伴有腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的IIIC2期宫颈癌 病例——影像学评估与个体化治疗的挑战与启示
Case of Stage IIIC2 Cervical Cancer with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis —Challenges and Insights in Imaging Evaluation and Individualized Treatment
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1651827, PDF,   
作者: 时 航:青岛大学第四临床学院,山东 青岛;温妙伟:山东第二医科大学临床医学院,山东 潍坊;周 方, 宋轶鹏*:烟台毓璜顶医院放疗科,山东 烟台
关键词: 宫颈癌个性化治疗淋巴结阳性Cervical Cancer Personalized Treatment Positive Lymph Node
摘要: 宫颈癌作为一种常见的恶性肿瘤,其发病率和死亡率在全球范围内持续上升,尤其在中低收入国家尤为显著。本文报告了一例IIIC2期宫颈癌患者的个体化治疗过程,强调了精准分期和个体化治疗在改善患者预后中的重要性。该患者为低分化鳞状细胞癌,侵及深肌层(>2/3肌壁),存在神经侵犯及脉管内癌栓,Ki-67标记指数高达80%,显示出侵袭性生物学行为。影像学评估在淋巴结转移的判断中存在局限,术前MRI未能准确反映腹主动脉旁淋巴结的情况,导致临床和病理分期不一致。为应对这一挑战,本文探讨了多模态影像学联合评估的重要性,以提高诊断的准确性。同时,强调了同步放化疗和巩固化疗在高风险患者中的应用,指出免疫治疗在晚期宫颈癌中的潜在价值。通过综合考虑患者的生物学特征和整体健康状态,制定个体化治疗策略,有望提升治疗效果和生存率。虽然本研究为个案报道且随访时间有限,但该病例的分析为今后临床实践提供了新的思路和依据,强调了对宫颈癌早期诊断与个体化治疗策略的持续研究的重要性。后续需在更大规模的患者群体中验证结论,以进一步优化IIIC2期宫颈癌的治疗方案。
Abstract: Cervical cancer is a common malignant tumor, with its incidence and mortality rates continuing to rise worldwide, which is particularly significant in low- and middle-income countries. This article reports the individualized treatment process of a patient with stage IIIC2 cervical cancer, emphasizing the importance of accurate staging and individualized treatment in improving the patient’s prognosis. The patient was diagnosed with poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, which invaded the deep myometrium (>2/3 of the myometrial wall). Additionally, the patient had perineural invasion, intravascular tumor thrombus, and a Ki-67 labeling index as high as 80%, all of which indicate aggressive biological behavior of the tumor. Imaging evaluation has limitations in determining lymph node metastasis. Preoperative MRI failed to accurately reflect the status of para-aortic lymph nodes, leading to inconsistencies between clinical and pathological staging. To address this challenge, this article discusses the importance of combined multimodal imaging evaluation to improve the accuracy of diagnosis. Meanwhile, this article emphasizes the application of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in high-risk patients, and points out the potential value of immunotherapy in advanced cervical cancer. By comprehensively considering the patient’s biological characteristics and overall health status, formulating an individualized treatment strategy is expected to improve treatment efficacy and survival rate. Although this study is a case report with a limited follow-up period, the analysis of this case provides new ideas and evidence for future clinical practice, and emphasizes the importance of continuous research on early diagnosis and individualized treatment strategies for cervical cancer. In the future, it is necessary to verify the conclusions in a larger-scale patient population to further optimize the treatment regimen for stage IIIC2 cervical cancer.
