脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后神经功能恶化预测模型的系统评价
A Systematic Review of Prediction Models for Neurological Deterioration after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1651828, PDF,   
作者: 张悦琦, 张玉洁, 周 婷:山西中医药大学护理学院,山西 晋中;杨 瑛*:山西中医药大学护理学院,山西 晋中;太原钢铁(集团)有限公司总医院护理部,山西 太原;崔丽萍:山西白求恩医院护理部,山西 太原
关键词: 急性缺血性脑卒中早期神经功能恶化预测模型系统评价Acute Ischemic Stroke Early Neurological Deterioration Predictive Model Systematic Review
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在评价急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后早期神经功能恶化相关预测模型,为患者精准护理与预后评估提供循证依据。方法:系统检索PubMed、中国知网等中英文数据库,由2名经培训的科研人员独立完成文献筛选、资料提取与方法学质量评价。结果:最终纳入21篇文献,含32个预测模型(核心模型21个),以Logistic回归构建的列线图模型为主,高频预测指标为基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分、血管病变类型。多数模型受试者工作特征曲线下面积 ≥ 0.70,区分度良好;仅5个核心模型完成外部验证,12个模型未报告校准度,9篇文献偏倚风险不明确。结论:现有早期神经功能恶化预测模型已形成初步研究体系,列线图模型更适配临床护理场景,但其普适性与外推稳定性仍需进一步验证。
Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the construction, validation, and application effectiveness of early neurological deterioration prediction models after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke, providing evidence-based guidance for precise patient care and prognosis assessment. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in both Chinese and English databases such as PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Literature screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment were independently performed by two trained researchers. Results: A total of 21 studies were included, encompassing 32 prediction models (21 core models), primarily nomogram models constructed using Logistic regression. High-frequency predictive indicators included baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and types of vascular lesions. Most models had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ≥ 0.70, indicating good discrimination; only 5 core models underwent external validation, 12 models did not report calibration, and the risk of bias was unclear in 9 studies. Conclusion: Existing early neurological deterioration prediction models have formed a preliminary research framework. Nomogram models are more suitable for clinical care scenarios, but their generalizability and extrapolation stability still require further validation.
文章引用:张悦琦, 杨瑛, 崔丽萍, 张玉洁, 周婷. 脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后神经功能恶化预测模型的系统评价[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 379-390. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1651828

参考文献

[1] 毛凡, 姜莹莹, 刘韫宁, 等. 中国居民心脑血管疾病流行现况及危险因素分析: 基于2017年中国心血管健康指数研究[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2021, 55(11): 1280-1286.
[2] 纪芳, 孙伟, 朱蕾, 等. 阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗老年急性脑梗死的疗效及其危险因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2025, 45(7): 1547-1550.
[3] 姜波涛, 陈婵娟, 谭红, 等. 急性脑梗死患者阿替普酶静脉溶栓后神经功能和预后与血生化常见指标的相关性分析[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2024, 26(1): 63-66.
[4] Harale, M., Oommen, A., Faruqi, A., Mundada, M., Reddy, R.H., Pancholi, T., et al. (2024) Study of Biochemical Predictors of Early Neurological Deterioration in Ischemic Stroke in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus, 16, e68183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 何妮, 黄攀, 刘梦, 等. 全身炎症反应指数与急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期神经功能恶化及预后的相关性研究[J]. 华西医学, 2024, 39(4): 580-587.
[6] 林琬, 林麒. 颅内动脉狭窄致缺血性脑卒中病人早期神经功能恶化的危险因素分析[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2022, 20(4): 745-748.
[7] 鲁小丹, 卫建华, 沈建通, 等. 预测模型系统评价的制作方法与步骤[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(5): 602-609.
[8] 薛娟, 李娟, 刘加玲, 等. 脑卒中患者吞咽障碍风险预测模型的研究进展[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2023, 30(7): 5-9.
