is an important index to evaluate the soil quality, which is of great significance to the research on the restoration of mining wasteland. In order to explore the characteristics and driving factors of soil microbial community in mining wasteland, we used web of science and CNKI database system to collect data until January 13, 2021. A total of 2678 literatures were retrieved by using meta analysis method. In the last 24 studies, 2549 metadata sets of observation values were obtained. The results showed that: (1) the population and quantity of soil microorganism changed greatly after mining; (2) Compared with iron mine, zinc mine, magnesite mine and rare earth mine, coal mine, antimony mine and copper mine are more suitable for soil microbial reproduction; (3) In the study, we found that the effects of different vegetation types on soil bacterial abundance were as follows: Shrub > Joe grass > arbor > herb > Joe shrub; (4) With the extension of mining area reclamation years, the plant coverage increases after mining area reclamation, the flora secretion may affect the soil nutrient level, the cooperation between environmental factors and flora is enhanced, the stability of soil environment is significantly improved, and the bacterial abundance is significantly increased. In conclusion, the characteristics of soil microbial community can be improved by vegetation restoration in mining abandoned land, and the results of this study provide a certain theoretical support for mining restoration.
文章引用:赵艳妮, 肖亚旭, 黄富, 禹建梅, 杜杰明. 矿区废弃地土壤微生物特征及其影响因素:基于Meta分析的研究[J]. 土壤科学, 2026, 14(2): 113-124. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjss.2026.142012

参考文献

[1] 樊文华, 白中科, 李慧峰, 等. 不同复垦模式及复垦年限对土壤微生物的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(2): 330-336.
[2] 从怀军, 成毅, 安韶山, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复措施对土壤养分和微生物量C、N、P的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(4): 217-221.
[3] Ma, J., Lu, Y.Q., Chen, F., et al. (2020) Molecular Ecological Network Complexity Drives Stand Resilience of Soil Bacteria to Mining Disturbances among Typical Damaged Ecosystems in China. Microorganisms, 8, Article 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Luo, Z.B., Ma, J., Chen, F., et al. (2019) Cracks Reinforce the Interactions among Soil Bacterial Communities in the Coal Mining Area of Loess Plateau, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, Article 4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Jia, T., Yao, Y.S., Wang, R.H., et al. (2020) Dynamics Relationship of Phyllosphere and Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities during the Development of Bothriochloa Ischaemum in Copper Tailings. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, Article 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Deng, J.J., Bai, X.J., Zhou, Y.B., et al. (2020) Variations of Soil Microbial Communities Accompanied by Different Vegetation Restoration in an Open-Cut Iron Mining Area. Science of the Total Environment, 704, Article 135243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Guo, D.C., Fan, Z.Z., Lu, S.Y., et al. (2019) Changes in Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities during Remediation of Heavy Metal-Accumulating Plants around the Xikuangshan Mine in Southern China. Scientific Reports, 9, Article No. 1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Zhang, J., Yang, S.Y., Yang, H.F., et al. (2018) Comparative Study on Effects of Four Energy Plants Growth on Chemical Fractions of Heavy Metals and Activity of Soil Enzymes in Copper Mine Tailings. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 20, 616-623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 张蓉, 于亚军. 煤矸山复垦林地和草地土壤微生物多样性和群落组成的差异及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(6): 1662-1668.
[10] Mi, J.X., Hou, H.P., Raval, S., et al. (2020) Effect of Crop Cultivation on the Soil Carbon Stock in Mine Dumps of the Loess Plateau, China. Science of the Total Environment, 741, Article 139809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Hong, H., Si, Y.X., Xing, Y. and Li, Y. (2015) Illumina MiSeq Sequencing Investigation on the Contrasting Soil Bacterial Community Structures in Different Iron Mining Areas. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 10788-10799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Hou, X.L., Han, H., Tigabu, M., et al. (2019) Changes in Soil Physico-Chemical Properties Following Vegetation Restoration Mediate Bacterial Community Composition and Diversity in Changting, China. Ecological Engineering, 138, 171-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Luo, Y.F., Wu, Y.G., Wang, H., et al. (2018) Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity Responses to the Direct Revegetation of an Artisanal Zinc Smelting Slag after 5 Years. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 14773-14788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] 金立群, 李希来, 孙华方, 等. 不同恢复年限对高寒露天煤矿区渣山植被和土壤特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(1): 121-128.
