人工晶状体植入装置的发展
Development of Intraocular Lens Delivery Devices
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1651803, PDF,   
作者: 蒲 肃:暨南大学附属爱尔眼科医院,广东 广州;唐琼燕*:暨南大学附属爱尔眼科医院,广东 广州;长沙爱尔眼科医院,湖南 长沙
关键词: 人工晶状体植入装置白内障手术预装式植入系统自动化植入发展历程IOL Delivery Device Cataract Surgery Preloaded System Automated Delivery Development History
摘要: 人工晶状体(Intraocular Lens, IOL)植入是白内障手术治疗过程中的关键步骤,而现代IOL的植入过程依赖IOL植入装置这一器械。IOL植入装置从问世至今已有40余年,其演进与手术安全性与术后恢复有着重要影响。本文将IOL植入装置的发展划分为“早期原型、手动非预装式、手动预装式、自动化植入装置”四个阶段,以时间顺序综述了IOL植入装置的发展与演变过程。在此过程中,演化的目标从最初的减小手术切口逐步转向提升效率及术后切口恢复质量,最终尝试以自动式植入消除人为操作因素而实现标准化。尽管目前自动化系统仍面临着性价比不突出、IOL兼容性受限及生态可持续性等挑战,但若能克服,其未来应用空间仍将十分广阔。未来如能通过在植入装置中集成微型阻力传感器以实现推注阻力的实时反馈,并结合大量临床数据分析出并建立损伤最小的植入阻力曲线模型,以指导后续新型自动植入设备的推注动力与速率,手术安全性将有希望得到进一步的提升。
Abstract: The modern process of Intraocular Lens (IOL) implantation, which is a critical step in cataract surgery, relies on a surgical instrument called IOL delivery device. Spanning over forty years, the continuous evolution of IOL delivery devices has had a significant influence on surgical safety and the quality of postoperative visual recovery. This review retrospectively analyzes the development history of IOL delivery devices, categorizing them into four stages: Early Prototypes, Manual Non-preloaded Devices, Manual Preloaded Systems, and Automated Delivery Systems. Throughout this process, the focus of the design has shifted from minimizing surgical trauma of incisions to improving efficiency and quality of incision recovery, and finally aiming to eliminate the human factor and achieve standardization by implanting the IOL automatically. Although there are some challenges that automated systems are facing, such as the high costs, limited compatibility and ecological sustainability issues, their future application prospects remain broad if these obstacles are overcome. Looking forward, if real-time feedback of injection resistant force could be achieved by integrating micro-sensors into delivery system, combined with the analysis of large-scale clinical data to establish optimal resistance curve models for guiding the power and rate of next-generation automated systems, surgical safety is expected to be further reinforced.
文章引用:蒲肃, 唐琼燕. 人工晶状体植入装置的发展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 179-189. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1651803

参考文献

[1] Bartell, M.T. (1987) Apparatus and Method for Insertion of an Intra-Ocular Lens. US4681102A.