[9] Moons, K.G.M., de Groot, J.A.H., Bouwmeester, W., Vergouwe, Y., Mallett, S., Altman, D.G., et al. (2014) Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist. PLOS Medicine, 11, e1001744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 陈香萍, 张奕, 庄一渝, 等. PROBAST: 诊断或预后多因素预测模型研究偏倚风险的评估工具[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(6): 737-744.
[11] Moons, K.G.M., Wolff, R.F., Riley, R.D., Whiting, P.F., Westwood, M., Collins, G.S., et al. (2019) PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170, W1-W33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Ba, Y., Xu, X., Gao, H., et al. (2025) Comparative Accuracy of Different Machine Learning Models in Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration after Intravenous rt-PA Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 35, 1396-1401.
[13] Gong, P., Xie, Y., Jiang, T., Liu, Y., Wang, M., Sun, H., et al. (2019) Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Post-Thrombolysis Early Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. Brain and Behavior, 9, e1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Li, J., Chang, H., Du, S., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Li, L., et al. (2025) Development and Validation of a Web-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration Following Stroke Thrombolysis: Multicenter Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e77858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Li, N., Li, Y., Shao, J., Wang, C., Li, S. and Jiang, Y. (2024) Optimizing Early Neurological Deterioration Prediction in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Following Intravenous Thrombolysis: A LASSO Regression Model Approach. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, Article 1390117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Lyu, Z., Yang, H., Wang, Y., et al. (2023) Establishment and Evaluation of a Predictive Model for Early Neurological Deterioration after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Machine Learning. Chinese Critical Care Medicine, 35, 945-950.
[17] Tian, T., Wang, L., Xu, J., Jia, Y., Xue, K., Huang, S., et al. (2023) Prediction of Early Neurological Deterioration in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 43, 2049-2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Wei, L., Zhou, X., Zhou, Z., Zhang, K., Meng, J., Huang, X., et al. (2025) Accurate Forecasting in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Innovative Nomogram Models for Early Neurological Deterioration and 90-Day Prognosis Outcomes Following Intravenous Thrombolysis. European Journal of Medical Research, 30, Article No. 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Wei, L., Wu, Z., Zhou, X., Liu, Z., Wu, X., Zhang, K., et al. (2025) Nomogram Models Integrating TyG Index for Predicting Early Neurological Deterioration and 90-Day Outcomes in AIS Patients Undergoing IVT. Journal of Central Nervous System Disease, 17, Article 11795735251382435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Wen, R., Wang, M., Bian, W., Zhu, H., Xiao, Y., Zeng, J., et al. (2024) Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Early Neurological Deterioration after Intravenous Thrombolysis for Stroke: Insights from a Large Multicenter Study. Frontiers in Neurology, 15, Article 1408457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Zhu, Z., Muhammad, B., Du, B., Gu, N., Meng, T., Kan, S., et al. (2023) Elevated NT-proBNP Predicts Unfavorable Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke after Thrombolytic Therapy. BMC Neurology, 23, Article No. 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Zhang, X., Jiang, S., Zhang, D., Chen, S., Kong, Y., Bai, Y., et al. (2025) A Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Early Neurological Deterioration in Patients with Stroke Undergoing Intravenous Thrombolysis. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 88, 273-282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 陈敏, 冯灵, 涂双燕, 等. 急性大动脉闭塞性脑梗死患者血管再通治疗后早期神经功能恶化的影响因素分析[J]. 河北医学, 2021, 27(11): 1801-1806.
[24] 陈钊, 樊雪娇, 方翠敬, 等. DRAGON评分联合血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对急性脑梗死溶栓后早期神经功能恶化的预测价值[J]. 大医生, 2023, 8(23): 92-96.
[25] 邓勇, 李迪, 祁恒旭, 等. 脑卒中静脉溶栓后早期神经功能恶化诺莫图预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2024, 47(2): 221-226.
