宫颈腺鳞癌的治疗困境与精准治疗展望
Treatment Dilemmas and Prospects of Precision Therapy in Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1651885, PDF,   
作者: 张紫千:华中科技大学同济医学院附属湖北妇幼保健院,妇科,湖北 武汉;蔡鸿宁*:湖北省妇幼保健院妇科恶性肿瘤临床研究中心,湖北 武汉
关键词: 宫颈腺鳞癌治疗困境精准治疗免疫治疗HER2分子标志物Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma Treatment Dilemma Precision Therapy Immunotherapy Her2 Molecular Biomarkers
摘要: 宫颈腺鳞癌(adenosquamous carcinoma, ASC)是一种兼具恶性腺上皮与恶性鳞状上皮成分的混合型宫颈癌,约占全部宫颈癌的3%~10%。现行指南尚无针对ASC的独立治疗标准,临床实践仍沿用基于SCC的诊疗规范,而ASC所特有的放疗抵抗性与系统性播散倾向,使同步放化疗疗效受限,以OUTBACK试验为代表的强化治疗策略亦未能改善生存,揭示了现行治疗范式与ASC生物学特性之间的深层错配。在精准治疗层面,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗已在PD-L1阳性晚期宫颈癌(含ASC)中证实明确生存获益;HER2靶向抗体偶联药物T-DXd在HER2高表达宫颈癌患者中客观缓解率达50.0%。建立基于PD-L1、HER2等分子标志物的个体化分层治疗体系,并开展专门针对ASC的前瞻性临床试验,是突破当前治疗困境的核心路径。
Abstract: Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the cervix is a rare mixed-type cervical cancer characterized by the coexistence of malignant glandular and squamous epithelial components, accounting for approximately 3%~10% of all cervical cancers. Current guidelines lack independent treatment standards for ASC, and clinical practice continues to follow protocols established primarily for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The radioresistance and systemic dissemination tendency intrinsic to ASC limit the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and intensified treatment strategies—exemplified by the OUTBACK trial—have likewise failed to improve survival, revealing a fundamental mismatch between the current treatment paradigm and the biological nature of ASC. In terms of precision therapy, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated a clear survival benefit in PD-L1-positive advanced cervical cancer (including ASC); the HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate T-DXd achieved an objective response rate of 50.0% in patients with HER2-overexpressing cervical cancer. Establishing an individualized stratified treatment system based on molecular biomarkers such as PD-L1 and HER2, and conducting prospective clinical trials specifically designed for ASC, represent the core pathway to overcoming the current therapeutic impasse.
文章引用:张紫千, 蔡鸿宁. 宫颈腺鳞癌的治疗困境与精准治疗展望[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(5): 887-897. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1651885

参考文献

[1] Stolnicu, S., Hoang, L., Zhou, Q., Iasonos, A., Terinte, C., Pesci, A., et al. (2023) Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma: Detailed Analysis of Morphology, Immunohistochemical Profile, and Outcome in 59 Cases. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, 42, 259-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Cui, P., Cong, X., Chen, C., Yang, L. and Liu, Z. (2021) Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Population-Based Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, Article 652850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Yordanov, A., Kostov, S., Slavchev, S., Strashilov, S., Konsoulova, A., Calleja Agius, J., et al. (2021) Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix—Impact of Histology on Clinical Management. Cancer Management and Research, 13, 4979-4986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Yao, G., Qiu, J., Zhu, F. and Wang, X. (2022) Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy or Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy According to Histological Subtype: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, Article 843262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Marth, C., Landoni, F., Mahner, S., McCormack, M., Gonzalez-Martin, A. and Colombo, N. (2017) Cervical Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Annals of Oncology, 28, iv72-iv83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Arora, I., Ganesan, R., Sokhi, T., Shiomi, T., Mikami, Y., Rakislova, N., et al. (2026) Cervical HPV-Independent Adenosquamous Carcinoma: Report of a Case Series. Virchows Archiv. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Glücksmann, A. and Cherry, C.P. (1956) Incidence, Histology, and Response to Radiation of Mixed Carcinomas (Adenoacanthomas) of the Uterine Cervix. Cancer, 9, 971-979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] De Sanjose, S., Quint, W.G., Alemany, L., et al. (2010) Human Papillomavirus Genotype Attribution in Invasive Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Worldwide Study. The Lancet Oncology, 11, 1048-1056.