文章引用:时航, 温妙伟, 周方, 宋轶鹏. 伴有腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的IIIC2期宫颈癌 病例——影像学评估与个体化治疗的挑战与启示[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 370-378. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1651827

参考文献

[1] Shao, D., Wu, P., Jiang, H. and Wang, Z. (2026) Global Trends and Future Projections of Cervical Cancer Burden: An Integrated Analysis of GBD 2021, UN Population and WHO HPV Vaccination Data. Frontiers in Public Health, 14, Article ID: 1702186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Perez Bianchi, P., Anselmo, S., Vásquez Currié, M., Medel, J., Uelf, E., Dos Santos, A., et al. (2025) RIVA: An Image Dataset of Conventional Pap Smear Cytology with Multiple Independent Annotations. Scientific Data, 12, Article No. 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Han, L., Chen, Y., Zheng, A., Tan, X. and Chen, H. (2024) Stage Migration and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Cervical Cancer at Stage IIIC According to the 2018 FIGO Staging System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 14, Article ID: 1460543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Zhou, K., Wang, Y., Xie, Y., Yang, S., Liu, S., Fang, Y., et al. (2023) Symptom Burden Survey and Symptom Clusters in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Supportive Care in Cancer, 31, Article No. 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Ogut, E. (2025) Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine: Challenges across Diagnostic Imaging, Clinical Decision Support, Surgery, Pathology, and Drug Discovery. Clinics and Practice, 15, Article No. 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] De Tommasi, O., Spagnol, G., Marchetti, M., Bigardi, S., Noventa, M., Saccardi, C., et al. (2024) Lymph Node Metastasis in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Squaring the Circle? Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine, 4, e000112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Bonatti, M., Valletta, R., D’Erme, L., Dolciami, M., Chianura, R., Azzaro, P.P.M., et al. (2025) Preoperative Staging of Cervical Cancer: Time to Shift from Cystoscopy to MRI. European Radiology, 36, 3033-3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Woo, S., Atun, R., Ward, Z.J., Scott, A.M., Hricak, H. and Vargas, H.A. (2020) Diagnostic Performance of Conventional and Advanced Imaging Modalities for Assessing Newly Diagnosed Cervical Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Radiology, 30, 5560-5577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Pantel, K., Cote, R.J. and Fodstad, O. (1999) Detection and Clinical Importance of Micrometastatic Disease. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 91, 1113-1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Salib, M.Y., Russell, J.H.B., Stewart, V.R., Sudderuddin, S.A., Barwick, T.D., Rockall, A.G., et al. (2020) 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging. RadioGraphics, 40, 1807-1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Zhu, T., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Chen, Y., Yu, A., Chen, L., et al. (2017) Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-Aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 27, 1222-1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Yang, Q. and Han, X. (2025) Prognostic Value of Risk Factors in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Tumour Infiltration Depth. BMC Cancer, 25, Article No. 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Soochit, A., Zhang, C., Feng, Y., Luo, X., Huang, H. and Liu, J. (2023) Impact of Different Post-Operative Treatment Modalities on Long-Term Outcomes in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 Stage IIICp Cervical Cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 33, 882-889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Fields, E.C., Bosch, W.R., Albuquerque, K.V., Bhatia, R., Chino, J., Dyer, B., et al. (2025) Consensus Guidelines for Delineation of Clinical Target Volumes for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Intact Cervical Cancer: An Update. Practical Radiation Oncology, 15, 171-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Isohashi, F., Takano, T., Onuki, M., Arimoto, T., Kawamura, N., Hara, R., et al. (2019) A Multi-Institutional Observational Study on the Effects of Three-Dimensional Radiotherapy and Weekly 40 mg/m2 Cisplatin on Postoperative Uterine Cervical Cancer Patients with High-Risk Prognostic Factors. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24, 575-582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Wu, H., He, Y., Chen, D., Liu, M. and Zhao, X. (2024) High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Uterine Cervix Carcinoma: A Comparison of Dosimetry and Clinical Outcomes among Three Fractionation Schedules. Frontiers in Oncology, 14, Article ID: 1366323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Lee, N., Kim, S.I., Lee, M., Kim, H.S., Kim, J.W., Park, N.H., et al. (2019) Bevacizumab Efficacy and Recurrence Pattern of Persistent and Metastatic Cervical Cancer. In Vivo, 33, 863-868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Tanigawa, T., Takeshima, N., Ishikawa, H., Nishio, S., Usami, T., Yamawaki, T., et al. (2022) Paclitaxel-Carboplatin and Bevacizumab Combination with Maintenance Bevacizumab Therapy for Metastatic, Recurrent, and Persistent Uterine Cervical Cancer: An Open-Label Multicenter Phase II Trial (JGOG1079). Gynecologic Oncology, 165, 413-419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Ren, X., Fu, Y., Liu, Z., Lin, X., Qiu, L., Li, Y., et al. (2022) Image-Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy for Recurrent Cervical Cancer after Radiotherapy: A Single Institution Experience. