基于“输入–输出”理论的英语专业口语教学优化研究——以反馈机制与注意机制为中心
Optimizing Oral English Teaching for English Majors from the Perspective of “Input-Output” Theory—Focusing on Feedback and Noticing Mechanisms
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2026.155211, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 姜雨晴:宁波工程学院人文与国际传播学院,浙江 宁波
关键词: “输入–输出”理论反馈机制注意机制英语专业口语教学“Input-Output” Theory Feedback Mechanism Noticing Mechanism English Majors Oral English Teaching
摘要: 在英语专业口语教学中,如何促进语言输入向高质量语言输出的有效转化,是当前教学改革中的重要议题。基于Krashen输入假说和Swain输出假说,结合高校英语专业口语教学中普遍存在的“重知识输入、轻真实输出”“重结果评价、轻过程监控”等问题,本文以反馈机制与注意机制为切入点,探讨二者在英语专业口语教学中的功能定位及其协同价值。文章在梳理“输入–输出”理论、反馈理论和注意假说相关研究的基础上,分析反馈机制在偏误识别、表达调节和学习激励方面的作用,以及注意机制在语言形式觉察、表达监控和输入吸收中的功能,并进一步提出“输入–输出–反馈–注意”联动式口语教学优化路径。研究认为,反馈机制与注意机制分别从外部支持和内部加工两个维度促进学习者口语能力发展,二者的有机结合有助于提升英语专业口语教学的科学性、针对性和实践成效。本文可为高校英语专业口语课堂设计与课程改革提供一定的理论参考与实践启示。
Abstract: In oral English teaching for English majors, how to promote the effective transformation of language input into high-quality language output has become an important issue in current pedagogical reform. Grounded in Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Swain’s Output Hypothesis, and in view of the common problems in university oral English teaching for English majors, such as overemphasis on knowledge input but insufficient authentic output, as well as greater attention to outcome evaluation than to process monitoring, this paper takes the feedback mechanism and the noticing mechanism as its entry point to explore their functional roles and synergistic value in oral English teaching for English majors. Based on a review of studies on Input-Output Theory, feedback theory, and the noticing hypothesis, this paper analyzes the roles of the feedback mechanism in error identification, expression adjustment, and learning motivation, as well as the functions of the noticing mechanism in awareness of linguistic form, monitoring of oral production, and the internalization of input. It further proposes an integrated optimization path for oral English teaching characterized by the linkage of input, output, feedback, and noticing. The study argues that the feedback mechanism and the noticing mechanism facilitate the development of learners’ oral proficiency from the two dimensions of external support and internal processing, and that their organic integration can enhance the scientificity, relevance, and practical effectiveness of oral English teaching for English majors. This study is expected to provide both theoretical reference and practical implications for oral English classroom design and curriculum reform in higher education.
文章引用:姜雨晴. 基于“输入–输出”理论的英语专业口语教学优化研究——以反馈机制与注意机制为中心[J]. 职业教育发展, 2026, 15(5): 80-88. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2026.155211

参考文献

[1] Ellis, R. (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
[2] Krashen, S.D. (1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman.
[3] Skehan, P. (1998) A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press.
[4] 束定芳, 庄智象. 现代外语教学——理论、实践与方法[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 1996.
[5] Lyster, R. and Ranta, L. (1997) Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Schmidt, R.W. (1990) The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Swain, M. (1985) Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In: Gass, S. and Madden, C., Eds., Input in Second Language Acquisition, Newbury House, 235-253.
[8] Swain, M. (2000) The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue. In: Lantolf, J.P., Ed., Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, Oxford University Press, 97-114.
[9] Gass, S.M. and Mackey, A. (2006) Input, Interaction and Output: An Overview. AILA Review, 19, 3-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Long, M.H. (1996) The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In: Ritchie, W.C. and Bhatia, T.K., Eds., Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Elsevier, 413-468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 陈坚林. 现代教育技术与外语教学整合研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2010.
[12] Robinson, P. (1995) Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” Hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 文秋芳. 输出驱动假设与英语专业技能课程改革[J]. 外语界, 2008(2): 2-9.
[14] Son, M. (2025) The Role of Modality and Working Memory Capacity in L2 Production. Language Teaching Research, 29, 2986-3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Ha, X.V., Nguyen, L.T. and Hung, B.P. (2021) Oral Corrective Feedback in English as a Foreign Language Classrooms: A Teaching and Learning Perspective. Heliyon, 7, e07550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Liu, J. and Su, W. (2025) Student Engagement with Oral Feedback on Second Language Learning: A Methodological Review. System, 133, Article ID: 103752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Nakata, Y., Oga-Baldwin, W.L.Q. and Tsuda, A. (2025) Student Perceptions of Feedback and Self-Regulated Language Learning: A Mixed-Methods Investigation. System, 131, Article ID: 103654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Uludağ, O. (2024) Exploring the Relationship between Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Oral Corrective Feedback in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. Heliyon, 10, e29507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Liu, Y. and Ren, W. (2024) Task-Based Language Teaching in a Local EFL Context: Chinese University Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. Language Teaching Research, 28, 2234-2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef