巴塘县农村社会企业孵化困境与优化路径研究——以嘻啵农场为例
A Study on the Incubation Dilemmas and Optimization Paths of Rural Social Enterprises in Batang County—A Case Study of Xibo Farm
DOI: 10.12677/mse.2026.153050, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 洛绒邓堆, 志玛曲措:西南民族大学管理学院,四川 成都
关键词: 巴塘县农村社会企业孵化困境嘻啵农场Batang County Rural Social Enterprise Incubation Dilemmas Xibo Farm
摘要: 乡村振兴战略实施中,农村社会企业是激活乡村内生动力、完善基层治理的重要载体。文章以四川省甘孜州巴塘县为研究范围,以当地典型农村社会企业“嘻啵农场”为案例,基于资源依赖理论与内生发展理论,通过参与观察、深度访谈等方法,系统梳理其2022年成立以来的完整孵化历程,分析巴塘县农村社会企业孵化的现实困境与深层成因。研究发现,巴塘县农村社会企业孵化呈现出鲜明的阶段性特征,普遍面临资源供需错位、多头管理协调难、村民参与度低、过度依赖公共部门资源、现代制度与乡土习惯冲突等核心困境,根源在于外部行政逻辑与本地乡土逻辑的脱节。结合嘻啵农场的转型实践,从资源投放、跨部门协同、村民内生动力激活、自我造血能力培育、制度乡土融合五个维度提出优化路径,为巴塘县农村社会企业高质量发展提供实践参考,也为同类西部民族县域提供经验借鉴。
Abstract: In the implementation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy, rural social enterprises have become important vehicles for stimulating endogenous rural development and improving grassroots governance. Taking Batang County in Ganzi Prefecture, Sichuan Province, as the research area and the local representative rural social enterprise, Xibo Farm, as the case, this study draws on Resource Dependence Theory and Endogenous Development Theory. Using participant observation, in-depth interviews, and other qualitative methods, it systematically reviews the complete incubation process of Xibo Farm since its establishment in 2022 and analyzes the practical dilemmas and underlying causes of rural social enterprise incubation in Batang County. The findings show that the incubation of rural social enterprises in Batang County demonstrates clear stage-based characteristics and generally faces five major dilemmas: the mismatch between resource supply and operational needs, difficulties in coordination under fragmented multi-departmental management, low levels of villager participation, excessive dependence on government resources, and conflicts between modern institutional arrangements and local rural customs. At the root of these dilemmas lies the disconnection between external administrative logic and local indigenous logic. Drawing on the transformation practices of Xibo Farm, this paper proposes optimization paths from five dimensions: resource allocation, cross-departmental coordination, activation of villagers’ subjectivity, cultivation of self-sustaining capacity, and the integration of formal institutions with local rural society. The study aims to provide practical references for the high-quality development of rural social enterprises in Batang County and offer useful insights for similar ethnic minority counties in western China.
文章引用:洛绒邓堆, 志玛曲措. 巴塘县农村社会企业孵化困境与优化路径研究——以嘻啵农场为例[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2026, 15(3): 507-517. https://doi.org/10.12677/mse.2026.153050

参考文献

[1] 汪龙鑫, 闵学勤. 打造共同体: 内生型社会企业参与社区治理的驱动因素与实现路径研究[J]. 社会发展研究, 2025, 12(3): 1-20, 242.
[2] 钟慧澜, 章晓懿. 激励相容与共同创业: 养老服务中政府与社会企业合作供给模式研究[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2015, 16(5): 31-40.
[3] https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2023-02/22/content_5742671.htm
[4] https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202402/content_6929934.htm
[5] https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202406/content_6957138.htm
[6] 徐彩云, 李健. 传统组织转型社会企业为何难以成功?——基于新制度主义理论的多案例分析[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2025, 14(3): 95-111.
[7] 赵晓峰, 马锐. 协同共治: 农村社会治理共同体建设中企业行为研究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 52(2): 127-137.
[8] 王刚, 黄鹏. 公共性重塑: 乡村文化振兴的善治逻辑[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 51(1): 38-44.
[9] 敬乂嘉. 控制与赋权: 中国政府的社会组织发展策略[J]. 学海, 2016(1): 22-33.
[10] Salamon, L.M. (1995) Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[11] Najam, A. (2000) The Four C’s of Government Third Sector‐Government Relations: Cooperation, Confrontation, Complementarity, and Co-Optation. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10, 375-396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 许艳芳, 朱春玲, 曾萌. 从遵从到创造: 社会企业获取组织合法性的路径与策略——基于纵向单案例研究方法[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 41(2): 95-110.
[13] 金仁仙. 中国社会企业的现状、评析及其发展战略[J]. 兰州学刊, 2016(10): 188-195.
[14] 赵晓峰. 从合约治理到行政统合——资本下乡过程中治理策略转换的案例研究[J]. 社会学评论, 2022, 10(4): 222-239.
[15] 赵一红, 马灵均, 薛雨. 情景嵌合与共生赋能: 内生型社会组织参与社区养老服务路径研究[J]. 社会工作, 2025(1): 110-127, 161-164.
[16] Bourdieu, P. (1986) The Forms of Capital. In: Richardson, J., Ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood, 241-258.
[17] Ray, C. (1998) Culture, Intellectual Property and Territorial Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 38, 3-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Uphoff, N. (1992) Learning from Gal Oya: Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science. Cornell University Press, 448 p.
[19] 何立军, 李发戈, 朱志伟. 营利组织和非营利组织转型社会企业的动力因素——基于成都两家社会企业的比较研究[J]. 社会发展研究, 2024, 11(4): 209-225, 246.
[20] 郭道久, 康炯慧. 地方政府政策驱动社会企业公益功能的实现机制研究——基于政策文本的扎根理论分析[J]. 山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 48(5): 140-150.
[21] Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row.
[22] Bloodgood, E.A. and Tremblay-Boire, J. (2017) Does Government Funding Suppress Nonprofits’ Political Activity? American Political Science Review, 111, 134-150.
[23] Ray, C. (2001) Transnational Co‐Operation between Rural Areas: Elements of a Political Economy of EU Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 41, 279-295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] High, C. and Nemes, G. (2007) Social Learning in LEADER: Exogenous, Endogenous and Hybrid Evaluation in Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis, 47, 103-119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Escobar, A. (1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press, 290 p.
[26] 刘丽娟, 王恩见. 双重治理逻辑下政府购买社会工作服务项目的运作困境及对策[J]. 社会建设, 2021, 8(3): 73-84.
[27] 陈天祥, 徐雅倩. 技术自主性与国家形塑国家与技术治理关系研究的政治脉络及其想象[J]. 社会, 2020, 40(5): 137-168.