[2] Reading, V.M. (1984) Astigmatism Following Cataract Surgery. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 68, 97-104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Friedrich, M., Munro, D.J., Auffarth, G.U. and Khoramnia, R. (2024) Characterisation of Intraocular Lens Injectors. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 241, 905-916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Mayer, E., Cadman, D., Ewings, P., et al. (2003) A 10 Year Retrospective Survey of Cataract Surgery and Endophthalmitis in a Single Eye Unit: Injectable Lenses Lower the Incidence of Endophthalmitis. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 87, 867-869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Espiritu, C.R.G. and Bernardo, J.P. (2009) Incision Sizes at Different Stages of Phacoemulsification with Foldable Intraocular Lens Implantation. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 35, 2115-2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Cabeza-Gil, I., Ríos-Ruiz, I. and Calvo, B. (2021) Experimental Evaluation of the Injection Force Exerted in Intraocular Lens Delivery with Syringe-Type Injectors. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 124, Article 104793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Zhang, L., Schickhardt, S., Merz, P. and Auffarth, G.U. (2024) Evaluation of Parameters and Nozzle Tip Damage after Clinical Use of Three Hydrophilic Intraocular Lens Injector Models. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2024, Article ID: 2360368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Zhang, L., Schickhardt, S., Merz, P. and Auffarth, G. (2023) Nozzle Tip Damage in Three Generations of Intraocular Lens Injector Models: An Experimental Laboratory Study. BMC Ophthalmology, 23, Article No. 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Fang, H., Zhang, L., Schickhardt, S., Merz, P.R., Yan, W., Leroux, M., et al. (2022) A Laboratory Evaluation of Nozzle Tip Damage in Four Generations of Intraocular Lens Injector Systems Using a Self-Developed Damage Scale. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Mencucci, R., Favuzza, E., Salvatici, M.C., Spadea, L. and Allen, D. (2018) Corneal Incision Architecture after IOL Implantation with Three Different Injectors: An Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy Study. International Ophthalmology, 39, 397-403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Matsuura, K. and Inoue, Y. (2014) Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device Backflow into Cartridge during Intraocular Lens Insertion Using Injectors. Clinical Ophthalmology, 8, 321-325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Tervo, T., Ljungberg, P., Kautiainen, T., Puska, P., Lehto, I., Raivio, I., et al. (1999) Prospective Evaluation of External Ocularmicrobial Growth and Aqueous Humor Contamination during Cataract Surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 25, 65-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] John, T., Sims, M. and Hoffmann, C. (2000) Intraocular Bacterial Contamination during Sutureless, Small Incision, Single-Port Phacoemulsification. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 26, 1786-1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Suzuki, T., Wada, T., Kozai, S., Ike, Y., Gilmore, M.S. and Ohashi, Y. (2008) Contribution of Secreted Proteases to the Pathogenesis of Postoperative Enterococcus Faecalis Endophthalmitis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 34, 1776-1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Nanavaty, M.A. and Kubrak-Kisza, M. (2017) Evaluation of Preloaded Intraocular Lens Injection Systems: Ex Vivo Study. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 43, 558-563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Harsum, S., Mann, S., Clatworthy, I., Lewin, J. and Little, B. (2009) An Investigation of Intraocular Lens Damage and Foreign Bodies Using an Injectable Hydrophilic Acrylic Lens Implant. Eye, 24, 152-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Kleinmann, G., Marcovich, A.L., Apple, D.J., et al. (2005) Linear Deposits on the Surfaces of Intraocular Lenses Implanted through a Hexagonal Cartridge Which Mimic Scratches/cracks on the Lenses. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 89, 1474-1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Marcovich, A.L., Kleinmann, G., Epstein, D., et al. (2006) The Course of Surface Deposits on a Hydrophilic Acrylic Intraocular Lens after Implantation through a Hexagonal Cartridge. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 90, 1249-1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Danese, C., El Jabali, A. and Lanzetta, P. (2022) Single-Hand Preloaded Intraocular Lens Implantation through a Screw-Type Single Use Injector. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 32, 3113-3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Khoramnia, R., Yildirim, T.M., Weindler, J., Naujokaitis, T., Dzhambazova, M. and Auffarth, G.U. (2021) Preloaded Injectors Used in a Clinical Study: Videographic Assessment and Laboratory Analysis of Injector Nozzle Damage. