1994~2023年滇池水质变化及差异性分析
Analysis of Water Quality Changes and Differences in Dianchi Lake from 1994 to 2023
DOI: 10.12677/aep.2026.165073, PDF,   
作者: 姚颖吉:云南省水文水资源局红河分局,云南 蒙自
关键词: 滇池水质指标时空变化差异性Dianchi Lake Water Quality Indicator Spatiotemporal Variation Difference
摘要: 为揭示滇池长期水质演变规律与时空差异特征,基于1994~2023年滇池(草海、外海)水质监测数据,采用单因子评价法,从全湖年均、汛期与非汛期、多年月均等多时间尺度开展描述性分析;另外,选取总氮、总磷、氨氮和高锰酸盐指数为核心指标,分析逐年、多年月度变化情况。运用SPSS、GIS软件,分析各十年段间水质类别差异、汛期与非汛期差异以及空间差异。结果表明:1) 草海和外海高锰酸盐指数、氨氮、总磷和总氮含量均在2013年以后出现明显改善。2) 从年均水质类别来看,滇池草海和外海均表现为汛期劣V类占比高于非汛期,但通过差异性分析,汛期和非汛期不存在显著差异。3) 滇池氮磷比在1994~2023年内呈上升趋势,表现为磷限制为主。4) 滇池外海北部的高锰酸盐指数、氨氮、总磷和总氮均与其它位置存在显著差异。
Abstract: To reveal the long-term evolution and spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics of water quality in Dianchi Lake, based on water quality monitoring data from 1994 to 2023, the single-factor evaluation method was used to conduct descriptive analyses on annual mean, flood season vs. non-flood season, and multi-year monthly water quality across the entire lake. In addition, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen, and permanganate index were selected as core indicators to analyze their annual and multi-year monthly variations. SPSS and GIS software were used to examine the differences in water quality classification among three decadal periods, between flood and non-flood seasons, and across spatial locations. The results show that: 1) The permanganate index, ammonia nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen in both Caohai and Waihai have improved significantly since 2013. 2) In terms of annual average water quality classification, both Caohai and Waihai exhibit a higher proportion of inferior Class V water during the flood season than in the non-flood season. However, the difference analysis indicates no significant difference between flood and non-flood seasons. 3) The nitrogen-phosphorus ratio in Dianchi Lake showed an upward trend from 1994 to 2023, indicating a dominance of phosphorus limitation. 4) The permanganate index, ammonia nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen in the northern part of Waihai are significantly different from those in other locations.
文章引用:姚颖吉. 1994~2023年滇池水质变化及差异性分析[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2026, 16(5): 727-740. https://doi.org/10.12677/aep.2026.165073

参考文献

[1] 祝艳, 韩林沛, 刘丽君, 等. 2018年滇池水环境质量评价研究[J]. 环境科学导刊, 2020, 39(2): 75-85.
[2] 张卓亚, 刘晨阳, 朱昱泽, 等. 1990-2020年滇池水质时空变化特征及评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2023, 43(4): 141-151.
[3] 王艺颐. 牛栏江-滇池补水工程运行后滇池环境改善的效果研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2023.
[4] 段仲昭, 王明净, 高伟, 等. 1951-2017年滇池流域极端降水变化及湖体水质响应[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(2): 615-622.
[5] 李加龙, 罗纯良, 吕恒, 等. 2002-2018年滇池外海蓝藻水华暴发时空变化特征及其驱动因子[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(2): 878-891.
[6] 杨凡, 马巍, 陈欣, 等. 滇池pH值异常升高的主要影响因素识别及其驱动机理[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(1): 75-82.
[7] Phillips, G., Bramwell, A., Pitt, J., Stansfield, J. and Perrow, M. (1999) Practical Application of 25 Years’ Research into the Management of Shallow Lakes. Hydrobiologia, 395, 61-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 黄杰, 王英才, 邓晓庆, 等. 滇池水质及营养状态时空变化特征[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(6): 61-67.
[9] 王杰, 毛建忠, 谢永红, 等. 2008-2014年滇池水质时空变化特征分析[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(5): 11-15.
[10] 贺克雕, 高伟, 段昌群, 等. 滇池、抚仙湖、阳宗海长期水位变化(1988-2015年)及驱动因子[J]. 湖泊科学, 2019, 31(5): 1379-1390.
[11] 郭怀成, 王心宇, 伊璇. 基于滇池水生态系统演替的富营养化控制策略[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(6): 998-1006.
[12] 中国环境报. 云南组织专家把脉旱灾危害 生态系统面临严重威胁 环保协调相关部门加强监测严防污染事故发生[N/OL]. 2010-04-02.
https://sthjt.yn.gov.cn/ywdt/xxywrdjj/201004/t20100402_7631.html, 2026-04-06.
[13] 杨枫, 许秋瑾, 宋永会, 等. 滇池流域水生态环境演变趋势、治理历程及成效[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(3): 633-643.
[14] Li, X., Janssen, A.B.G., de Klein, J.J.M., Kroeze, C., Strokal, M., Ma, L., et al. (2019) Modeling Nutrients in Lake Dianchi (China) and Its Watershed. Agricultural Water Management, 212, 48-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 朱天源, 赵海霞, 范金鼎, 等. 滇池流域河湖水环境时空分异及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2023, 32(6): 1305-1316.
[16] 云南省水利厅. 十年守护高原明珠 绿美春城建设有我——牛栏江-滇池补水工程通水10年引水济昆效益显[EB/OL]. 2023-12-28.
https://wcb.yn.gov.cn/html/2023/yewuzhuanlan_1228/57957.html, 2026-04-19.
[17] 高伟, 程国微, 严长安, 等. 1988-2018年滇池氮磷比的时空演变特征与原因解析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(1): 64-73.