[9] Clifford, G.M., Smith, J.S., Plummer, M., Muñoz, N. and Franceschi, S. (2003) Human Papillomavirus Types in Invasive Cervical Cancer Worldwide: A Meta-analysis. British Journal of Cancer, 88, 63-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Tjalma, W.A., Fiander, A., Reich, O., Powell, N., Nowakowski, A.M., Kirschner, B., et al. (2013) Differences in Human Papillomavirus Type Distribution in High‐Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Invasive Cervical Cancer in Europe. International Journal of Cancer, 132, 854-867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Yoshida, T., Sano, T., Oyama, T., Kanuma, T. and Fukuda, T. (2009) Prevalence, Viral Load, and Physical Status of HPV 16 and 18 in Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma. Virchows Archiv, 455, 253-259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Huang, Y., Wang, C., Tsai, C., Lai, C., Chang, T., Chou, H., et al. (2012) Clinical Behaviors and Outcomes for Adenocarcinoma or Adenosquamous Carcinoma of Cervix Treated by Radical Hysterectomy and Adjuvant Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 84, 420-427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Gallup, D.G., Harper, R.H. and Stock, R.J. (1985) Poor Prognosis in Patients with Adenosquamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 65, 416-422.
[14] Liu, P., Ji, M., Kong, Y., Huo, Z., Lv, Q., Xie, Q., et al. (2022) Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma/Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Cervix after Radical Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy. BMC Cancer, 22, Article No. 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Rose, P.G., Java, J.J., Whitney, C.W., Stehman, F.B., Lanciano, R. and Thomas, G.M. (2014) Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Carcinomas of the Cervix Compared to Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Cervix in Gynecologic Oncology Group Trials of Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation. Gynecologic Oncology, 135, 208-212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Hu, K., Wang, W., Liu, X., Meng, Q. and Zhang, F. (2018) Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of Cervix after Definitive Radiotherapy or Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. Radiation Oncology, 13, Article No. 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Yokoi, E., Mabuchi, S., Takahashi, R., Matsumoto, Y., Kuroda, H., Kozasa, K., et al. (2017) Impact of Histological Subtype on Survival in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer That Were Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy: Adenocarcinoma/Adenosquamous Carcinoma versus Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 28, e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Huang, R. and Zhou, P. (2020) DNA Damage Response Signaling Pathways and Targets for Radiotherapy Sensitization in Cancer. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 5, Article No. 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Zhang, H., Wang, X., Ma, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, R., Luo, H., et al. (2023) Review of Possible Mechanisms of Radiotherapy Resistance in Cervical Cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 13, Article 1164985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Friedman, C.F., Ravichandran, V., Miller, K., Vanderbilt, C., Zhou, Q., Iasonos, A., et al. (2023) Assessing the Genomic Landscape of Cervical Cancers: Clinical Opportunities and Therapeutic Targets. Clinical Cancer Research, 29, 4660-4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Kitajima, S., Ivanova, E., Guo, S., Yoshida, R., Campisi, M., Sundararaman, S.K., et al. (2019) Suppression of STING Associated with LKB1 Loss in Kras-Driven Lung Cancer. Cancer Discovery, 9, 34-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Lee, J., Lee, C., Hahn, S., Kim, M.A., Kim, H.S., Chung, H.H., et al. (2014) Prognosis of Adenosquamous Carcinoma Compared with Adenocarcinoma in Uterine Cervical Cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 24, 289-294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Chen, J.L., Cheng, J.C., Kuo, S., Chen, C., Lin, M. and Huang, C. (2012) Outcome Analysis of Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma Compared with Adenocarcinoma. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 91, 1158-1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Noh, J.M., Park, W., Kim, Y.S., Kim, J., Kim, H.J., Kim, J., et al. (2014) Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Adenocarcinoma and Adenosquamous Carcinoma in Uterine Cervical Cancer Patients Receiving Surgical Resection Followed by Radiotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 13-10). Gynecologic Oncology, 132, 618-623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Ramirez, P.T., Robledo, K.P., Frumovitz, M., Pareja, R., Ribeiro, R., Lopez, A., et al. (2024) LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 42, 2741-2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Shimada, M., Kigawa, J., Nishimura, R., Yamaguchi, S., Kuzuya, K., Nakanishi, T., et al. (2006) Ovarian Metastasis in Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix. Gynecologic Oncology, 101, 234-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Cheng, H., Huo, L., Zong, L., Kong, Y., Yang, J. and Xiang, Y. (2019) Oncological Outcomes and Safety of Ovarian Preservation for Early Stage Adenocarcinoma of Cervix: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 9, Article 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Ciavattini, A., Giannella, L., Delli Carpini, G., Tsiroglou, D., Sopracordevole, F., Chiossi, G., et al. (2019) Adenocarcinoma in Situ of the Uterine Cervix: Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Italian Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (SICPCV). