法学与数智技术在建筑文化遗产活态传承中的应用研究
Research on the Application of Law and Digital Intelligence Technology in the Living Inheritance of Architectural Cultural Heritage
摘要: 建筑文化遗产活态传承是文化可持续发展的核心议题,当前行业面临“技术超前、制度滞后”的核心矛盾。本研究立足现有法律框架与技术基础,以该矛盾为切入点,采用规范分析、案例研究与政策评估相结合的方法,系统分析制度建设、技术应用及实践成效现状,深入剖析权责界定模糊、技术标准不统一、多元协同机制不畅等核心问题。研究通过构建专项登记机制、完善技术标准与认证体系、搭建多元协同功能模块,提出“法学–数智技术”协同的活态传承体系。本文基于案例观察发现,需以全流程规范化专项登记填补制度空白,以统一标准强化技术与文化融合,依托四大核心模块构建多元协同网络。本研究创新性建立“技术优化实施路径–法律明确权利义务”双向互动机制,为化解技术与制度脱节问题提供解决方案,助力建筑文化遗产在数字化时代实现可持续活态传承。
Abstract: The living inheritance of architectural cultural heritage is a core issue in the sustainable development of culture, and the industry is currently facing the fundamental contradiction of “advanced technology versus lagging institutions”. Based on the existing legal framework and technological foundation, this study takes this contradiction as its starting point and adopts a combination of normative analysis, case studies, and policy evaluation methods to systematically analyze the current status of institutional construction, technology application, and practical effectiveness. It also delves into core issues such as ambiguous definition of rights and responsibilities, inconsistent technical standards, and ineffective multi-party collaboration mechanisms. By constructing a special registration mechanism, improving the technical standards and certification system, and building functional modules for multi-stakeholder collaboration, this study proposes a living inheritance system featuring the synergy between law and digital intelligence technology. Based on case observations, this paper finds that it is necessary to fill institutional gaps through full-process standardized special registration, strengthen the integration of technology and culture with unified standards, and build a multi-stakeholder collaborative network relying on four core modules. This study innovatively establishes a two-way interactive mechanism of “technology-optimized implementation path and law-defined rights and obligations”, provides a solution to resolve the disconnection between technology and institutions, and facilitates the sustainable living inheritance of architectural cultural heritage in the digital era.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
赵鹏飞, 崔小童, 王子怡. 大运河建筑遗产文化基因图谱构建及保护传承研究以聊城古城区为例[J]. 室内设计与装修, 2025(8): 117-119.
|
|
[2]
|
沈熠铭. 基于生成式AI的人工智能促进建筑文化遗产保护传承发展研究[J]. 新楚文化, 2025(18): 75-78.
|
|
[3]
|
胡小伍, 何川, 谭瑞珍, 等. 基于点云的历史建筑数字化研究[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2023, 46(10): 140-142.
|
|
[4]
|
孙晓阳, 张润东, 严光芒, 等. 基于多源数据的古建筑数字化建模技术研究与应用[J]. 施工技术, 2023, 52(16): 138-143.
|
|
[5]
|
贺鼎, 张博涵, 邢迪, 等. 活态遗产视角下的城市更新路径探索——以景德镇新村西路街区复兴项目为例[J]. 中外建筑, 2025(1): 28-35.
|
|
[6]
|
顾军, 韶静, 顾明欣, 等. 数字技术融筑南京文旅新途[J]. 文化产业, 2025(31): 82-84.
|
|
[7]
|
张爱琳, 王凯, 丁超, 等. 基于形状分布-平均绝对误差法的历史建筑数字孪生模型更新方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2025, 25(12): 5058-5065.
|
|
[8]
|
陈可, 王晶, 王煜鑫. 数智驱动下的历史建筑保护与传承策略研究[J]. 中国勘察设计, 2025(9): 88-94.
|
|
[9]
|
王世强, 伊巴代提·艾合买提, 陈燕. 文旅融合文旅融合背景下“历史建筑+”全民阅读推广模式探究——基于PESTLE分析法[J]. 图书馆, 2024(8): 32-37.
|
|
[10]
|
胡伟爔, 潘志庚, 刘喜作, 等. 虚拟世界自然文化遗产保护关键技术概述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2003(3): 315-318.
|
|
[11]
|
The Commission on Global Governance (1995) Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford University Press, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
李永辉. 当前文物建筑保护的难题与对策[J]. 人民论坛, 2024(18): 96-100.
|
|
[13]
|
何水. 协同治理及其在中国的实现——基于社会资本理论的分析[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2008(3): 102-106.
|
|
[14]
|
江凌. 保护传承城市历史建筑文脉的“多中心”治理策略[J]. 社会科学论坛, 2019(5): 192-205.
|