[15] 于亚军, 王继萍. 不同复垦年限煤矸山土壤微生物群落和酶活性及其影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(4): 1120-1126.
[16] 陈来红, 乔光华, 董红丽, 等. 准格尔露天矿区复垦对土壤细菌多样性的影响研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(2): 11-125.
[17] 侯湖平, 王琛, 李金融, 等. 煤矸石充填不同复垦年限土壤细菌群落结构及其酶活性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(11): 4230-4240.
[18] 李启艳, 翁炳霖, 李宗勋, 等. 稀土矿废弃地植被恢复过程中土壤微生物演变[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(10): 4360-4368.
[19] Li, Y.Y., Wen, H.Y., Chen, L.Q., et al. (2014) Succession of Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity in Soil along a Chronosequence of Reclamation and Re-Vegetation on Coal Mine Spoils in China. PLOS ONE, 9, e115024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Li, J.J., Zhou, X.M., Yan, J.X., et al. (2015) Effects of Regenerating Vegetation on Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Structure in Reclaimed Soils on a Surface Coal Mine Site. Applied Soil Ecology, 87, 56-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Tong, J., Cao, M.W., Jing, J.H., et al. (2017) Endophytic Fungi and Soil Microbial Community Characteristics over Different Years of Phytoremediation in a Copper Tailings Dam of Shanxi, China. Science of the Total Environment, 574, 881-888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] 李春, 李云驹, 许建初, 等. 昆阳磷矿不同植被恢复模式对土壤理化性质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 植物分类与资源学报, 2014, 36(4): 514-522.
[23] Nakagawa, S., Noble, D.W.A., Senior, A.M. and Lagisz, M. (2017) Meta-Evaluation of Meta-Analysis: Ten Appraisal Questions for Biologists. BMC Biology, 15, Article No. 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] 卞正富, 于昊辰, 雷少刚, 等. 黄河流域煤炭资源开发战略研判与生态修复策略思考[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(5): 1378-1391.
[25] 李海东, 胡国长, 燕守广. 矿区生态修复目标与模式研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2022, 38(8): 963-971.
[26] 姚斌, 汪海珍, 徐建民, 等. 除草剂对水稻土微生物的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2004, 24(2): 349-354.
[27] 滕应, 黄昌勇, 骆永明, 等. 铅锌银尾矿区土壤微生物活性及其群落功能多样性研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2004, 41(1): 113-119.
[28] 高均海, 李树志, 郭友红, 等. 复垦方法对矿区土壤微生物的影响[J]. 矿山测量, 2010(1): 10-12.
[29] 刘爱民, 黄为一. 铜尾矿复垦后土壤微生物活性及其群落功能多样性研究[J]. 生态环境, 2005, 14(6): 876-879.
[30] Mounaouer, B., Nesrine, A. and Abdennaceur, H. (2014) Identification and Characterization of Heavy Metal-Resistant Bacteria Selected from Different Polluted Sources. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, 7037-7052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 滕应, 黄昌勇. 重金属污染土壤的微生物生态效应及其修复研究进展[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(1): 85-89.
[32] Buchanan, R.E. 伯杰细菌鉴定手册[M]. 第8版. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984.
[33] 马建军, 姚虹, 张树礼. 黄土高原区煤矿复垦地乔灌木根区土壤特性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(24): 13197-13199.
[34] 尚文勤, 朱利平, 孙庆业, 等. 自然生态恢复过程中尾矿废弃地土壤微生物变化[J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(2): 713-717.
[35] 岳辉, 毕银丽. 基于主成分分析的矿区微生物复垦生态效应评价[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(4): 113-117.
[36] Helingerová, M., Frouz, J. and Šantrůčková, H. (2010) Microbial Activity in Reclaimed and Unreclaimed Post-Mining Sites near Sokolov (Czech Republic). Ecological Engineering, 36, 768-776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] 夏北成, Zhou, J., Tiedje, J.M. 土壤细菌类克隆群落及其结构的生态学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(4): 514-578.