类型学视野下的汉维专有名词生命度及其句法效应
A Typological Study of the Animacy of Proper Nouns and Its Syntactic Effects in Chinese and Uyghur
摘要: 本文基于生命度理论,以语言类型学为落脚点,考察现代汉语与现代维吾尔语中指人专有名词与地点专有名词的句法效应。从人称代词回指、高生命度动词结构及“V的N”结构三个维度展开分析,发现两种语言在回指层面共性显著,均受动词语义指向与话题凸显原则制约;在论元选择及“V的N”结构层面差异明显,维吾尔语准入范围更广,汉语限制更严。这一差异印证了形态丰富度与语义制约程度呈负相关的类型学规律,为汉维语言对比研究提供了新的视角。
Abstract: Based on animacy theory and with a focus on linguistic typology, this paper examines the syntactic effects of personal proper nouns and place proper nouns in modern Chinese and modern Uyghur. It analyzes three dimensions: personal pronoun anaphora, high-animacy verb constructions, and the “V de N” construction. The findings show that the two languages share significant similarities in anaphora, both being governed by the semantic orientation of verbs and the principle of topic highlighting. However, they differ markedly in argument selection and the “V de N” construction: Uyghur allows a wider range of nouns to enter these structures, while Chinese imposes stricter constraints. This contrast confirms the typological principle that morphological richness is negatively correlated with the degree of semantic constraint, offering a new perspective for contrastive research on Chinese and Uyghur.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Bernard Comrie. 语言共性和语言类型[M]. 沈家煊, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 1989.
|
|
[2]
|
杨海明. 生命度与汉语句法的若干问题研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2007.
|
|
[3]
|
武玉飞. 类型学视角下的汉维语量词生命度探析[J]. 山东青年, 2020(9): 123, 125.
|
|
[4]
|
阿依克孜∙卡德尔. 现代汉语与现代维吾尔语名词对比研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2006.
|
|
[5]
|
徐赳赳. 现代汉语篇章回指研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2003.
|
|
[6]
|
温爱华. 两种专有名词的生命度及其对句法的影响[J]. 江西科技师范大学学报, 2019(1): 31-37.
|
|
[7]
|
力提甫∙托乎提. 现代维吾尔语参考语法[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2012.
|
|
[8]
|
赵瑞兰. 汉语名词生命度初论[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 华南师范大学, 2007.
|