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 47, 1338-1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Song, X., Zhou, J., Zhang, G., Jia, S., Yuan, J., Hu, K., et al. (2023) The Impact of Preloaded Intraocular Lens Implantation System (TECNIS Itec®) in Routine Cataract Surgery in China: A Time-Motion Analysis. BMC Ophthalmology, 23, Article No. 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Mendicute, J., Bascaran, L., Pablo, L., Schweitzer, C., Velasque, L., Bouchet, C., et al. (2021) Multicenter Evaluation of Time, Operational, and Economic Efficiencies of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System versus Manual Intraocular Lens Delivery. Clinical Ophthalmology, 15, 591-599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Wu, Y., Yan, H. and Yan, W. (2020) Preloaded vs Manually Loaded IOL Delivery Systems in Cataract Surgery in the Largest Ambulatory Surgery Center of Northwestern China: An Efficiency Analysis. BMC Ophthalmology, 20, Article No. 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Cennamo, M., Favuzza, E., Salvatici, M.C., Giuranno, G., Buzzi, M. and Mencucci, R. (2020) Effect of Manual, Preloaded, and Automated Preloaded Injectors on Corneal Incision Architecture after IOL Implantation. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 46, 1374-1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Wang, L., Wolfe, P., Chernosky, A., Paliwal, S., Tjia, K. and Lane, S. (2016) In Vitro Delivery Performance Assessment of a New Preloaded Intraocular Lens Delivery System. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 42, 1814-1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Zhang, L., Auffarth, G., Schickhardt, S., Merz, P. and Tandogan, T. (2023) Evaluation of Nozzle Tip Damage in Intraocular Lens Injectors with V-Shaped Notch. Ophthalmic Research, 66, 1104-1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Zhang, L., Schickhardt, S., Fang, H., Auerbach, F., Cagampang, P., Merz, P.R., et al. (2022) Comparison of a New IOL Injector System against 3 Standard IOL Injector Systems with Different Incision Sizes: Miyake-Apple View Experimental Laboratory Study. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 48, 230-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Ouchi, M. (2012) Effect of Intraocular Lens Insertion Speed on Surgical Wound Structure. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 38, 1771-1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Allen, D., Habib, M. and Steel, D. (2012) Final Incision Size after Implantation of a Hydrophobic Acrylic Aspheric Intraocular Lens: New Motorized Injector versus Standard Manual Injector. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 38, 249-255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Pham Lagler, C.N., Munir, W.M. and Rowe, S.G. (2013) Intraocular Lens Insertion Speed and Structural Changes in Lens and Cartridge System. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 39, Article 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Khokhar, S., Sharma, R., Patil, B., Aron, N. and Gupta, S. (2014) Comparison of New Motorized Injector vs Manual Injector for Implantation of Foldable Intraocular Lenses on Wound Integrity: An ASOCT Study. Eye, 28, 1174-1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Mastropasqua, L., Toto, L., D’Ugo, E., Lanzini, M., Mattei, P.A., Falconio, G., et al. (2019) In Vivo and in Vitro Results of an Automated Preloaded Delivery System for IOL Implantation in Cataract Surgery. International Ophthalmology, 40, 125-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Kim, H.K., Seo, K.Y., Yoon, K.C., Choi, C.Y., Chung, T., Hyon, J.Y., et al. (2023) Clinical Evaluation of a Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens Using a Preloaded Automated Injector in a Korean Population. Clinical Ophthalmology, 17, 3353-3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Liu, J., Wolfe, P., Hernandez, V. and Kohnen, T. (2020) Comparative Assessment of the Corneal Incision Enlargement of 4 Preloaded IOL Delivery Systems. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 46, 1041-1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Yildirim, T.M., Łabuz, G., Baur, I.D., Poompokawat, P., Knorz, M.C., Auffarth, G.U., et al. (2021) Corneal Incision Enlargement in Two Preloaded Intraocular Lens Injectors: An Intraindividual in Vivo Study. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 37, 331-336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Joshi, R.S. (2022) Comparative Evaluation of an Automated Preloaded Delivery System with a Non-Preloaded System. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 70, 4307-4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Keyser, A., Chang, D.F., Thiel, C. and Hovanesian, J. (2024) Analysis of Intraocular Lens Packaging Weight and Waste. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 50, 1270-1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Stern, B., Gatinel, D., Nicolaos, G. and Grise-Dulac, A. (2025) Intraocular Lens Models: Ecological Distribution Footprint and Usage Trends at a Large Ophthalmology Centre. Eye, 39, 2260-2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]