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article ID: 943703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Yu, D., Bai, Y., Feng, Y., Wang, L., Yun, W., Li, X., et al. (2020) Which Bone Marrow Sparing Strategy and Radiotherapy Technology Is Most Beneficial in Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Patients with Cervical Cancer? Frontiers in Oncology, 10, Article ID: 554241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Romero, D. (2025) Cadonilimab Is Effective and Safe in Recurrent Cervical Cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 22, Article No. 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Jääskeläinen, E., Kärkkäinen, H., Palmgren, J., Haataja, M., Hinkula, M. and Anttila, M. (2025) Implementing Treatment According to the Guidelines Is of Paramount Importance in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Real-World Study. Frontiers in Oncology, 15, Article ID: 1562067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Li, Y., Cao, S., Fan, Y., Zhang, Y. and Li, J. (2025) Survival Outcomes in IIIC Cervical Cancer by Treatment Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Cancer, 25, Article No. 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Lakhman, Y., Aherne, E.A., Jayaprakasam, V.S., Nougaret, S. and Reinhold, C. (2023) Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Practical Approach Using MRI and FDG PET. American Journal of Roentgenology, 221, 633-648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Luo, S., Guo, Y., Ye, Y., Mu, Q., Huang, W. and Tang, G. (2025) Prediction of Cervical Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis Based on Multisequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics and Deep Learning Features: A Dual-Center Study. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 29259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Ninkova, R.V., Calabrese, A., Curti, F., Riccardi, S., Gennarini, M., Miceli, V., et al. (2024) The Performance of the Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) and DWI-MRI in Staging Patients with Cervical Carcinoma According to the New FIGO Classification (2018). La Radiologia Medica, 129, 1062-1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Sun, X., He, L. and Wang, S. (2025) Risk Factors for Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 186 Patients. Frontiers in Oncology, 15, Article ID: 1525946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Nakano, T. and Oka, K. (1993) Differential Values of Ki-67 Index and Mitotic Index of Proliferating Cell Population. An Assessment of Cell Cycle and Prognosis in Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer. Cancer, 72, 2401-2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] 温妙伟, 周方, 赵冰莹, 等. 伴腹盆腔淋巴结转移宫颈癌综合治疗现状与研究进展[J/OL]. 肿瘤学杂志: 1-8.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/33.1266.R.20260320.1323.003, 2026-04-23.
[30] Monk, B.J., Toita, T., Wu, X., Vázquez Limón, J.C., Tarnawski, R., Mandai, M., et al. (2023) Durvalumab versus Placebo with Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (CALLA): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 24, 1334-1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Liu, Z., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Zong, Y., Zhou, T., Wu, D., et al. (2025) Development and Validation of Immunotherapy Nomogram for Predicting the Efficacy and Prognosis of Recurrent and Metastatic Cervical Cancer. Frontiers in Immunology, 16, Article ID: 1662605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Guo, W., Ren, R., Li, N. and Hu, Y. (2024) Prognosis and Treatment Regimens for Patients with Different Lymph Node Statuses in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 50, Article ID: 108522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Cibula, D., Raspollini, M.R., Planchamp, F., Centeno, C., Chargari, C., Felix, A., et al. (2023) ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Cervical Cancer—Update 2023. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 33, 649-666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Shylasree, T.S., Gurram, L. and Das, U. (2021) Para-Aortic Lymph Node Involvement in Cervical Cancer: Implications for Staging, Outcome and Treatment. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 154, 267-272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Jiang, C.-Q., Li, X.-J., Zhou, Z.-Y., Xin, Q. and Yu, L. (2025) Imaging Based Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 15, Article ID: 1532698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Olthof, E.P., van der Aa, M.A., Adam, J.A., Stalpers, L.J.A., Wenzel, H.H.B., van der Velden, J., et al. (2021) The Role of Lymph Nodes in Cervical Cancer: Incidence and Identification of Lymph Node Metastases—A Literature Review. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 1600-1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Xu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, Y. and Huang, D. (2025) Addressing the Current Challenges in the Clinical Application of AI-Based Radiomics for Cancer Imaging. Frontiers in Medicine, 12, Article ID: 1674397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] Bhatla, N., Berek, J.S., Cuello Fredes, M., Denny, L.A., Grenman, S., Karunaratne, K., et al. (2019) Revised FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 145, 129-135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Bao, Y.H., Chen, Y., Xiao, M.L., Li, Y.A., Ma, F.H., Li, H.M., et al. (2026) Primary Tumor-Derived, Multiparametric MRI-Based Deep Learning-Radiomics-Clinical Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Insights into Imaging, 17, Article No. 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef