数字技术赋能流动儿童家校社协同育人机制研究
Research on the Mechanism of Coordinated Education for Migrant Children by Families, Schools, and Communities Empowered by Digital Technology
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.165862, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杜心睿:中华女子学院儿童发展与教育学院,北京
关键词: 流动儿童家校社协同育人人工智能技术Mobile Children Collaborative Education among Schools Families and Communities Artificial Intelligence Technology
摘要: 随着我国流动人口规模扩大,流动儿童教育问题愈发突出,家校社协同育人成为解决该问题的关键路径,而人工智能技术为教育协同发展提供了新可能。本研究以生态系统理论、创新生态系统理论为基础,采用多案例质性研究法,选取北京、上海、广州三地流动人口聚居区为调研对象,对42名流动儿童家长、教师及社区工作者开展访谈与实地观察。研究发现,当前流动儿童家校社协同育人呈松散化、碎片化特征,AI技术应用呈现“学校先行、家庭分化、社区滞后”的非均衡格局,存在家长数字素养不足、各主体数据不通、社区数字基础设施薄弱等现实困境。在此基础上,本研究从微系统互动与中间系统联结双维度,剖析了AI技术赋能协同育人的核心机制,并从家庭、学校、社区及协同机制层面提出针对性优化路径。
Abstract: As the scale of the floating population in China expands, the educational issues of migrant children have become increasingly prominent. Collaborative education involving families, schools, and communities has emerged as a crucial approach to address this problem, while artificial intelligence (AI) technology offers new possibilities for the coordinated development of education. Based on the ecosystem theory and the innovation ecosystem theory, this study employs the multi-case qualitative research method. It selects the floating population accumulation areas in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou as the research subjects, and conducts interviews and on-site observations with 42 parents of migrant children, teachers, and community workers. The research findings indicate that the current collaborative education involving families, schools, and communities for migrant children is characterized by looseness and fragmentation. The application of AI technology presents an unbalanced pattern of “schools taking the lead, families showing differentiation, and communities lagging behind”, and there are practical challenges such as insufficient digital literacy among parents, unconnected data among various entities, and weak digital infrastructure in communities. On this basis, this study analyzes the core mechanism of AI - enabled collaborative education from the two dimensions of microsystem interaction and mesosystem connection, and proposes targeted optimization paths at the levels of families, schools, communities, and the collaborative mechanism.
文章引用:杜心睿. 数字技术赋能流动儿童家校社协同育人机制研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(5): 338-346. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.165862

参考文献

[1] https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/d7c/202303/P020230301403217959330.pdf, 2026-05-06.
[2] 段成荣, 吕利丹, 王宗萍. 我国流动儿童生存和发展: 问题与对策——基于2010年第六次全国人口普查数据的分析[J]. 南方人口, 2013, 28(4): 44-55.
[3] 邵雅利, 阮舒婕, 刘梧凤, 曾令甜. 社会生态系统理论下流动儿童心理健康的多维分析与干预路径[J]. 乡村论丛, 2025(4): 20-30.
[4] 张冰怡, 张冠李. 提供、保护和参与: 城市流动儿童数字使用鸿沟的田野调查[J]. 少年儿童研究, 2024(5): 40-48+112.
[5] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
[6] 杨靖. 县域流动儿童数字素养教育体系建构与实践路径研究[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2024(6): 74-81.
[7] Gutman, M. and Yemini, M. (2022) Israeli Global Mobile Families Returning Home: Children’s Social-Cultural Identities in Transition. Childrens Geographies, 21, 721-736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 武砀, 武爱红, 武晓黎. 2011-2021年学前流动儿童家庭教育研究综述[J]. 教育观察, 2022, 11(24): 17-20.
[9] 刘海云, 封丽华. 家园共育促进流动幼儿社会性发展的实证研究[J]. 宁波教育学院学报, 2021, 23(5): 20-25.
[10] Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006) How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18, 59-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 张军华. 基于大数据的流动儿童社会适应促进策略研究[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2018(42): 90-92.