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 240, 273-277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Sedlis, A., Bundy, B.N., Rotman, M.Z., Lentz, S.S., Muderspach, L.I. and Zaino, R.J. (1999) A Randomized Trial of Pelvic Radiation Therapy versus No Further Therapy in Selected Patients with Stage IB Carcinoma of the Cervix after Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecologic Oncology, 73, 177-183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Rotman, M., Sedlis, A., Piedmonte, M.R., Bundy, B., Lentz, S.S., Muderspach, L.I., et al. (2006) A Phase III Randomized Trial of Postoperative Pelvic Irradiation in Stage IB Cervical Carcinoma with Poor Prognostic Features: Follow-Up of a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 65, 169-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Cibula, D., Akilli, H., Jarkovsky, J., van Lonkhuijzen, L., Scambia, G., Meydanli, M.M., et al. (2023) Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Intermediate-Risk Cervical Cancer Patients—Subanalyses of the SCCAN Study. Gynecologic Oncology, 170, 195-202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Peters, W.A., Liu, P.Y., Barrett, R.J., Stock, R.J., Monk, B.J., Berek, J.S., et al. (2000) Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared with Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy after Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 1606-1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Monk, B.J., Wang, J., Im, S., Stock, R.J., Peters, W.A., Liu, P.Y., et al. (2005) Rethinking the Use of Radiation and Chemotherapy after Radical Hysterectomy: A Clinical-Pathologic Analysis of a Gynecologic Oncology Group/Southwest Oncology Group/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial. Gynecologic Oncology, 96, 721-728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Mileshkin, L.R., Moore, K.N., Barnes, E.H., Gebski, V., Narayan, K., King, M.T., et al. (2023) Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Chemoradiotherapy as Primary Treatment for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer versus Chemoradiotherapy Alone (OUTBACK): An International, Open-Label, Randomised, Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 24, 468-482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Čerina, D., Boraska Jelavić, T., Buljubašić Franić, M., Tomić, K., Bajić, Ž. and Vrdoljak, E. (2022) Is There a Place for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer? Current Oncology, 29, 5223-5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] McCormack, M., Eminowicz, G., Gallardo, D., Diez, P., Farrelly, L., Kent, C., et al. (2024) Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Standard Chemoradiotherapy versus Standard Chemoradiotherapy Alone in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (GCIG INTERLACE): An International, Multicentre, Randomised Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet, 404, 1525-1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Tewari, K.S., Sill, M.W., Penson, R.T., Huang, H., Ramondetta, L.M., Landrum, L.M., et al. (2017) Bevacizumab for Advanced Cervical Cancer: Final Overall Survival and Adverse Event Analysis of a Randomised, Controlled, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). The Lancet, 390, 1654-1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Colombo, N., Dubot, C., Lorusso, D., Caceres, M.V., Hasegawa, K., Shapira-Frommer, R., et al. (2021) Pembrolizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 385, 1856-1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Monk, B.J., Colombo, N., Tewari, K.S., Dubot, C., Caceres, M.V., Hasegawa, K., et al. (2023) First-Line Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy versus Placebo + Chemotherapy for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Final Overall Survival Results of Keynote-826. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41, 5505-5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Tewari, K.S., Colombo, N., Monk, B.J., Dubot, C., Cáceres, M.V., Hasegawa, K., et al. (2024) Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Subgroup Analyses from the KEYNOTE-826 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology, 10, 185-192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[41] Lorusso, D., Xiang, Y., Hasegawa, K., Scambia, G., Leiva, M., Ramos-Elias, P., et al. (2024) Pembrolizumab or Placebo with Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab or Placebo for Newly Diagnosed, High-Risk, Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (EN-GOT-cx11/GOG-3047/KEYNOTE-A18): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Clinical Trial. The Lancet, 403, 1341-1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Itkin, B., Garcia, A., Straminsky, S., Adelchanow, E.D., Pereyra, M., Haab, G.A., et al. (2021) Prevalence of HER2 Overexpression and Amplification in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 16, e0257976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Chavez-Blanco, A., Perez-Sanchez, V., Gonzalez-Fierro, A., Vela-Chavez, T., Candelaria, M., Cetina, L., et al. (2004) HER2 Expression in Cervical Cancer as a Potential Therapeutic Target. BMC Cancer, 4, Article No. 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Meric-Bernstam, F., Makker, V., Oaknin, A., Oh, D., Banerjee, S., González-Martín, A., et al. (2024) Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Patients with HER2-Expressing Solid Tumors: Primary Results from the DESTINY-PanTumor02 Phase II Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 42, 47-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Bukhari, A.B., Chan, G.K. and Gamper, A.M. (2022) Targeting the DNA Damage Response for Cancer Therapy by Inhibiting the Kinase Wee1. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article 828684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]