[26] 高林林. 急性脑梗死患者近期神经功能预后预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 大医生, 2025, 10(4): 106-109.
[27] 黄治胜, 方芳, 罗渝民. sTNFR1、NCAM及脑白质高信号对老年急性脑梗死患者溶栓后早期神经功能恶化的诊断价值[J]. 脑与神经疾病杂志, 2024, 32(9): 534-538.
[28] 李百艳, 王磊, 米晓璐, 等. 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓早期神经功能恶化列线图预测模型构建[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2025, 38(23): 95-104.
[29] 王甜甜, 付记桐, 孙林林, 等. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者发病至静脉溶栓时间对早期神经功能恶化的影响[J]. 临床神经病学杂志, 2024, 37(5): 339-344.
[30] 刘锡荣, 鲁庆波, 于慧娟, 等. 缺血性脑卒中患者rt-PA静脉溶栓后END分析以及预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 卒中与神经疾病, 2025, 32(6): 586-601.
[31] 徐守权, 唐国文, 黄舞标, 等. BP神经网络、随机森林和决策树预测急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓后发生早期神经功能恶化的效能比较[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2023, 31(2): 16-21.
[32] 李彬. 急性脑梗死阿替普酶溶栓后早期神经功能恶化预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 安徽医药, 2022, 26(8): 1627-1632.
[33] Calimano-Ramirez, L.F., Virarkar, M.K., Hernandez, M., Ozdemir, S., Kumar, S., Gopireddy, D.R., et al. (2023) MRI-Based Nomograms and Radiomics in Presurgical Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Abdominal Radiology, 48, 2379-2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] 范奕萱, 黄莉, 王雯, 等. 风痰瘀阻证急性缺血性脑卒中患者神经功能缺损危重风险列线图预测模型的构建及分级护理策略的构建[J]. 重庆医学, 2026, 55(3): 550-555.
[35] di Biase, L., Bonura, A., Pecoraro, P.M., Carbone, S.P. and Di Lazzaro, V. (2023) Unlocking the Potential of Stroke Blood Biomarkers: Early Diagnosis, Ischemic vs. Haemorrhagic Differentiation and Haemorrhagic Transformation Risk: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, Article 11545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] 谷鸿秋, 王俊峰, 章仲恒, 等. 临床预测模型: 模型的建立[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2019, 11(1): 14-16.
[37] 杨翔鹭, 贾盈盈, 朱淑婷, 等. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后急性肾损伤预测模型的系统评价与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志: 1-10.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/51.1492.R.20260312.1551.042, 2026-04-27.
[38] 李永刚, 黄雨佳, 刘庚, 等. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者机械通气时间延长风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(6): 58-62.
[39] 陈滢伊, 尹遇冬. 比索洛尔在冠脉支架术后心律失常及心电图QT间期延长预防中的作用[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2025, 48(6): 126-128.
[40] Wolff, R.F., Moons, K.G.M., Riley, R.D., Whiting, P.F., Westwood, M., Collins, G.S., et al. (2019) PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170, 51-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Collins, G.S., Reitsma, J.B., Altman, D.G. and Moons, K.G.M. (2015) Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162, 55-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] 孙屿昕, 侯文斌, 陈韵如, 等. 中医药个体预后与诊断预测模型研究报告规范——TRIPOD-TCM清单[J]. 中医杂志, 2022, 63(10): 936-942.
[43] Jenkins, D.A., Martin, G.P., Sperrin, M., Riley, R.D., Debray, T.P.A., Collins, G.S., et al. (2021) Continual Updating and Monitoring of Clinical Prediction Models: Time for Dynamic Prediction Systems? Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 5, Article No. 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] 王亚琪. 基于IPD与AgD结合的网状Meta回归模型研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023.
[45] 孙晓晖, 彭毛卓玛, 宋晓微, 等. 卒中后神经功能恶化预测模型研究现状的范围综述[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2025, 22(4): 235-251.